Efficient reliability estimate of passive thermal hydraulic safety system with automatic differentiation

Abstract An approach for efficient estimation of passive safety system functional reliability has been developed and applied to a simplified model of the passive residual heat transport system typical of sodium cooled fast reactors to demonstrate the reduction in computational time. The method is based on generating linear approximations to the best estimate computer code, using the technique of automatic reverse differentiation. This technique enables determination of linear approximation to the code in a few runs independent of the number of input variables for each response variable. The likely error due to linear approximation is reduced by augmented sampling through best estimate code in the neighborhood of the linear failure surface but in a sub domain where linear approximation error is relatively more. The efficiency of this new approach is compared with importance sampling MCS which uses the linear approximation near the failure region and with Direct Monte-Carlo Simulation. In the importance sampling MCS, variants employing random sampling with Box–Muller algorithm and Markov Chain algorithm are inter-compared. The significance of the results with respect to system reliability is also discussed.

[1]  A. John Arul,et al.  Functional reliability analysis of Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System of Indian 500 MWe PFBR , 2008 .

[2]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Augmenting approximate solutions for consistent reliability analysis , 2007 .

[3]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2005 .

[4]  E. M. Oblow Sensitivity theory for reactor thermal-hydraulics problems , 1978 .

[5]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Estimation of the Functional Failure Probability of a Thermal Hydraulic Passive System by Subset Simulation , 2009 .

[6]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  Evaluating derivatives - principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation, Second Edition , 2000, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[7]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[8]  Thomas Kaminski,et al.  Recipes for adjoint code construction , 1998, TOMS.

[9]  Jose Reyes,et al.  Natural Circulation in Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Phenomena, models, and methodology for system reliability assessments , 2005 .

[10]  A. John Arul,et al.  Adjoint operator approach to functional reliability analysis of passive fluid dynamical systems , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Engineering Design Reliability Handbook , 2004 .

[12]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[14]  C. V. Parks,et al.  Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of Extremum-Type Responses in Reactor Safety , 1983 .

[15]  Niels C. Lind,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 2006 .

[16]  L. Burgazzi,et al.  RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PASSIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS , 1998 .