Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of patients with myeloma

The role of imaging in myeloma has gained increasing importance over the past few years. The recently revised definition of myeloma from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) includes cross sectional imaging as a method to define bone disease and also incorporates its use in the disease definition for patients with suspected smouldering myeloma. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence myeloma guidelines also recommend cross sectional imaging for patients with suspected myeloma. There is also increasing use of imaging in disease assessments and the International Myeloma Working Group has recently incorporated imaging in defining new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging‐based evidence of disease. Plain X‐rays have previously been the standard imaging modality included in a myeloma work up at presentation but evidence is mounting for use of cross‐sectional modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18fluoro‐deoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Funding and therefore availability of newer imaging techniques remains a barrier. Here, we propose an evidence‐based approach to the use and technical application of the latest imaging modalities at diagnosis and in the follow‐up of patients with myeloma and plasmacytoma.

[1]  Appearance of monoclonal plasma cell diseases in whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with parameters of disease activity , 2014, International journal of cancer.

[2]  Ji-An Liang,et al.  FDG PET or PET/CT for Detecting Intramedullary and Extramedullary Lesions in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[3]  R. Fanin,et al.  A prospective comparison of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography , magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma , 2007 .

[4]  M. Yun,et al.  Efficacy of Multidetector Row Computed Tomography of the Spine in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Gerhard Glatting,et al.  Multiple Myeloma: Molecular Imaging with 11C-Methionine PET/CT--Initial Experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Bang-Bin Chen,et al.  Correlation among DCE‐MRI measurements of bone marrow angiogenesis, microvessel density, and extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma , 2012, American journal of hematology.

[7]  A. Buck,et al.  18 FDG-PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with multiple myeloma relapse after stem cell transplantation. , 2014 .

[8]  M. Topbaş,et al.  Effect of pathologic fractures on survival in multiple myeloma patients: a case control study , 2008, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[9]  M. Reiser,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for the clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon? , 2002, Cancer.

[10]  C. Collins,et al.  Problems monitoring response in multiple myeloma , 2005, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[11]  W A Murphy,et al.  Bone marrow imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[12]  M. Beksac,et al.  European Myeloma Network Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma-related Complications , 2015, Haematologica.

[13]  A. Kahn,et al.  Myelomatosis: Fundamentals and Clinical Features , 1971 .

[14]  C. Messiou,et al.  Whole body diffusion weighted MRI – a new view of myeloma , 2015, British journal of haematology.

[15]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease , 2013, Leukemia.

[16]  M. Horger,et al.  Simplified response monitoring criteria for multiple myeloma in patients undergoing therapy with novel agents using computed tomography. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[17]  C. Nanni,et al.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  M. Salvatore,et al.  18 F-FDG PET / CT , 99 mTc-MIBI , and MRI in Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 2008 .

[19]  Hans Erik Johnsen,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  K. Nikolaou,et al.  Improved Follow-Up and Response Monitoring of Thoracic Cage Involvement in Multiple Myeloma Using a Novel CT Postprocessing Software: The Lessons We Learned. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  M. Salvatore,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in Evaluation of Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  M. Reiser,et al.  Role of MRI for the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[24]  G. Çeti̇n,et al.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[25]  B. Barlogie,et al.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. , 2009, Blood.

[26]  B. Maldague,et al.  Stage III multiple myeloma: clinical and prognostic value of spinal bone marrow MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[27]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of solitary plasmacytoma of bone. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Sensitivity of whole-body CT and MRI versus projection radiography in the detection of osteolyses in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[29]  A. Wåhlin,et al.  Evaluation of serial bone X-ray examination in multiple myeloma. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[30]  V. Gulani,et al.  Contrast-induced nephropathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: minimizing the risk. , 2012, The Canadian journal of urology.

[31]  C. Nanni,et al.  PET/CT Improves the Definition of Complete Response and Allows to Detect Otherwise Unidentifiable Skeletal Progression in Multiple Myeloma , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  L. Moulopoulos,et al.  Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Quantitative Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Bone Marrow: An Adjunct Tool for the Diagnosis of a Diffuse MR Imaging Pattern in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. , 2017, Radiology.

[34]  D. Collins,et al.  Optimising diffusion weighted MRI for imaging metastatic and myeloma bone disease and assessing reproducibility , 2011, European Radiology.

[35]  S. Knop,et al.  FDG PET/CT depicts cutaneous plasmocytoma. , 2014, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[36]  E. Low,et al.  Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of solitary plasmacytoma of bone and solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma , 2004, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[37]  E. Kotter,et al.  Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey , 2006, European Radiology.

[38]  D. Louis,et al.  Bone marrow imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[39]  Meic H. Schmidt,et al.  Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  A. Buck,et al.  FDG-PET / CT for prognostic stratification of patients with multiple myeloma relapse after stem cell transplantation , 2014 .

[41]  G. Morgan,et al.  Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction. , 2015, Blood.

[42]  R A Kyle,et al.  Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma , 2009, Leukemia.

[43]  A Ferrant,et al.  Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and appearance at MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[44]  M. Attal,et al.  Comparison of MRI and computed tomography in the various stages of plasma cell disorders: correlations with biological and histological findings. Myélome-Midi-Pyrénées Group. , 1996, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[45]  B. Maldague,et al.  Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging in Multiple Myeloma , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[46]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of solitary plasmacytoma. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[47]  R. Fanin,et al.  Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. , 2011, Blood.

[48]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Prognostic value of vertebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with stage I multiple myeloma , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[49]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma. , 1992, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[50]  P. Pereira,et al.  The benefit of using whole‐body, low‐dose, nonenhanced, multidetector computed tomography for follow‐up and therapy response monitoring in patients with multiple myeloma , 2007, Cancer.

[51]  S. Barrington,et al.  Fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of occult disease in multiple myeloma , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[52]  Xiaohu Zhao,et al.  Disseminated plasmacytomas in multiple myeloma: atypical presentations on multimodality images, emphasized on PET/CT , 2013, Annals of Hematology.

[53]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[54]  S. Salmon,et al.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival , 1975, Cancer.

[55]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Risk of disease progression in asymptomatic multiple myeloma. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[56]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Multiple myeloma: MR patterns of response to treatment. , 1994, Radiology.

[57]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in myeloma with presumed solitary plasmocytoma of bone. , 2008, In vivo.

[58]  V. Yu,et al.  Letter: Transfusion of fresh blood in the newborn period. , 1974, Lancet.

[59]  B. Durie The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[60]  Tobias Bäuerle,et al.  Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[61]  Margaret Hall-Craggs,et al.  Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of myeloma , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[62]  R. Hayes,et al.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. , 2009, Blood.

[63]  O. Awan,et al.  Multiple Myeloma Lesion Detection With Whole Body CT Versus Radiographic Skeletal Survey , 2013, Cancer investigation.

[64]  R. Kyle,et al.  Prevalence and monitoring of oligosecretory myeloma. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[65]  R. Walker,et al.  Imaging of Multiple Myeloma and Related Plasma Cell Dyscrasias , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[66]  D. Blondin,et al.  Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma , 2007, European Radiology.

[67]  B. Maldague,et al.  Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey , 1999, British journal of haematology.

[68]  Reinhard Vonthein,et al.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[69]  R. Howard,et al.  A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients. , 2009, Blood.

[70]  A. Chirindel,et al.  Characterizing and Predicting Pathologic Spine Fractures in Myeloma Patients With FDG PET/CT and MR Imaging , 2011, Cancer investigation.

[71]  E Terpos,et al.  International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma , 2009, Leukemia.

[72]  F. Sim,et al.  Effect of granulocyte-stimulating factors on marrow of adult patients with musculoskeletal malignancies: incidence and MRI findings. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[73]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Bone lesions with soft-tissue mass: magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of lymphomatous involvement of the bone marrow versus multiple myeloma and bone metastases. , 1999, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[74]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Diffuse pattern of bone marrow involvement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with high risk cytogenetics and poor outcome in newly diagnosed, symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma: A single center experience on 228 patients , 2012, American journal of hematology.

[75]  Wolfgang Schima,et al.  The skull unfolded: a cranial CT visualization algorithm for fast and easy detection of skull fractures. , 2010, Radiology.

[76]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. , 2013, Blood.

[77]  J. Cox,et al.  Solitary bone plasmacytoma: outcome and prognostic factors following radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[78]  R W Günther,et al.  Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[79]  R. Subramaniam,et al.  Evolving role of FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma imaging and management. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[80]  T Hielscher,et al.  Prognostic significance of whole-body MRI in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance , 2014, Leukemia.

[81]  M. Gore,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN MYELOMA , 1988, The Lancet.

[82]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Comparison of modern and conventional imaging techniques in establishing multiple myeloma‐related bone disease: a systematic review , 2013, British journal of haematology.

[83]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Comparison of whole-body MR imaging and conventional X-ray examination in patients with multiple myeloma and implications for therapy , 2009, Annals of Hematology.

[84]  R. Kyle Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). , 1995, Bailliere's clinical haematology.

[85]  G. Morgan,et al.  Assessing response of myeloma bone disease with diffusion-weighted MRI. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[86]  A. Waxman,et al.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[87]  P. Moreau,et al.  FDG-positron-emission tomography for staging and therapeutic assessment in patients with plasmacytoma , 2008, Haematologica.

[88]  Q. Sodji,et al.  Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression , 2017, Southern medical journal.

[89]  G. Treglia,et al.  The Role of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Evaluating the Response to Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 2012, International journal of molecular imaging.

[90]  H. Brodoefel,et al.  Can whole-body low-dose multidetector CT exclude the presence of myeloma bone disease in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)? , 2012, Academic radiology.

[91]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging for non‐invasive and quantitative monitoring of bone marrow infiltration in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease: a comparative study with histology , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[92]  G. Morgan,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011 , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[93]  R. Fanin,et al.  A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. , 2007, Haematologica.

[94]  P. Moreau,et al.  Multiple myeloma imaging. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[95]  E. Zamagni,et al.  The role of imaging techniques in the management of multiple myeloma , 2012, British journal of haematology.

[96]  Jian Hou,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[97]  Christopher J. Hanrahan,et al.  Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[98]  F. Trippa,et al.  Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression , 2003, Tumori.

[99]  G. Åström,et al.  MR Imaging of Multiple Myeloma in Tumour Mass Measurement at Diagnosis and during Treatment , 1995, Acta radiologica.

[100]  D. Hose,et al.  Changes in magnetic resonance imaging before and after autologous stem cell transplantation correlate with response and survival in multiple myeloma , 2012, Haematologica.

[101]  Hartmut Goldschmidt,et al.  Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3. , 2011, Blood.

[102]  Y. Nakamoto Clinical contribution of PET/CT in myeloma: from the perspective of a radiologist. , 2014, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[103]  Junshik Hong,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging pattern of bone marrow involvement as a new predictive parameter of disease progression in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[104]  S. Ahuja,et al.  Management of metastatic spinal cord compression: awareness of NICE guidance , 2014, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[105]  Kenneth C. Anderson,et al.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[106]  S. Jagannath,et al.  State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[107]  O. Cope,et al.  Multiple myeloma. , 1948, The New England journal of medicine.

[108]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Improvement of diagnostic confidence for detection of multiple myeloma involvement of the ribs by a new CT software generating rib unfolded images: Comparison with 5- and 1-mm axial images , 2015, Skeletal Radiology.

[109]  D. Alexandru,et al.  Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. , 2012, The Permanente journal.

[110]  B. Line,et al.  Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[111]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[112]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and clinical implications. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[113]  M. Reiser,et al.  Role of MRI for the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[114]  S. Sironi,et al.  Diagnostic value of whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) in bone lesions detection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[115]  T. Derlin,et al.  Diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI for the detection of persistent or relapsing disease in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation , 2012, European Radiology.

[116]  Christoph Thomas,et al.  Dual-energy CT: virtual calcium subtraction for assessment of bone marrow involvement of the spine in multiple myeloma. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[117]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[118]  K. Loke,et al.  The Role of PET/CT in the Evaluation of Skeletal Metastases , 2014, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.

[119]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[120]  A. Surov,et al.  Non-osseous incidental findings in low-dose whole-body CT in patients with multiple myeloma. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.