Precision livestock production: tools and concepts

Precision livestock production (PLP) is the augmentation of precision agriculture (PA) concepts to include all components of agroecosystems, particularly animals and plant-animal interactions. Soil, plants and soil-plant interactions are the subjects of PA or site-specific farming, where the main principle is to exploit natural spatial heterogeneity to increase efficiency and reduce environmental impacts. For the most part, PA has been studied and developed for intensive cropping systems with little attention devoted to pastoral and agropastoral systems. PLP focuses on the animal component and exploits heterogeneity in space and among individual animals towards more efficient and environmentally friendly production. Within PLP, precision grazing consists of the integration of information and communication technologies with knowledge about animal behavior and physiology to improve production of meat, milk and wool in grazing conditions. Two main goals are to minimize overgrazing of sensitive areas and to maximize the quality of the product through enhanced traceability. An integrated precision grazing system is outlined with its components: sensors of animal position, behavior and physiological status, real-time transmission of information to a decision support system, and feed-back through a series of actuators. Control of animal movement and diets is based on knowledge about species specific responses to various stimuli within the paradigms of flavor aversions and operant conditioning. Recent advances in the technologies and instrumentation available are reviewed briefly and linked to current livestock identification systems. The precision grazing vision is presented in full and the areas that need further research and development are discussed.

[1]  B. Kimball,et al.  Importance of alternative foods on the persistence of flavor aversions: implications for applied flavor avoidance learning , 2002 .

[2]  M. Coffey,et al.  Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Yael Edan,et al.  Automatic Weighing of Dairy Cows , 1993 .

[4]  F. Provenza,et al.  Effects of energy source and food flavor on conditioned preferences in sheep. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[5]  E. Charmley,et al.  Development of a remote method for the recording of cattle weights under field conditions , 2006 .

[6]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep , 1996 .

[7]  Andreas Buerkert,et al.  Performance of three GPS collars to monitor goats' grazing itineraries on mountain pastures , 2009 .

[8]  F. Provenza,et al.  Nutrient-specific preferences by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch, casein, and water. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[9]  F. Provenza,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of Frederick D Provenza 2000 Roles of novelty , generalization , and postingestive feedback in the recognition of foods by lambs , 2018 .

[10]  F. Provenza,et al.  Effect of an unfamiliar location on the consumption of novel and familiar foods by sheep , 1997 .

[11]  Matthias Rothmund,et al.  Precision agriculture on grassland : Applications, perspectives and constraints , 2008 .

[12]  K. Uetake,et al.  Visual dominance over hearing in feed acquisition procedure of cattle , 1994 .

[13]  B. Skinner Diagramming schedules of reinforcement. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  K. Myers Robust preference for a flavor paired with intragastric glucose acquired in a single trial , 2007, Appetite.

[15]  Training cows to approach the milking unit in response to acoustic signals in an automatic milking system during the grazing season , 2006 .

[16]  E. Laca Spatial memory and food searching mechanisms of cattle , 1998 .

[17]  F. Provenza,et al.  Discriminating among novel foods: effects of energy provision on preferences of lambs for poor-quality foods , 2000 .

[18]  F. Provenza,et al.  Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  F. Provenza,et al.  Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of sodium propionate. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[20]  B. Dumont,et al.  Generalization of conditioned food aversions in grazing sheep and its implications for food categorization , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[21]  Michael D. Johnson,et al.  An Advanced, Low-Cost, GPS-Based Animal Tracking System , 2006 .

[22]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of chewing and intake of fresh and dry forages in steers , 2006 .

[23]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  SUITABILITY OF A GPS COLLAR FOR GRAZING STUDIES , 2004 .

[24]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Robust classification of animal tracking data , 2007 .

[25]  F. Provenza,et al.  Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch administered at different times after straw ingestion. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[26]  Toby Mottram,et al.  Automatic monitoring of the health and metabolic status of dairy cows , 1997 .

[27]  F. Provenza,et al.  Overcoming Food Neophobia in Domestic Ruminants through Addition of a Familiar Flavor and Repeated Exposure to Novel Foods , 1997 .

[28]  K. Stanford,et al.  Traceability in cattle and small ruminants in Canada. , 2001, Revue scientifique et technique.

[29]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  From Robots to Animals: Virtual Fences for Controlling Cattle , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[30]  Yael Edan,et al.  A real-time control system for individual dairy cow food intake , 1998 .

[31]  Matti Pastell,et al.  Automatic observation of cow leg health using load sensors , 2008 .

[32]  F. Provenza,et al.  Learning and Dietary Choice in Herbivores , 2009 .

[33]  F. Provenza,et al.  Social influences on conditioned food aversions in sheep , 1990 .

[34]  F. Provenza,et al.  Food aversion conditioned in anesthetized sheep , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[35]  Diego H. Milone,et al.  Computational method for segmentation and classification of ingestive sounds in sheep , 2009 .

[36]  C. Mccall,et al.  Equine utilization of secondary reinforcement during response extinction and acquisition , 2002 .

[37]  R. Firk,et al.  Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review , 2002 .

[38]  J. A. Lines,et al.  A review of livestock monitoring and the need for integrated systems , 1997 .

[39]  A. Dolev,et al.  Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: Use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[40]  Gerd Nürnberg,et al.  Learning to learn during visual discrimination in group housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus). , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[41]  Werner Härdtle,et al.  Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large-scale pasture landscape: A GPS/GIS assessment , 2008 .

[42]  M. Demment,et al.  Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales , 1997, Oecologia.

[43]  F. Provenza,et al.  Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of acetate and propionate. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[44]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  Mechanisms of handling time and intake rate of a large mammalian grazer , 1994 .

[45]  Laca,et al.  Acoustic measurement of intake and grazing behaviour of cattle , 2000 .

[46]  F. Provenza Postingestive Feedback as an Elementary Determinant of Food Preference and Intake in Ruminants , 1995 .

[47]  Matti Pastell,et al.  Detecting cow's lameness using force sensors , 2008 .

[48]  Juan J. Villalba,et al.  The Value to Herbivores of Plant Physical and Chemical Diversity in Time and Space , 2007 .

[49]  Juan J. Villalba,et al.  Sheep self-medicate when challenged with illness-inducing foods , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  J. Langbein,et al.  Self-controlled visual discrimination learning of group-housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus): behavioral strategies and effects of relocation on learning and memory. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[51]  F. Provenza,et al.  Herbivore response to anti-quality factors in forages. , 2001 .

[52]  F. Provenza,et al.  Conditioned taste aversions: how sick must a ruminant get before it learns about toxicity in foods? , 1991 .

[53]  T. Friend,et al.  The efficacy of a secondary reinforcer (clicker) during acquisition and extinction of an operant task in horses , 2004 .

[54]  Roger A. Eigenberg,et al.  Sensors for dynamic physiological measurements , 2008 .

[55]  J. Bewley,et al.  Comparison of reticular and rectal core body temperatures in lactating dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[57]  Amit Gutman Inference of Animal Activity From GPS Collar Data on Free-Ranging Cattle , 2005 .

[58]  J. Langbein,et al.  The impact of acoustical secondary reinforcement during shape discrimination learning of dwarf goats (Capra hircus) , 2007 .

[59]  Bertrand Dumont,et al.  Response of foraging sheep to variability in the spatial distribution of resources , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[61]  Dean M. Anderson,et al.  Virtual fencing--past, present and future , 2007 .

[62]  S. M. Rutter,et al.  An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants , 1997 .

[63]  Pavan Sikka,et al.  Virtual fencing applications: Implementing and testing an automated cattle control system , 2007, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.

[64]  F. Provenza,et al.  Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch , 1997, British Journal of Nutrition.

[65]  S. M. Rutter,et al.  An automatic system to monitor lying, standing and walking behaviour of grazing animals , 1997 .

[66]  F. Provenza Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of Frederick D Provenza 1996 Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands , 2018 .

[67]  Eugene D. Ungar,et al.  Classifying cattle jaw movements: Comparing IGER Behaviour Recorder and acoustic techniques , 2006 .