Variations in Rear Seat Cushion Properties and the Effects on Submarining

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of seating posture and seat cushion properties on submarining risk for rear seated children. Methods: An instrumented 6-year-old Hybrid III dummy restrained by an inertial-reel 3-point seat belt was subjected to simulated frontal impacts (Δv = 28.8 km/h, peak acceleration = 16 g). Dummy motion was captured using high-speed digital video. Head acceleration, neck loads, chest deflection, pelvic rotation, and femur displacement were used to assess submarining. Factors investigated included pre-impact seating posture, seat cushion length, stiffness of the seat cushion foam, and the inclination of the seat cushion. Results: The most severe submarining was observed when the dummy was seated in a slouched posture where pelvic rotation was over 3 times greater than in the upright seating posture. Though the standard seat cushion with the dummy seated in the upright posture recorded the lowest values of pelvic rotation and femur displacement, it is unlikely that a child will sit in such a posture. The shortened seat cushion increased femur displacement by 19 percent compared to the standard test seat, but it offers good pre-impact belt position. Submarining occurred in cases where the front edge of the seat collapsed during interactions with the dummy's buttocks. Conclusions: These data suggest that shortening the rear seat cushion alone will not necessarily prevent submarining, but this does allow improved seated posture of the occupant, thus reducing submarining risk. This study has also shown that the collapse of the front edge of the seat cushion is a critical factor in submarining risk.

[1]  D Adomeit,et al.  Seat Design-A Significant Factor for Safety Belt Effectiveness , 1979 .

[2]  E. K. Moll,et al.  Seat belt syndrome in children: A case report and review of the literature , 2001, Pediatric emergency care.

[3]  Heiko Johannsen,et al.  Development and assessment of a surface force abdominal sensor , 2007 .

[4]  B. Lundell,et al.  SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF A REAR SEAT BELT SYSTEM WITH OPTIMIZED SEAT CUSHION DESIGN , 1981 .

[5]  M. Stommel,et al.  Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: empirical findings and health implications. , 1999, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[6]  Gina Bertocci,et al.  The effects of wheelchair-seating stiffness and energy absorption on occupant frontal impact kinematics and submarining risk using computer simulation. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  A New Database of Child Anthropometry and Seated Posture for Automotive Safety Applications , 2005 .

[8]  A F Roche,et al.  CDC growth charts: United States. , 2000, Advance data.

[9]  B. Beaver,et al.  Abdominal injuries in restrained pediatric passengers. , 1993, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[10]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  Improved positioning procedures for 6YO and 10YO ATDs based on child occupant postures. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  Basuki Suratno,et al.  The Need for Enhanced Protocols for Assessing the Dynamic Performance of Booster Seats in Frontal Impacts , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Stephen W. Rouhana,et al.  Assessing Submarining and Abdominal Injury Risk in the Hybrid III Family of Dummies: Part II - Development of the Small Female Frangible Abdomen , 1990 .

[13]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  Anthropometric specification of child crash dummy pelves through statistical analysis of skeletal geometry. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  G. J. Ebrahim,et al.  World Report on Child Injury PreventionM. Peden, K. Oyebite, J. Ozanne-Smith, A.A. Hyder, C. Branche, F. AKM Rahman, F. Rivara, K. Bartolomeos (eds) , 2010 .

[15]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  Evaluation of the static belt fit provided by belt-positioning booster seats. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  Geometry of rear seats and child restraints compared to child anthropometry. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[17]  Martha Warren Bidez,et al.  Small Occupant Dynamics in the Rear Seat: Influence of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint Design , 2005 .

[18]  D Adomeit,et al.  MOTION SEQUENCE CRITERIA AND DESIGN PROPOSALS FOR RESTRAINT DEVICES IN ORDER TO AVOID UNFAVORABLE BIOMECHANIC CONDITIONS AND SUBMARINING. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1975 .

[19]  E. K. Moll,et al.  The danger of premature graduation to seat belts for young children. , 2000, Pediatrics.

[20]  J C Lane The seat belt syndrome in children. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  A. Fayon,et al.  A Comparison Between Part 572 Dummy and Human Subject in the Problem of Submarining , 1979 .

[22]  Martin R. Eichelberger,et al.  Injuries to children restrained in 2- and 3- point belts , 1998 .

[23]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of Child Body Dimensions with Rear Seat Geometry , 2006 .

[24]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Suboptimal restraint affects the pattern of abdominal injuries in children involved in motor vehicle crashes. , 2003, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[25]  Kathleen D. Klinich,et al.  SURVEY OF OLDER CHILDREN IN AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINTS , 1994 .

[26]  L Sminkey,et al.  World report on child injury prevention , 2008, Injury Prevention.

[27]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  Assessing child belt fit, volume II: effect of restraint configuration, booster seat designs, seating procedure, and belt fit on the dynamic response of the hybrid III 10-year-old ATD in sled tests , 2008 .

[28]  Jacques Faure,et al.  PROCEDURE TO ASSESS SUBMARINING IN FRONTAL IMPACT , 2007 .

[29]  W N Hardy,et al.  Development of a Reusable, Rate-Sensitive Abdomen for the Hybrid III Family of Dummies. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[30]  B. Lindblad,et al.  Abdominal injuries in children: an analysis of 348 cases. , 1985, Injury.

[31]  John D. Horsch,et al.  A kinematic analysis of lap-belt submarining for test dummies , 1989 .

[32]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Protection of children on board vehicles: influence of pelvis design and thigh and abdomen stiffness on the submarining risk for dummies installed on a booster , 1996 .

[33]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Reconstruction of a Real World Crash Involving a Child Using Hybrid III 10-Year Old and 5th Percentile Adult Female ATDs , 2009 .

[34]  J KULOWSKI,et al.  Intra-abdominal injury from safety belt in auto accident; report of a case. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of surgery.

[35]  Kristy B Arbogast,et al.  Optimal Restraint Reduces the Risk of Abdominal Injury in Children Involved in Motor Vehicle Crashes , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[36]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Evaluating Pediatric Abdominal Injuries , 2005 .