A Wizard-of-Oz experimental approach to study the human factors of automated vehicles: Platform and methods evaluation

OBJECTIVES Driving simulation is an important platform for studying vehicle automation. There are different approaches to using this platform - with most using scripting or programmatic tools to simulate vehicle automation. A less frequently used approach, the Wizard-of-Oz method, has potential for increased flexibility and efficiency in designing and conducting experiments. This study designed and evaluated an experimental setup to examine the feasibility of this approach as an alternative for conducting automation studies. METHODS Twenty-four participants experienced simulated vehicle automation in two platforms, one where the automation was controlled by algorithms, and the other where the automation was simulated by an external operator. Surveys were administered after each drive and the drivers' takeover performance after the automation disengaged was measured. RESULTS Results indicate that while the kinematic parameters of the driving differed significantly for the two platforms, there were no significant differences in the perceptions of participants and in their takeover performance between the two platforms. CONCLUSION These results provide evidence for the use of alternative approaches for the conduct of human factors studies on vehicle automation, potentially lowering barriers to undertaking such experiments while increasing flexibility in designing more complex studies.

[1]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Effects of non-driving related tasks in prolonged conditional automated driving – A Wizard of Oz on-road approach in real traffic environment , 2019 .

[2]  Paul Green,et al.  The Rapid Development of User Interfaces: Experience with the Wizard of OZ Method , 1985 .

[3]  R. Happee,et al.  A human factors perspective on automated driving , 2017 .

[4]  Veronika Weinbeer,et al.  Using the wizard of Oz paradigm to prototype automated vehicles: methodological challenges , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[5]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  N A Stanton,et al.  Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Bobbie Seppelt,et al.  Potential Solutions to Human Factors Challenges in Road Vehicle Automation , 2016 .

[8]  Ian J Reagan,et al.  Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[10]  Takuji Narumi,et al.  Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers—A driving simulator study , 2019, Traffic injury prevention.

[11]  Lisa J. Molnar,et al.  Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[12]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Understanding Driver-Automated Vehicle Interactions Through Wizard of Oz Design Improvisation , 2017 .

[13]  Dawn M. Tilbury,et al.  Examining the Effects of Emotional Valence and Arousal on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[14]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[15]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[16]  P A Hancock,et al.  Some pitfalls in the promises of automated and autonomous vehicles , 2019, Ergonomics.