Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers' subsequent pronunciations.

[1]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[2]  D. Klatt.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .

[4]  A. Bell.  Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[5]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  G. Dell,et al.  Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[8]  R. H. Bernacki,et al.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[10]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[11]  Klaus J. Kohler,et al.  Segmental Reduction in Connected Speech in German: Phonological Facts and Phonetic Explanations , 1990 .

[12]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[13]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[14]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[15]  Jean E. Fox Tree,et al.  Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking , 1997, Cognition.

[16]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. , 1997, Science.

[17]  D. Barr,et al.  The Egocentric Basis of Language Use , 1998 .

[18]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[19]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[20]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. , 1998, Science.

[21]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Predicting hyperarticulate speech during human-computer error resolution , 1998, Speech Commun..

[22]  S Oviatt,et al.  Modeling global and focal hyperarticulation during human-computer error resolution. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker , 1999 .

[24]  Elizabeth A. Strand.  Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception , 1999 .

[25]  Nancy Niedzielski,et al.  The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables , 1999 .

[26]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[28]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[30]  Jennifer Hay.  Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women , 2000 .

[31]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[32]  D. Burnham,et al.  What's New, Pussycat? On Talking to Babies and Animals , 2002, Science.

[33]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Brennan,et al.  Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[36]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Style and Sociolinguistic Variation: Register variation and social dialect variation: the Register Axiom , 2002 .

[37]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: patterns of variation in vowel duration , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[39]  M. Landy,et al.  Optimal Compensation for Changes in Task-Relevant Movement Variability , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  William S. Horton,et al.  Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production , 2005 .

[41]  K. Munhall,et al.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  A. Wedel.  Exemplar models, evolution and language change , 2006 .

[43]  J. Perkell,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Maria Uther,et al.  Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech , 2007, Speech Commun..

[46]  Ian McGraw,et al.  The WAMI toolkit for developing, deploying, and evaluating web-accessible multimodal interfaces , 2008, ICMI '08.

[47]  Amanda Stent,et al.  Adapting speaking after evidence of misrecognition: Local and global hyperarticulation , 2008, Speech Commun..

[48]  L. S. Casasanto.  Does Social Information Influence Sentence Processing , 2008 .

[49]  M. Landy,et al.  Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Laura Staum.  Does Social Information Influence Sentence Processing , 2008 .

[51]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Real-Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  S. G. Guion,et al.  Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .

[54]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues , 2008, Cognition.

[55]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  A. Samuel,et al.  First Impressions and Last Resorts , 2008, Psychological science.

[57]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Mechanisms of interaction in speech production , 2009, Language and cognitive processes.

[58]  Boaz Keysar,et al.  Less Is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[60]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  Kristiina Jokinen,et al.  Gaze and Gesture Activity in Communication , 2009, HCI.

[63]  S. Brennan,et al.  Attenuating Information in Spoken Communication: For the Speaker, or for the Addressee?. , 2010 .

[64]  Kathryn Campbell-Kibler,et al.  The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning , 2010, Language Variation and Change.

[65]  Brenda Rapp,et al.  Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[66]  Molly Babel.  Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English , 2010, Language in Society.

[67]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[68]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception , 2010 .

[69]  Marianne Pouplier,et al.  Intention in articulation: Articulatory timing in alternating consonant sequences and its implications for models of speech production , 2010, Language and cognitive processes.

[70]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Awareness of Central Luminance Edge Is Crucial for the Craik-o'brien-cornsweet Effect , 2022 .

[71]  Frank H Guenther,et al.  The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[72]  Melissa Baese-Berk,et al.  Phonological Neighborhood Effects in Spoken Word Production: An fMRI Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[73]  J. Hay,et al.  Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access , 2011 .

[74]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Speech Production as State Feedback Control , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[75]  Christo Kirov,et al.  The Specificity of Online Variation in Speech Production , 2012, CogSci.

[76]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  A processing-centered look at the contribution of givenness to durational reduction , 2012 .

[78]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  A continuum of phonetic adaptation: Evaluating an incremental belief-updating model of recalibration and selective adaptation , 2012, CogSci.

[79]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[80]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Incremental Phonological Encoding during Unscripted Sentence Production , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[81]  Andrea Weber,et al.  When One Person's Mistake Is Another's Standard Usage: The Effect of Foreign Accent on Syntactic Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  T Florian Jaeger,et al.  Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  G. Hickok.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[84]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  Seeking predictions from a predictive framework , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[85]  Christo Kirov,et al.  Bayesian Speech Production: Evidence from Latency and Hyperarticulation , 2013, CogSci.

[86]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[88]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual capture and the experience of having two bodies – Evidence from two different virtual reality techniques , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[89]  Jessamyn Schertz,et al.  Exaggeration of featural contrasts in clarifications of misheard speech in English , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[90]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Mechanisms for Listener-Adaptation in Language Production: Limiting the Role of the "Model of the Listener" , 2013 .

[91]  Anna K. Kuhlen,et al.  Language in Dialogue: When Confederates Might Be Hazardous to Your Data , 2022 .

[92]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Production preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[93]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Contextual confusability leads to targeted hyperarticulation , 2014, CogSci.

[94]  Matthew A Goldrick,et al.  Gradient co-activation and speech error articulation: comment on Pouplier and Goldstein (2010) , 2014 .

[95]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Socially-mediated syntactic alignment , 2014, Language Variation and Change.

[96]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between planning and execution is more than duration: response to Goldrick & Chu , 2014 .

[97]  Jennifer Hay,et al.  Contextual activation of Australia can affect New Zealanders' vowel productions , 2015, J. Phonetics.

[98]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Synthesising meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[99]  J. Hay,et al.  The Emergence of Sociophonetic Structure , 2015 .

[100]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  The Effect of Phonological Encoding on Word Duration: Selection Takes Time , 2015 .

[101]  Dave F. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. , 2015, Psychological review.

[102]  Neal P. Fox,et al.  Phonological Neighborhood Competition Affects Spoken Word Production Irrespective of Sentential Context. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[103]  Rajeev D. S. Raizada,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised learning in phonetic adaptation , 2015, CogSci.

[104]  Sharon Goldwater,et al.  Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently , 2015 .

[105]  Sanjeev Khudanpur,et al.  Structured variability in acoustic realization: a corpus study of voice onset time in American English stops , 2015, ICPhS.

[106]  Rachel Ryskin,et al.  People as contexts in conversation , 2015 .

[107]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Mothers Speak Less Clearly to Infants Than to Adults: A Comprehensive Test of the Hyperarticulation Hypothesis , 2015, Psychological science.

[108]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast , 2015, J. Phonetics.

[109]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[110]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Speech Perception and Generalization Across Talkers and Accents , 2016 .

[111]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Revisiting the Memory-Based Processing Approach to Common Ground , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[112]  Gina R Kuperberg,et al.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[113]  Esteban Buz,et al.  The (in)dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[114]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Dimensions of similarity in the mental lexicon , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[115]  Esteban Buz,et al.  Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.