DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF BANKFULL HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS FOR THE PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES 1

Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships are used to estimate channel dimensions for streamflow simulation models, which require channel geometry data as input parameters. Often, one nationwide curve is used across the entire United States (U.S.) (e.g., in Soil and Water Assessment Tool), even though studies have shown that the use of regional curves can improve the reliability of predictions considerably. In this study, regional regression equations predicting bankfull width, depth, and cross-sectional area as a function of drainage area are developed for the Physiographic Divisions and Provinces of the U.S. and compared to a nationwide equation. Results show that the regional curves at division level are more reliable than the nationwide curve. Reliability of the curves depends largely on the number of observations per region and how well the sample represents the population. Regional regression equations at province level yield even better results than the division-level models, but because of small sample sizes, the development of meaningful regression models is not possible in some provinces. Results also show that drainage area is a less reliable predictor of bankfull channel dimensions than bankfull discharge. It is likely that the regional curves can be improved using multiple regression models to incorporate additional explanatory variables. (KEY TERMS: streams; fluvial geomorphology; bankfull discharge; nationwide and regional regression equations; hydrologic modeling.) Bieger, Katrin, Hendrik Rathjens, Peter M. Allen, and Jeffrey G. Arnold, 2015. Development and Evaluation of Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for the Physiographic Regions of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 1-17. DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12282

[1]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Continental‐scale relationship between bankfull width and drainage area for single‐thread alluvial channels , 2014 .

[2]  B. Baldigo,et al.  Optimizing Bankfull Discharge and Hydraulic Geometry Relations for Streams in New York State 1 , 2012 .

[3]  Jessica Haucke,et al.  Stationarity of Streamflow Records and Their Influence on Bankfull Regional Curves 1 , 2011 .

[4]  G. Wilkerson,et al.  Improved Bankfull Channel Geometry Prediction Using Two‐Year Return‐Period Discharge 1 , 2011 .

[5]  Ryan A. McManamay,et al.  REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS APPLIED TO HYDROLOGY: CAN LANDSCAPE-BASED FRAMEWORKS CAPTURE THE HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY? , 2011 .

[6]  J. McPherson.  Bankfull Geomorphic Relationships and Reference Reach Assessment of the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province of East Tennessee , 2011 .

[7]  R. Marston,et al.  Ecoregions and stream morphology in eastern Oklahoma , 2010 .

[8]  G. Padmanabhan,et al.  Regional Dimensionless Rating Curves to Estimate Design Flows and Stages , 2010 .

[9]  G. Padmanabhan,et al.  Regression estimates of design flows for ungaged sites using bankfull geometry and flashiness. , 2010 .

[10]  Alan T. Herlihy,et al.  Downstream variation in bankfull width of wadeable streams across the conterminous United States , 2009 .

[11]  Benjamin T. Crosby,et al.  Estimation of stream channel geometry in Idaho using GIS-derived watershed characteristics , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  R. Lotspeich.  Regional Curves of Bankfull Channel Geometry for Non-Urban Streams in the Piedmont Physiographic Province, Virginia , 2009 .

[13]  T. Messinger.  Regional Curves for Bankfull Channel Characteristics in the Appalachian Plateaus, West Virginia , 2009 .

[14]  Barry P. Baldigo,et al.  Bankfull discharge and channel characteristics of streams in New York State. , 2009 .

[15]  S. Howell.  Development of Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curves for the Santa Cruz Mountains , 2009 .

[16]  P. Johnson,et al.  Regional channel geometry equations: a statistical comparison for physiographic provinces in the eastern US , 2008 .

[17]  R. Derose,et al.  Variability and uncertainty in reach bankfull hydraulic geometry , 2008 .

[18]  G. Wilkerson.  Improved Bankfull Discharge Prediction Using 2‐Year Recurrence‐Period Discharge 1 , 2008 .

[19]  Jessica L. Mistak,et al.  Regional Hydraulic Geometry Curve for the Upper Menominee River , 2008 .

[20]  S. Dingman.  Analytical derivation of at-a-station hydraulic–geometry relations , 2007 .

[21]  D. Moyer,et al.  Development of Relations of Stream Stage to Channel Geometry and Discharge for Stream Segments Simulated with Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF), Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Adjacent Parts of Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware , 2007 .

[22]  B. Baldigo,et al.  Regionalized equations for bankfull discharge and channel characteristics of streams in New York State—Hydrologic Regions 1 and 2 in the Adirondack Region of northern New York , 2007 .

[23]  B. Baldigo,et al.  Regionalized Equations for Bankfull-Discharge and Channel Characteristics of Streams in New York State - Hydrologic Region 3 East of the Hudson River , 2007 .

[24]  T. Anderson.  View from the river. , 2007, The practising midwife.

[25]  Jeffrey J. Chaplin,et al.  Bankfull Regional Curves for Streams in the Non-Urban, Non-Tidal Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, Virginia and Maryland , 2007 .

[26]  P. Julien,et al.  Downstream Hydraulic Geometry of Alluvial Channels , 2006 .

[27]  Peggy A Johnson,et al.  Assessing Stream Channel Stability at Bridges in Physiographic Regions , 2006 .

[28]  R. Parmar,et al.  ESTIMATING STREAMFLOW AND ASSOCIATED HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY, THE MID‐ATLANTIC REGION, USA 1 , 2006 .

[29]  D. J. Hagerty,et al.  Geomorphic Characteristics of Streams in the Mississippi Embayment Physiographic Region of Kentucky , 2006 .

[30]  Grant Workplan.  Bankfull Characteristics of Select Streams in the Four Rivers and Upper Cumberland River Basin Management Units , 2005 .

[31]  Edward J. Doheny,et al.  Development and analysis of regional curves for streams in the non-urban valley and ridge physiographic province, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia , 2005 .

[32]  A. Ernst,et al.  Regionalized equations for bankfull-discharge and channel characteristics of streams in New York state: hydrologic region 5 in central New York , 2005 .

[33]  C Metcalf,et al.  REGIONAL CHANNEL CHARACTERISTICS FOR MAINTAINING NATURAL FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY IN FLORIDA STREAMS , 2004 .

[34]  Brian P. Bledsoe,et al.  WIDTH OF STREAMS AND RIVERS IN RESPONSE TO VEGETATION, BANK MATERIAL, AND OTHER FACTORS 1 , 2004 .

[35]  A. Simon,et al.  Suspended-sediment transport rates at the 1.5-year recurrence interval for ecoregions of the United States: transport conditions at the bankfull and effective discharge? , 2004 .

[36]  T. Messinger,et al.  Regional Relations in Bankfull Channel Characteristics determined from flow measurements at selected stream-gaging stations in West Virginia, 1911-2002 , 2004 .

[37]  S. Lawlor.  Determination of channel-morphology characteristics, bankfull discharge, and various design-peak discharges in western Montana , 2004 .

[38]  J. Omernik,et al.  JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION , 2004 .

[39]  J. G. King,et al.  Sediment Transport Data and Related Information for Selected Coarse-Bed Streams and Rivers in Idaho , 2004 .

[40]  W. Sweet,et al.  BANKFULL HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS AND RECURRENCE INTERVALS FOR NORTH CAROLINA'S COASTAL PLAIN 1 , 2003 .

[41]  W. Hession,et al.  Influence of bank vegetation on channel morphology in rural and urban watersheds , 2003 .

[42]  U. Fish.  Maryland Stream Survey : Bankfull Discharge and Channel Characteristics of Streams in the Piedmont Hydrologic Region , 2003 .

[43]  Sarah J. Miller,et al.  OPTIMIZING CATSKILL MOUNTAIN REGIONAL BANKFULL DISCHARGE AND HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS , 2003 .

[44]  T. Moody,et al.  Regional Relationships for Bankfull Stage in Natural Channels of the Arid Southwest , 2003 .

[45]  P. Jackson,et al.  BANKFULL DISCHARGE RECURRENCE INTERVALS AND REGIONAL HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY RELATIONSHIPS: PATTERNS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, USA 1 , 2001 .

[46]  K. White.  Regional curve development and selection of a reference reach in the non-urban, lowland sections of the Piedmont physiographic province, Pennsylvania and Maryland , 2001 .

[47]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  ALLUVIAL CHANNEL GEOMETRY : THEORY AND ApPLICATIONS , 2001 .

[48]  R. Daniel,et al.  Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships for North Carolina streams , 1999 .

[49]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[50]  P. Johnson,et al.  Uncertainty in Estimating Bankfull Conditions , 1996 .

[51]  F. Kolberg,et al.  Active Channel Geometry and Discharge Relations of U.S. Piedmont and Midwestern Streams: The Variable Exponent Model Revisited , 1995 .

[52]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL GEOMETRY FOR USE IN PLANNING‐LEVEL MODELS , 1994 .

[53]  R. Hirsch,et al.  ESTIMATING DESIGN-FLOOD DISCHARGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA USING DRAINAGE-BASIN AND CHANNEL-GEOMETRY CHARACTERISTICS , 1993 .

[54]  C. Thorne,et al.  Stable Channels with Mobile Gravel Beds , 1986 .

[55]  K. D. Cartier,et al.  HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY AND STREAMFLOW OF CHANNELS IN THE PICEANCE BASIN, RIO BLANCO AND GARFIELD COUNTIES, COLORADO , 1986 .

[56]  E. Andrews.  Bed-material entrainment and hydraulic geometry of gravel-bed rivers in Colorado , 1984 .

[57]  W. R. Osterkamp,et al.  Sediment and channel-geometry investigations for the Kansas River bank stabilization study, Kansas, Nebraska, and Colorado , 1982 .

[58]  Chris C. Park.  World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations , 1977 .

[59]  M. Gordon Wolman,et al.  Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology , 1965 .

[60]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  River channel patterns: Braided, meandering, and straight , 1957 .

[61]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .