Distant activity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014: Ground-based results during the Rosetta pre-landing phase

Context. As the ESA Rosetta mission approached, orbited, and sent a lander to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014, a large campaign of ground-based observations also followed the comet. Aims. We constrain the total activity level of the comet by photometry and spectroscopy to place Rosetta results in context and to understand the large-scale structure of the comet’s coma pre-perihelion. Methods. We performed observations using a number of telescopes, but concentrate on results from the 8 m VLT and Gemini South telescopes in Chile. We use R-band imaging to measure the dust coma contribution to the comet’s brightness and UV-visible spectroscopy to search for gas emissions, primarily using VLT/FORS. In addition we imaged the comet in near-infrared wavelengths (JHK) in late 2014 with Gemini-S/Flamingos-2. Results. We find that the comet was already active in early 2014 at heliocentric distances beyond 4 au. The evolution of the total activity (measured by dust) followed previous predictions. No gas emissions were detected despite sensitive searches. Conclusions. The comet maintains a similar level of activity from orbit to orbit, and is in that sense predictable, meaning that Rosetta results correspond to typical behaviour for this comet. The gas production (for CN at least) is highly asymmetric with respect to perihelion, as our upper limits are below the measured production rates for similar distances post-perihelion in previous orbits.

[1]  Athar Yawar,et al.  Icarus , 2017, The Lancet.

[2]  Paul Hartogh,et al.  Spatial and diurnal variation of water outgassing on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko observed from Rosetta/MIRO in August 2014 , 2015 .

[3]  J. Berthelier,et al.  Composition-dependent outgassing of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from ROSINA/DFMS - Implications for nucleus heterogeneity? , 2015 .

[4]  C. Snodgrass,et al.  Optical observations of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with the Nordic Optical Telescope - Comet activity before the solar conjunction , 2015 .

[5]  Martin Rubin,et al.  Inventory of the volatiles on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta/ROSINA , 2015 .

[6]  E. Palomba,et al.  GIADA: shining a light on the monitoring of the comet dust production from the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015 .

[7]  H. Keller,et al.  The changing rotation period of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko controlled by its activity , 2015 .

[8]  S. Debei,et al.  Spectrophotometric properties of the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from the OSIRIS instrument onboard the ROSETTA spacecraft , 2015, 1505.06888.

[9]  T. Encrenaz,et al.  Subsurface properties and early activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[10]  S. Debei,et al.  Dust measurements in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko inbound to the Sun , 2015, Science.

[11]  U. Fink,et al.  The organic-rich surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as seen by VIRTIS/Rosetta , 2015, Science.

[12]  S. Debei,et al.  On the nucleus structure and activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[13]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  Birth of a comet magnetosphere: A spring of water ions , 2015, Science.

[14]  S. Debei,et al.  The morphological diversity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[15]  E. Kührt,et al.  Time variability and heterogeneity in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[16]  L. Maquet The recent dynamical history of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2014, 1412.1983.

[17]  S. Debei,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Activity between March and June 2014 as observed from Rosetta/OSIRIS , 2015 .

[18]  Giampiero Naletto,et al.  The rotation state of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from approach observations with the OSIRIS cameras on Rosetta , 2014 .

[19]  S. Lowry,et al.  Pre-perihelion activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2014 .

[20]  W. Freudling,et al.  Automated data reduction workflows for astronomy , 2013, 1311.5411.

[21]  D. Bramich,et al.  Beginning of activity in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and predictions for 2014–2015 , 2013, 1307.7978.

[22]  R. Street,et al.  Difference image analysis: extension to a spatially varying photometric scale factor and other considerations , 2012, 1210.2926.

[23]  M. Knight,et al.  The highly unusual outgassing of Comet 103P/Hartley 2 from narrowband photometry and imaging of the coma , 2012, 1206.1318.

[24]  R. Manuputy,et al.  X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope , 2011, 1110.1944.

[25]  Donald B. Hampton,et al.  Deep Impact, Stardust-NExT and the behavior of Comet 9P/Tempel 1 from 1997 to 2010 , 2011 .

[26]  J. Ortiz,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at large heliocentric distance , 2011 .

[27]  D. Schleicher THE FLUORESCENCE EFFICIENCIES OF THE CN VIOLET BANDS IN COMETS , 2010 .

[28]  A. Levasseur-Regourd,et al.  Optical properties of dust from Jupiter family comets , 2009 .

[29]  D. M. Bramich,et al.  A new algorithm for difference image analysis , 2008, 0802.1273.

[30]  UK.,et al.  Optical observations of 23 distant Jupiter Family Comets, including 36P/Whipple at multiple phase angles , 2007, 0712.4204.

[31]  D. Schleicher Deep Impact's target Comet 9P/Tempel 1 at multiple apparitions: Seasonal and secular variations in gas and dust production , 2007 .

[32]  D. Schleicher Compositional and physical results for Rosetta's new target Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko from narrowband photometry and imaging , 2006 .

[33]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , 2006 .

[34]  Johan Holmberg,et al.  The colours of the sun , 2005, astro-ph/0511158.

[35]  M. Langlois,et al.  Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers , 2005 .

[36]  Rita Schulz,et al.  Rosetta target comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Postperihelion gas and dust production rates , 2004 .

[37]  S. Debei,et al.  The Dust Environment of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2004, 1602.01965.

[38]  I. Hook,et al.  The Gemini–North Multi‐Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long‐Slit, and Multi‐Object Spectroscopic Modes , 2004 .

[39]  A. Fitzsimmons,et al.  The size distribution of Jupiter Family comet nuclei , 2003, 1101.4228.

[40]  A. Fitzsimmons,et al.  CCD photometry of distant comets. III - Ensemble properties of Jupiter-family comets , 2003 .

[41]  Michael F. A'Hearn,et al.  The HB Narrowband Comet Filters: Standard Stars and Calibrations , 2000 .

[42]  P. Stetson Homogeneous Photometry for Star Clusters and Resolved Galaxies. II. Photometric Standard Stars , 2000, astro-ph/0004144.

[43]  D. Jewitt,et al.  Cometary grain scattering versus wavelength, or 'What color is comet dust'? , 1986 .

[44]  Paul D. Feldman,et al.  Comet Bowell (1980b) , 1982 .

[45]  Robert L. Millis,et al.  The ensemble properties of comets: Results from narrowband photometry of 85 comets , 1995 .