Counting what counts: performance measurement and evidence‐based practice

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore conceptual and practical links between performance measurement and evidence‐based library and information practice (EBLIP) and to identify lessons to be learned from evidence‐based healthcare.Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a selective review of key writings in EBLIP for reference to performance measurement.Findings – The paper finds that performance measurement may variously be viewed as one small, but essential, stage of EBLIP or an overarching approach to utilisation of data of which research‐derived evidence is a single sourceResearch limitations/implications – Similarities and potential linkages between the two activities are currently underdeveloped and need to be explored through rigorous empirical research.Practical implications – The stages of EBLIP are modelled in relation to a single case study of reference checking.Originality/value – This is the first article to develop explicit links between these two areas of information pra...

[1]  James Self,et al.  From Measurement to Management: Using Data Wisely for Planning and Decision-Making , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[2]  P K Rangachari,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine: Old French Wine with a New Canadian Label? , 1997, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  E. Schneider.  Measuring mortality outcomes to improve health care: rational use of ratings and rankings. , 2002, Medical care.

[4]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development , 1996, BMJ.

[5]  David Wainwright,et al.  Towards a framework for benchmarking ICT practice, competence and performance in small firms , 2005 .

[6]  J. Eldredge.  Evidence-Based Librarianship , 2000, Medical reference services quarterly.

[7]  C. Pope,et al.  Opening the black box: an encounter in the corridors of health services research. , 1993, BMJ.

[8]  D. Nathwani.  From evidence-based guideline methodology to quality of care standards. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[9]  Andrew Booth.  Formulating answerable questions , 2004 .

[10]  Abby Haynes,et al.  Bridging the gulf: mixed methods and library service evaluation , 2004 .

[11]  D. Pencheon,et al.  Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel? , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  A. Booth.  Evaluating your performance , 2004 .

[13]  A. Booth.  A checker's career? , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[14]  T Scott Plutchak,et al.  Building a body of evidence. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[15]  J. Eldredge.  Evidence-based librarianship: an overview. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[16]  Steve Hiller,et al.  How Different Are They? A Comparison By Academic Area Of Library Use, Priorities, and Information Needs at the University of Washington. , 2002, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[17]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: A Handbook , 2003 .

[18]  E. Lewis.  Ancient clinical trials. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Charles Vincent,et al.  Risk, safety, and the dark side of quality. , 1997 .