Evidence-based indicator approach to guide preliminary environmental impact assessments of hydropower development.

Global expansion of hydropower resources has increased in recent years to meet growing energy demands and fill worldwide gaps in electricity supply. However, hydropower induces significant environmental impacts on river ecosystems - impacts that are addressed through environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes. The need for effective EIA processes is increasing as environmental regulations are either stressed in developing countries undertaking rapid expansion of hydropower capacity or time- and resource-intensive in developed countries. Part of the challenge in implementing EIAs lies in reaching a consensus among stakeholders regarding the most important environmental factors as the focus of impact studies. To help address this gap, we developed a weight-of-evidence approach (and toolkit) as a preliminary and coarse assessment of the most relevant impacts of hydropower on primary components of the river ecosystem, as identified using river function indicators. Through a science-based questionnaire and predictive model, users identify which environmental indicators may be impacted during hydropower development as well as those indicators that have the highest levels of uncertainty and require further investigation. Furthermore, an assessment tool visualizes inter-dependent indicator relationships, which help formulate hypotheses about causal relationships explored through environmental studies. We apply these tools to four existing hydropower projects and one hypothetical new hydropower project of varying sizes and environmental contexts. We observed consistencies between the output of our tools and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licensing process (inclusive of EIAs) but also important differences arising from holistic scientific evaluations (our toolkit) versus regulatory policies. The tools presented herein are aimed at increasing the efficiency of the EIA processes that engender environmental studies without loss of rigor or transparency of rationale necessary for understanding, considering, and mitigating the environmental consequences of hydropower.

[1]  K. Tockner,et al.  A global boom in hydropower dam construction , 2014, Aquatic Sciences.

[2]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Should We Build More Large Dams? The Actual Costs of Hydropower Megaproject Development , 2014, 1409.0002.

[3]  Taweep Chaisomphob,et al.  Application of geographical information system to site selection of small run-of-river hydropower project by considering engineering/economic/environmental criteria and social impact , 2009 .

[4]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Application of the ELOHA Framework to Regulated Rivers in the Upper Tennessee River Basin: A Case Study , 2013, Environmental Management.

[5]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Alterations of Riparian Ecosystems Caused by River Regulation , 2000 .

[6]  S. Brewer,et al.  Backcasting the decline of a vulnerable Great Plains reproductive ecotype: identifying threats and conservation priorities , 2014, Global change biology.

[7]  J. Lundberg,et al.  Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong , 2016, Science.

[8]  G. Grant The geomorphic response of gravel-bed rivers to dams: perspectives and prospects , 2012 .

[9]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Spatial design principles for sustainable hydropower development in river basins , 2015 .

[10]  K. Jorde,et al.  Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  A. Reichel,et al.  RESERVOIR SILTATION AND SEDIMENT YIELD IN THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK, SOUTH AFRICA: A FIRST ASSESSMENT , 2012 .

[12]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Reviewing and critiquing published approaches to the sustainability assessment of hydropower , 2017 .

[13]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  N. C. van de Giesen,et al.  Systematic high-resolution assessment of global hydropower potential , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  W. Graf Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers , 2006 .

[17]  D. Tullos,et al.  Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China , 2013 .

[18]  N. Poff,et al.  How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal , 2002 .

[19]  Jan Nyssen,et al.  Reservoirs in Tigray (Northern Ethiopia): characteristics and sediment deposition problems , 2006 .

[20]  Piotr Michalak,et al.  Directions in development of hydropower in the world, in Europe and Poland in the period 1995–2011 , 2013 .

[21]  Alexander Erlewein,et al.  Disappearing rivers — The limits of environmental assessment for hydropower in India , 2013 .

[22]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Gravel Addition as a Habitat Restoration Technique for Tailwaters , 2010 .

[23]  Christian Breyer,et al.  How much energy storage is needed to incorporate very large intermittent renewables , 2017 .

[24]  Rainer Froese,et al.  Predicting the distributions of marine organisms at the global scale , 2010 .

[25]  Daniel W. Baker,et al.  Downstream effects of diversion dams on sediment and hydraulic conditions of Rocky Mountain streams , 2011 .

[26]  B. Rhoads,et al.  Influence of four run-of-river dams on channel morphology and sediment characteristics in Illinois, USA , 2014 .

[27]  S. Anders Brandt,et al.  Classification of geomorphological effects downstream of dams , 2000 .

[28]  Paula F. V. Ferreira,et al.  Assessment of the environmental impacts associated with hydropower , 2017 .

[29]  T. Kwak,et al.  Fish Assemblage Changes in an Ozark River after Impoundment: A Long-Term Perspective , 2003 .

[30]  D. Tullos,et al.  Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  W. Fisher,et al.  Downstream fish assemblage response to river impoundment varies with degree of hydrologic alteration , 2014, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Environmental Indicators of Biofuel Sustainability: What About Context? , 2012, Environmental Management.

[33]  G. Kondolf PROFILE: Hungry Water: Effects of Dams and Gravel Mining on River Channels , 1997, Environmental management.

[34]  J. E. Brooks,et al.  Recent habitat association and the historical decline of Notropis simus pecosensis , 2008 .

[35]  Geoffrey E. Petts,et al.  Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management , 1984 .

[36]  M. Pandit,et al.  Threats from India's Himalaya Dams , 2013, Science.

[37]  S. Kao,et al.  A Multi-scale Spatial Approach to Address Environmental Effects of Small Hydropower Development , 2014, Environmental Management.

[38]  Evan Harrison,et al.  Analyzing cause and effect in environmental assessments: using weighted evidence from the literature , 2011, Freshwater Science.

[39]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[40]  P. J. Lamberson,et al.  Ictalurid populations in relation to the presence of a main-stem reservoir in a midwestern warmwater stream with emphasis on the threatened Neosho madtom , 2000 .

[41]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Hy:Con: A Strategic Tool For Balancing Hydropower Development And Conservation Needs , 2016 .

[42]  Matteo Convertino,et al.  Optimal information networks: Application for data-driven integrated health in populations , 2018, Science Advances.

[43]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Review of environmental metrics used across multiple sectors and geographies to evaluate the effects of hydropower development , 2019, Applied Energy.

[44]  N. Poff,et al.  A General Approach to Predicting Ecological Responses to Environmental Flows: Making Best Use of the Literature, Expert Knowledge, and Monitoring Data , 2015 .

[45]  M. Kummu,et al.  Mekong at the Crossroads: Next Steps for Impact Assessment of Large Dams , 2012, AMBIO.

[46]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs , 2016, Environmental Management.

[47]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  A Checklist of River Function Indicators for hydropower ecological assessment. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  Anabela Botelho,et al.  How Relevant Are Non-Use Values and Perceptions in Economic Valuations? The Case of Hydropower Plants , 2019, Energies.

[49]  D. Pauly,et al.  Mapping world-wide distributions of marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model , 2006 .

[50]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[51]  Peter Bosshard,et al.  Exporting dams: China's hydropower industry goes global. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[52]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  A dataset of eco-evidence tools to inform early-stage environmental impact assessments of hydropower development , 2020, Data in brief.

[53]  Anthony D. Cak,et al.  Scientifically assess impacts of sustainable investments , 2018, Science.

[54]  S. Levin,et al.  Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.