The impact of multichannel message inconsistency on verbal and nonverbal decoding behaviors

This study examines the relative importance and specific nature of the nonverbal and verbal decoding behaviors that subjects use to respond to inconsistent messages. The results indicate not only that inconsistent messages have a greater impact on nonverbal than verbal decoding behaviors but that individuals responding to such messages behave in ways predicted by the double‐bind theory of communication. Decoding behaviors appear to pass through a three‐step sequence which moves from confusion and uncertainty to a high degree of deliberation and interest to expressions of displeasure, hostility, and withdrawal. These decoding behaviors are illustrated and their theoretical implications discussed.

[1]  R. Feldman.  Nonverbal Disclosure of Teacher Deception and Interpersonal Affect. , 1976 .

[2]  J. R. Graves,et al.  Proxemic Behavior as a Function of Inconsistent Verbal and Nonverbal Messages. , 1976 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Congruent and Contradictory Verbal and Nonverbal Communications of Cooperativeness and Competitiveness in Negotiations , 1976 .

[4]  D. E. Bugental.  Interpretations of naturally occurring discrepancies between words and intonation: Modes of inconsistency resolution. , 1974 .

[5]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The Development of an Instrument for Measuring Intermediate Interaction Behavior in Small Group Communication. , 1971 .

[6]  J. Kaswan,et al.  Verbal-nonverbal conflict in parental messages to normal and disturbed children. , 1971, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  J. Kaswan,et al.  Perception of contradictory meanings conveyed by verbal and nonverbal channels. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  N. Nie,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[9]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Communication of Inferior and Superior Attitudes by Verbal and Non‐verbal Signals* , 1970 .

[10]  Dale G. Leathers.  Process disruption and measurement in small group communication , 1969 .

[11]  M. J. Rosenberg,et al.  The Paralanguage of Experimenter Bias , 1969 .

[12]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. , 1967, Journal of consulting psychology.

[13]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Decoding of inconsistent communications. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Thomas M. Scheidel,et al.  Feedback in small group communication , 1966 .

[15]  A. J. Barr,et al.  A user's guide to SAS 76 , 1976 .

[16]  Dale G. Leathers.  Nonverbal communication systems , 1976 .

[17]  N. Nie.  SPSS: statistical package for the social sciences , 1975 .

[18]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .