Probing the effect of promoters on noise in gene expression using thousands of designed sequences

Genetically identical cells exhibit large variability (noise) in gene expression, with important consequences for cellular function. Although the amount of noise decreases with and is thus partly determined by the mean expression level, the extent to which different promoter sequences can deviate away from this trend is not fully known. Here, we present a high-throughput method for measuring promoter-driven noise for thousands of designed synthetic promoters in parallel. We use it to investigate how promoters encode different noise levels and find that the noise levels of promoters with similar mean expression levels can vary more than one order of magnitude, with nucleosome-disfavoring sequences resulting in lower noise and more transcription factor binding sites resulting in higher noise. We propose a kinetic model of gene expression that takes into account the nonspecific DNA binding and one-dimensional sliding along the DNA, which occurs when transcription factors search for their target sites. We show that this assumption can improve the prediction of the mean-independent component of expression noise for our designed promoter sequences, suggesting that a transcription factor target search may affect gene expression noise. Consistent with our findings in designed promoters, we find that binding-site multiplicity in native promoters is associated with higher expression noise. Overall, our results demonstrate that small changes in promoter DNA sequence can tune noise levels in a manner that is predictable and partly decoupled from effects on the mean expression levels. These insights may assist in designing promoters with desired noise levels.

[1]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Chromosomal position effects are linked to sir2-mediated variation in transcriptional burst size. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[2]  L. Mirny,et al.  Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[3]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation , 2012, Science.

[4]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[5]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[6]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Johan Elf,et al.  Effects of macromolecular crowding and DNA looping on gene regulation kinetics , 2009 .

[8]  J. Widom,et al.  Collaborative Competition Mechanism for Gene Activation In Vivo , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  Lijiang Yang,et al.  Probing Allostery Through DNA , 2013, Science.

[10]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[11]  J. Paulsson Summing up the noise in gene networks , 2004, Nature.

[12]  R. Mitra,et al.  TATA is a modular component of synthetic promoters. , 2010, Genome research.

[13]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[15]  Mikhail Pachkov,et al.  SwissRegulon, a database of genome-wide annotations of regulatory sites: recent updates , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  H. J. Beaumont,et al.  Experimental evolution of bet hedging , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Jared E. Toettcher,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Lentiviral Positive-Feedback Loop: HIV-1 Tat Fluctuations Drive Phenotypic Diversity , 2005, Cell.

[18]  R. Milo,et al.  Promoters maintain their relative activity levels under different growth conditions , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[20]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[21]  H. J. Beaumont,et al.  The evolutionary emergence of stochastic phenotype switching in bacteria , 2011, Microbial cell factories.

[22]  David J. Arenillas,et al.  JASPAR 2010: the greatly expanded open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[24]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[25]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[26]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[27]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[28]  Marc S. Sherman,et al.  A Computational Framework for Analyzing Stochasticity in Gene Expression , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[30]  M Ptashne,et al.  Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Ben Lehner Conflict between Noise and Plasticity in Yeast , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[32]  Young-Joon Kim,et al.  Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Eran Segal,et al.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[36]  R. Segev,et al.  GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL TIME-SERIES IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[37]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[38]  Johan Elf,et al.  The lac Repressor Displays Facilitated Diffusion in Living Cells , 2012, Science.

[39]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[41]  Eran Segal,et al.  Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise , 2013, Genome research.

[42]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Building Enhancers from the Ground Up: A Synthetic Biology Approach , 2011, Cell.

[44]  A. Visel,et al.  Homotypic clusters of transcription factor binding sites are a key component of human promoters and enhancers. , 2010, Genome research.

[45]  J. Paulsson,et al.  Effects of Molecular Memory and Bursting on Fluctuations in Gene Expression , 2008, Science.

[46]  Emily M. LeProust,et al.  Synthesis of high-quality libraries of long (150mer) oligonucleotides by a novel depurination controlled process , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[48]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Effect of Promoter Architecture on the Cell-to-Cell Variability in Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  Peter M. A. Sloot,et al.  Promoter Sequence Determines the Relationship between Expression Level and Noise , 2013, PLoS biology.

[50]  N. Khazanov,et al.  Asymmetric DNA-search dynamics by symmetric dimeric proteins. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[51]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Noise–mean relationship in mutated promoters , 2012, Genome research.

[52]  E. Segal,et al.  The grammar of transcriptional regulation , 2014, Human Genetics.

[53]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.