Dermoscopy of solitary angiokeratomas: a morphological study.

OBJECTIVES To describe the dermoscopic structures and patterns associated with solitary angiokeratomas and to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and reproducibility of these dermoscopic features. DESIGN Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING University hospitals in Spain, Italy, Argentina, New York City, and Austria. PATIENTS There were 256 patients total, and 32 specimens each of solitary angiokeratomas, melanocytic nevi, Spitz-Reed nevi, malignant melanomas, pigmented basal cell carcinomas, dermatofibromas, seborrheic keratoses, and other vascular lesions (19 angiomas, 7 pyogenic granulomas, 3 spider nevi, 2 lymphangiomas, and 1 venous lake) were consecutively collected from the laboratories of 8 hospitals. Diagnoses of all patients' lesions were confirmed histopathologically. INTERVENTION Dermoscopic examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The frequency, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, intraobserver agreement, and interobserver agreement of the different dermoscopic features associated with solitary angiokeratomas were calculated, and the differences were evaluated using the chi(2) or Fisher exact test. RESULTS Six dermoscopic structures were evident in at least 50% of the solitary angiokeratomas: dark lacunae (94%), whitish veil (91%), erythema (69%), peripheral erythema (53%), red lacunae (53%), and hemorrhagic crusts (53%). Dark lacunae exhibited a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 99.1% (P<.001 for both), not being found in malignant melanomas or pigmented basal cell carcinomas. The positive predictive value was 93.8%, and the negative predictive value was 99.1%. The intraobserver agreement was perfect (kappa, 1.00), and the interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa range, 0.83-1.00) (P<.001 for both). Pattern 1, consisting of dark lacunae and whitish veil, exhibited a sensitivity of 84.4% and a specificity of 99.1% and was not found in malignant melanomas or pigmented basal cell carcinomas. The positive predictive value was 93.1%, the negative predictive value was 97.8%, the intraobserver agreement was perfect (kappa, 1.00), and the interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa range, 0.83-1.00) (P<.001 for all). Conclusion Dermoscopy is helpful in improving the diagnostic accuracy of solitary angiokeratomas and allows the observer to differentiate them from other cutaneous tumors such as malignant melanomas and pigmented basal cell carcinomas.

[1]  Gianluca Petrillo,et al.  Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[2]  R. Braun,et al.  Principles of dermoscopy , 2004 .

[3]  M. G. Fleming,et al.  Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[4]  Harold S Rabinovitz,et al.  Dermoscopy of pigmented seborrheic keratosis: a morphological study. , 2002, Archives of dermatology.

[5]  I. Wolf Dermoscopic diagnosis of vascular lesions. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[6]  P. Aegerter,et al.  Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[7]  H. Vala,et al.  A Case of Angiokeratoma , 2001, Veterinary pathology.

[8]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Central white scarlike patch: a dermatoscopic clue for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  S. Menzies,et al.  Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. , 2000, Archives of dermatology.

[10]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Dermatoscopic pitfalls in differentiating pigmented Spitz naevi from cutaneous melanomas , 1999, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  H. Kerl,et al.  Simulators of malignant melanoma of the skin. , 1998, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[12]  L. Requena,et al.  Cutaneous vascular anomalies. Part I. Hamartomas, malformations, and dilation of preexisting vessels. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  S. H. Gibson,et al.  Thrombotic angiokeratoma circumscriptum simulating melanoma. , 1981, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  E. B. Helwig,et al.  Angiokeratoma. A clinicopathological study. , 1967, Archives of dermatology.

[16]  J. Fabry I. Über einen Fall von Angiokeratoma circumscriptum am linken Oberschenkel , 1915 .

[17]  A. Williams Case of Angio-keratoma , 1911 .

[18]  J. Fabry Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Purpura haemorrhagica nodularis (Purpura papulosa haemorrhagica Hebrae) , 1898, Archiv für Dermatologie und Syphilis.

[19]  W. Anderson A CASE OF “ANGEIO‐KERATOMA.” * , 1898 .

[20]  N. Levine,et al.  Angiokeratoma of scrotum , 2004 .

[21]  P. Itin,et al.  Angiokeratomas: an update. , 1996, Dermatology.

[22]  W. Dillon,et al.  Color Atlas of Dermatoscopy , 1996 .

[23]  J. Linares Solano,et al.  [Angiokeratoma. Apropos of 93 cases]. , 1988, Medicina cutanea ibero-latino-americana.