Does the rise of the Internet bring erosion of strong ties? Analyses of social media use and changes in core discussion networks

We derive hypotheses from popular accounts of how use of social media affects our strong ties. Several authors have suggested that social media use erodes our strong ties by increasing the volume of social interactions and decreasing their depth. Using two-wave panel data representative of the Dutch population between 15 and 45 years, we examine changes in the core discussion networks (CDNs) of 5312 respondents (with 10,896 relations). Contradicting an erosion of strong ties, we found positive effects of social media use on CDN size, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Social media use was positively related to talking to CDN members in our cross-sectional model. Finally, we found that the CDNs of frequent social media users were more dynamic than those of less frequent users: they are more likely to both lose old and gain new ties. This suggests that Internet use is associated with more, and more dynamic, social interaction.

[1]  P. Dekker,et al.  Dissolution of Associational Life? Testing the Individualization and Informalization Hypotheses on Leisure Activities in The Netherlands Between 1975 and 2005 , 2010, Social indicators research.

[2]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  Mario Luis Small,et al.  How stable is the core discussion network? , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[4]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  EXPLAINING COMMUNICATION DISPLACEMENT AND LARGE-SCALE SOCIAL CHANGE IN CORE NETWORKS , 2013 .

[5]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[6]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[7]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[8]  E. Laumann,et al.  The Social Connectedness of Older Adults: A National Profile , 2008, American sociological review.

[9]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[10]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference with Clustered Data , 2010 .

[11]  C. Day,et al.  Smart Phones and Mediated Relationships: The Changing Face of Relational Communication , 2015 .

[12]  Bernice A. Pescosolido,et al.  “Sorry, I forgot”: the role of recall error in longitudinal personal network studies , 2002 .

[13]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Social media and political discussion: when online presence silences offline conversation , 2017 .

[14]  Antony Palackal,et al.  Mobile phones and core network growth in Kenya: Strengthening weak ties , 2011 .

[15]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[16]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Recent Developments in Network Measurement , 2005 .

[17]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Michael J. Stern,et al.  HOW LOCALITY, FREQUENCY OF COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET USAGE AFFECT MODES OF COMMUNICATION WITHIN CORE SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[19]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of American discussion networks , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[20]  Jeffrey Boase,et al.  Core Discussion Networks in Japan and America , 2012 .

[21]  Anthony Paik,et al.  Social Isolation in America: An Artifact , 2013 .

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[23]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph , 2011, ArXiv.

[24]  B. H. Mayhew,,et al.  Size and the Density of Interaction in Human Aggregates , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[27]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[28]  Alain Degenne Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[29]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Social Networking Sites: Their Users and Social Implications - A Longitudinal Study , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Wenhong Chen,et al.  Internet Use, Online Communication, and Ties in Americans’ Networks , 2013 .

[31]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007 , 2010 .

[32]  David L. Morgan,et al.  The stability of core and peripheral networks over time , 1997 .

[33]  J. Jonides,et al.  Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review , 2017 .

[34]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model , 2006 .

[35]  Andreas Wittel Toward a Network Sociality , 2001 .

[36]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Predictors of mobilizing online coping versus offline coping resources after negative life events , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[38]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[39]  Beate Völker,et al.  Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[40]  Chang-Hyun Jin Social Capital Index , 2015 .

[41]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[42]  Mario Luis Small,et al.  Weak ties and the core discussion network: Why people regularly discuss important matters with unimportant alters , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[43]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: Questionnaire design issues , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[44]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social Network Site Affordances and Their Relationship to Social Capital Processes , 2015 .

[45]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[46]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[47]  B. Wellman Computer Networks As Social Networks , 2001, Science.

[48]  Paolo Parigi,et al.  Social Isolation in America , 2014 .

[49]  Marcus Ynalvez,et al.  Are mobile phones changing social networks? A longitudinal study of core networks in Kerala , 2011, New Media Soc..

[50]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[51]  StataCorp Stata User's Guide: Release 15. , 2017 .

[52]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact? , 2009 .

[53]  Barry Wellman,et al.  A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities☆ , 1997 .

[54]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[55]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering , 2011 .

[56]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Does social network site use buffer against well-being loss when older adults face reduced functional ability? , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  P. Bearman,et al.  Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure , 2004 .

[58]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  CORE NETWORKS, SOCIAL ISOLATION, AND NEW MEDIA , 2011 .

[59]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use , 2014, CHI.

[60]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[61]  E. V. Ingen,et al.  Social Network Site Usage and Personal Relations of Migrants , 2014 .

[62]  Keith N. Hampton Persistent and Pervasive Community , 2016 .

[63]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[64]  Silvio Waisbord,et al.  Populist communication by digital means: presidential Twitter in Latin America , 2017 .

[65]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  ‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape , 2004 .

[66]  Benjamin Cornwell,et al.  Assessment of social network change in a national longitudinal survey. , 2014, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[67]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support , 2017, New Media Soc..

[68]  N. Milburn To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1983 .