Rate Matrices for Analyzing Large Families of Protein Sequences

We propose and study a new approach for the analysis of families of protein sequences. This method is related to the LogDet distances used in phylogenetic reconstructions; it can be viewed as an attempt to embed these distances into a multidimensional framework. The proposed method starts by associating a Markov matrix to each pairwise alignment deduced from a given multiple alignment. The central objects under consideration here are matrix-valued logarithms L of these Markov matrices, which exist under conditions that are compatible with fairly large divergence between the sequences. These logarithms allow us to compare data from a family of aligned proteins with simple models (in particular, continuous reversible Markov models) and to test the adequacy of such models. If one neglects fluctuations arising from the finite length of sequences, any continuous reversible Markov model with a single rate matrix Q over an arbitrary tree predicts that all the observed matrices L are multiples of Q. Our method exploits this fact, without relying on any tree estimation. We test this prediction on a family of proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome of 26 multicellular animals, which include vertebrates, arthropods, echinoderms, molluscs, and nematodes. A principal component analysis of the observed matrices L shows that a single rate model can be used as a rough approximation to the data, but that systematic deviations from any such model are unmistakable and related to the evolutionary history of the species under consideration.

[1]  David C. Jones,et al.  A mutation data matrix for transmembrane proteins , 1994, FEBS letters.

[2]  J. Lake,et al.  Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. O. Dayhoff,et al.  22 A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins , 1978 .

[4]  M. Steel,et al.  Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  J. Hartigan,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Hominoid Molecular Evolution , 1987 .

[6]  S. Tavaré Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences , 1986 .

[7]  Durbin,et al.  Biological Sequence Analysis , 1998 .

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  F. Ayala Molecular systematics , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids , 1998 .

[11]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  M. O. Dayhoff,et al.  Establishing homologies in protein sequences. , 1983, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  G. Larry Bretthorst,et al.  Estimating the Parameters , 1988 .

[14]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Amino acid substitution of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA during mammalian evolution. , 1992, Idengaku zasshi.

[15]  Arnold Zellner,et al.  Estimating the parameters of the Markov probability model from aggregate time series data , 1971 .

[16]  N Takezaki,et al.  Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Modeling Amino Acid Replacement , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..