Maintaining a Robust Pipeline of Future Physician-Scientists.

Perhaps the most dramatic finding in the 2014 National Institutes of Health Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group Report is the aging of the physician-scientist workforce. There are currently 1.6-fold more physician-scientists over the age of 61 than under the age of 50, indicating that our pipeline of physician-scientists is insufficient to maintain current numbers. Several factors likely contribute to this leaky pipeline, including the long training periods, poor compensation during training, diminished funding odds for young investigators, and lack of role models, particularly for women and underrepresented minorities. This perspective will present several ideas for how training programs can play a role in assuring a robust pipeline of future physician scientists.

[1]  Ruth Gotian,et al.  Gateways to the Laboratory: How an MD–PhD Program Increased the Number of Minority Physician–Scientists , 2017, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  H. Furuya,et al.  On the brink of extinction: the future of translational physician-scientists in the United States , 2017, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[3]  X. Wang,et al.  Characteristics and outcomes of Canadian MD/PhD program graduates: a cross-sectional survey. , 2017, CMAJ open.

[4]  D. Milewicz,et al.  Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now. , 2015, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  How diversity works. , 2014, Scientific American.

[6]  A. Feldman The National Institutes of Health Physician‐Scientist Workforce Working Group Report: A Roadmap for Preserving the Physician‐Scientist , 2014, Clinical and translational science.

[7]  M. Akabas,et al.  A closer look at attrition in MD-PhD programs. , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  H. Garrison,et al.  NIH research funding and early career physician scientists: continuing challenges in the 21st century , 2014, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[9]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Educational Outcomes for Students Enrolled in MD–PhD Programs at Medical School Matriculation, 1995–2000: A National Cohort Study , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  M. Akabas,et al.  Are MD-PhD Programs Meeting Their Goals? An Analysis of Career Choices Made by Graduates of 24 MD-PhD Programs , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  P. Meier-Abt,et al.  Swiss national MD-PhD-program: an outcome analysis. , 2009, Swiss medical weekly.

[12]  J. Wyngaarden The clinical investigator as an endangered species. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.