Tool Use and Constructions Commentary on Krist Vaesen (2012) The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences .

Abstract We examine tool use in relation to the capacity of animals for construction, contrasting tools and nests; place human tool use in a more general problem-solving context, revisiting the body schema in the process; and relate the evolution of language and of tool use. Main text Tools versus Nests: Many creatures can use tools of a specific kind and in come cases even make them, as do New Caledonian crows (Hunt, 1996; Weir, Chappell, & Kacelnik, 2002). Lefebvre et al. (2002) conclude that the complex cognitive processes involved in tool use may have independently co-evolved with large brains in several orders of corvine and passerine birds. Nonetheless, it seems to me that nest building by birds is even more impressive than their tool making and, indeed, Hansell & Ruxton (2008) urge that we view tool behaviors as a limited subclass of construction behavior. Nest building in birds has been a key driver of habitat diversification and speciation in these groups (Collias, 1997; Hansell, 2000). It is thus intriguing that Stewart, Piel, and McGrew (2011) show that re-use of specific nest sites by savanna chimpanzees may be a result of “niche construction” (Iriki & Taoka, 2011; Laland, Odling-Smee, & Feldman, 2000) through formation of good building sites within trees. They speculate that environmental modification through construction behavior may have influenced both chimpanzee and early hominin ranging by leaving behind recognizable patterns of artifact deposition across the landscape.

[1]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Précis of How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis , 2012, Language and Cognition.

[2]  W. McGrew,et al.  Living archaeology: artefacts of specific nest site fidelity in wild chimpanzees. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[3]  M. Arbib From Mirror Neurons to Complex Imitation in the Evolution of Language and Tool Use , 2011 .

[4]  D. Stout Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Arbib,et al.  Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector , 2009, Psychological research.

[6]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Describing visual scenes: Towards a neurolinguistics based on construction grammar , 2008, Brain Research.

[7]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Mike Hansell,et al.  Setting tool use within the context of animal construction behaviour. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  A. Verhagen Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition , 2007 .

[10]  David Kemmerer,et al.  Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System: Action verbs, argument structure constructions, and the mirror neuron system , 2006 .

[11]  M. Arbib From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Adele E. Goldberg Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Shaping of Hooks in New Caledonian Crows , 2002, Science.

[14]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Tools and brains in birds , 2002 .

[15]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[16]  M. Feldman,et al.  Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  M. Hansell Bird Nests and Construction Behavior , 2000 .

[18]  N. Collias On the Origin and Evolution of Nest Building by Passerine Birds , 1997 .

[19]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[20]  G. Hunt Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows , 1996, Nature.