Optimal airfoil shapes for low Reynolds number flows

Flow over NACA 0012 airfoil is studied at α = 4∘ and 12∘ for Re⩽500. It is seen that the flow is very sensitive to Re. A continuous adjoint based method is formulated and implemented for the design of airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. The airfoil shape is parametrized with a non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS). Optimization studies are carried out using different objective functions namely: (1) minimize drag, (2) maximize lift, (3) maximize lift to drag ratio, (4) minimize drag and maximize lift and (5) minimize drag at constant lift. The effect of Reynolds number and definition of the objective function on the optimization process is investigated. Very interesting shapes are discovered at low Re. It is found that, for the range of Re studied, none of the objective functions considered show a clear preference with respect to the maximum lift that can be achieved. The five objective functions result in fairly diverse geometries. With the addition of an inverse constraint on the volume of the airfoil the range of optimal shapes, produced by different objective functions, is smaller. The non-monotonic behavior of the objective functions with respect to the design variables is demonstrated. The effect of the number of design parameters on the optimal shapes is studied. As expected, richer design space leads to geometries with better aerodynamic properties. This study demonstrates the need to consider several objective functions to achieve an optimal design when an algorithm that seeks local optima is used. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Gene Hou,et al.  Shape-sensitivity analysis and design optimization of linear, thermoelastic solids , 1992 .

[2]  Rajkumar Thirumalainambi,et al.  Micro-Flying Robotics in Space Missions , 2005 .

[3]  Eastman N. Jacobs,et al.  Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number , 1939 .

[4]  Joel Brezillon,et al.  2D and 3D aerodynamic shape optimisation using the adjoint approach , 2004 .

[5]  Quanhua Sun,et al.  Flat-plate aerodynamics at very low Reynolds number , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Genetic optimization of target pressure distributions for inverse design methods , 1996 .

[7]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Airfoil Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows , 1999 .

[8]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Feby Abraham,et al.  Stabilized finite element solution of optimal control problems in computational fluid dynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Preconditioned multigrid methods for two-dimensional combustion calculations at all speeds , 1998 .

[11]  Shigeru Sunada,et al.  Airfoil Section Characteristics at a Low Reynolds Number , 1997 .

[12]  A. Jameson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACH TO AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[13]  J. C. Newman,et al.  Computationally efficient, numerically exact design space derivatives via the complex Taylor's series expansion method , 2003 .

[14]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[15]  Gene Hou,et al.  First- and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods , 1996 .

[16]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  O. Pironneau.  On optimum profiles in Stokes flow , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  A. Thom,et al.  The Forces on an Aerofoil at Very Low Speeds , 1940, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[19]  O. Pironneau.  On optimum design in fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[20]  S. Mittal,et al.  Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements , 1992 .

[21]  Peter J. Kunz,et al.  Aerodynamics and design for ultra-low Reynolds number flight , 2003 .

[22]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  MICRO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL-SYSTEMS (MEMS) AND FLUID FLOWS , 1998 .

[23]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications , 2001 .

[24]  Mutsuto Kawahara,et al.  Optimal shape determination of a body located in incompressible viscous fluid flow , 2007 .

[25]  A. Jameson,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION , 2001 .

[26]  S. Mittal,et al.  A stabilized finite element method for shape optimization in low Reynolds number flows , 2007 .