Mining interesting link formation rules in social networks

Link structures are important patterns one looks out for when modeling and analyzing social networks. In this paper, we propose the task of mining interesting Link Formation rules (LF-rules) containing link structures known as Link Formation patterns (LF-patterns). LF-patterns capture various dyadic and/or triadic structures among groups of nodes, while LF-rules capture the formation of a new link from a focal node to another node as a postcondition of existing connections between the two nodes. We devise a novel LF-rule mining algorithm, known as LFR-Miner, based on frequent subgraph mining for our task. In addition to using a support-confidence framework for measuring the frequency and significance of LF-rules, we introduce the notion of expected support to account for the extent to which LF-rules exist in a social network by chance. Specifically, only LF-rules with higher-than-expected support are considered interesting. We conduct empirical studies on two real-world social networks, namely Epinions and myGamma. We report interesting LF-rules mined from the two networks, and compare our findings with earlier findings in social network analysis.

[1]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[2]  Takashi Washio,et al.  An Apriori-Based Algorithm for Mining Frequent Substructures from Graph Data , 2000, PKDD.

[3]  Jiawei Han,et al.  CloseGraph: mining closed frequent graph patterns , 2003, KDD '03.

[4]  James A. Davis Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs , 1977 .

[5]  Jiawei Han,et al.  gSpan: graph-based substructure pattern mining , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings..

[6]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Do You Trust to Get Trust? A Study of Trust Reciprocity Behaviors and Reciprocal Trust Prediction , 2010, SDM.

[7]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Mining Graph Evolution Rules , 2009, ECML/PKDD.

[8]  Katherine Faust,et al.  Very Local Structure in Social Networks , 2006 .

[9]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Networks Network Motifs : Simple Building Blocks of Complex , 2002 .

[10]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Propagation of trust and distrust , 2004, WWW '04.

[11]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Patterns of Cascading Behavior in Large Blog Graphs , 2007, SDM.

[12]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Random Directed Graph Distributions in the Triad Census in Social Networks , 1975 .

[13]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Directed Closure Process in Hybrid Social-Information Networks, with an Analysis of Link Formation on Twitter , 2010, ICWSM.

[14]  Paolo Avesani,et al.  Controversial Users Demand Local Trust Metrics: An Experimental Study on Epinions.com Community , 2005, AAAI.

[15]  Christophe Prieur,et al.  Structure of Neighborhoods in a Large Social Network , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[16]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Signed networks in social media , 2010, CHI.

[17]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[18]  George Karypis,et al.  Frequent subgraph discovery , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[19]  Katherine Faust,et al.  7. Very Local Structure in Social Networks , 2007 .

[20]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network , 2006, PAKDD.