Corporate Governance and Shareholder Initiatives: Empirical Evidence

Shareholder-initiated proxy proposals on corporate governance issues became popular in the late 1980s as corporate takeover activity declined. We find firms attracting governance proposals have poor prior performance, as measured by the market-to-book ratio, operating return, and sales growth. There is little evidence that operating returns improve after proposals. The proposals also have negligible effects on company share values and top management turnover. Even proposals that receive a majority of shareholder votes typically do not engender share price increases or discernible changes in firm policies.

[1]  Annette B. Poulsen,et al.  Proxy Contests, Shareholder Wealth and Operating Performance: An Analysis of the 1980s , 1994 .

[2]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[3]  J. Pound Raiders, Targets, And Politics: The History And Future Of American Corporate Control , 1992 .

[4]  Sunil Wahal Public Pension Fund Activism and Firm Performance , 1994 .

[5]  Katherine Schipper,et al.  Mergers, Restructuring and Corporate Control , 1990 .

[6]  Stephen L. Nesbitt LONG‐TERM REWARDS FROM SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM: A STUDY OF THE “CalPERS EFFECT” , 1994 .

[7]  H. Demsetz,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  G. Schwert,et al.  Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures , 1993 .

[9]  Stuart C. Gilson Management turnover and financial distress , 1989 .

[10]  Coffee,et al.  Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor , 1991 .

[11]  H. DeAngelo,et al.  Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth , 1983 .

[12]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[13]  M. Zenner,et al.  A requiem for the USA Is small shareholder monitoring effective , 1996 .

[14]  April Klein,et al.  Shareholder Proposals and Corporate Governance , 1995 .

[15]  Annette B. Poulsen,et al.  Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980 , 1987 .

[16]  Ralph A. Walkling,et al.  The Impact of Managerial Ownership on Acquisition Attempts and Target Shareholder Wealth , 1993, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[17]  R. Romano Public Pension Fund Activism in Corporate Governance Reconsidered , 1993 .

[18]  Michael D. Ryngaert The effect of poison pill securities on shareholder wealth , 1988 .

[19]  Bernard Black INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE CASE FOR INSTITUTIONAL VOICE , 1992 .

[20]  Jonathan M. Karpoff,et al.  The wealth effects of second-generation state takeover legislation , 1989 .

[21]  Dennis E. Logue,et al.  Foundations of Finance. , 1977 .

[22]  Robert C. Pozen Institutional investors: The reluctant activists , 1994 .

[23]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics , 1996 .

[24]  E. Dimson Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading , 1979 .

[25]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers , 1989 .

[26]  M. Salinger,et al.  Standard Errors in Event Studies , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[27]  S. R. Kole Measuring managerial equity ownership: a comparison of sources of ownership data , 1995 .

[28]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis , 1986 .

[29]  Bernard S. Black,et al.  Shareholder Passivity Reexamined , 1990 .

[30]  Martin Lipton,et al.  A New System of Corporate Governance: The Quinquennial Election of Directors , 1991 .

[31]  S. Linn,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of ‘antitakeover’ amendments on common stock prices , 1983 .

[32]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Managers' voting rights and corporate control , 1989 .

[33]  Joel Hasbrouck The characteristics of takeover targets and other measures , 1985 .

[34]  J. Pound,et al.  Information, Ownership Structure, and Shareholder Voting: Evidence from Shareholder-Sponsored Corporate Governance Proposals , 1993 .

[35]  Charles Wohlstetter Pension fund socialism: Can bureaucrats run the blue chips? , 1993 .

[36]  Ralph A. Walkling,et al.  Poison pill securities: Stockholder wealth, profitability, and ownership structure , 1988 .

[37]  William L. Megginson,et al.  The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[38]  Sunil Wahal,et al.  Pension Fund Activism and Firm Performance , 1996, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[39]  Michael P. Smith Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors: Evidence from CalPERS , 1996 .

[40]  W. Mikkelson,et al.  Withdrawn Security Offerings , 1988, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.