Measuring the performance of knowledge resources using a value perspective: integrating BSC and ANP

Purpose – This paper aims to provide insight into how knowledge resources in R & D organizations can be effectively and separately measured for knowledge sharing and transfer. Knowledge is recognized as a durable strategic resource to obtain sustainable competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach – The paper proposes a theoretical framework integrating an analytic network process (ANP) with a balanced scorecard (BSC) to measure the performance of knowledge resources under value perspective. Four indicators and three knowledge value (KV) components including labor value, technology value and utilization value are discussed. The model construction, problem structuring and calculation procedure for measuring the performance of knowledge resources based on ANP and BSC are demonstrated. Findings – Despite a number of models to assess the performance of knowledge resources being proposed, they highlighted a need for separately measuring under value perspective. With the aim of filling this gap, the main ...

[1]  Chi-Wei Lee,et al.  Understanding m-commerce payment systems through the analytic hierarchy process , 2004 .

[2]  E. Nijssen,et al.  Performance effects of using the Balanced Scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience , 2004 .

[3]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[4]  Sheng-Tun Li,et al.  Exploiting and transferring presentational knowledge assets in R&D organizations , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Dianne P. Ford,et al.  Perceived value of knowledge: the potential informer's perception , 2006 .

[6]  R. Armacost,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process for bank management: Analysis of consumer bank selection decisions , 1989 .

[7]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Malcolm J. Beynon,et al.  An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNMTM): An evaluation of knowledge management maturity , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Tsung-Yi Chen,et al.  Value ontology-based multi-aspect intellectual asset valuation method for decision-making support in k-commerce , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[13]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  Knowledge assets value creation map: Assessing knowledge assets value drivers using AHP , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  K. Desouza,et al.  Factors governing the consumption of explicit knowledge , 2006 .

[15]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The Intangible Assets Monitor , 1997 .

[16]  Hang Nguyen,et al.  Cross-generational knowledge flows in edge organizations , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  N. Bontis Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital , 2001 .

[18]  M. Malone,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower , 1997 .

[19]  Ravi Arora,et al.  Implementing KM - a balanced score card approach , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic network process model , 2014 .

[21]  Y. L. Chan An Analytic Hierarchy Framework for Evaluating Balanced Scorecards of Healthcare Organizations , 2009 .

[22]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  Applying a systems thinking framework to assess knowledge assets dynamics for business performance improvement , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Philip A. Scarf,et al.  On the application of mathematical models in maintenance , 1997 .

[25]  Jinette de Gooijer,et al.  Designing a knowledge management performance framework , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Armando Calabrese,et al.  Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Dentcho N. Batanov,et al.  EXPERT-MM: A knowledge-based system for maintenance management , 1993, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[29]  N. Bontis,et al.  THE KNOWLEDGE TOOLBOX: A Review of the Tools Available To Measure and Manage Intangible Resources , 1999 .

[30]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[31]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2007 .

[32]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  An analytic model for locating facilities strategically , 2006 .

[33]  M. K. Kuzman,et al.  Comparison of some aggregation techniques using group analytic hierarchy process , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Assessing the contribution of knowledge to business performance: the KP3 methodology , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  M. Boisot Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 1998 .

[36]  M. Sharma,et al.  An integrated BSC‐AHP approach for supply chain management evaluation , 2007 .

[37]  Dan N. Stone,et al.  Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  Herman A. van den Berg,et al.  Three shapes of organisational knowledge , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Raúl Rodríguez-Rodríguez,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for managing inter-enterprise collaborative relationships , 2012 .

[41]  Adam Mossoff SAVING LOCKE FROM MARX: THE LABOR THEORY OF VALUE IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEORY* , 2012, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[42]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[43]  Bert van Wegen,et al.  Understanding and valuing knowledge assets: Overview and method , 1997 .

[44]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[46]  Victor B. Kreng,et al.  The construct and application of knowledge diffusion model , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Xue Wang,et al.  Research on the Performance Measurement of Knowledge Management Based on Principal Component Analysis , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications.

[48]  B. Lev Remarks on the Measurement, Valuation, and Reporting of Intangible Assets , 2003 .

[49]  R. de Hoog,et al.  The monetary value of knowledge assets: a micro approach , 2000 .

[50]  Cheng-Hsin Chiang,et al.  Network structure of innovation: can brokerage or closure predict patent quality? , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[51]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[52]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[53]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Knowledge Management performance measurement: measures, approaches, trends and future directions , 2015 .

[54]  He-Yau Kang,et al.  Developing new products with knowledge management methods and process development management in a network , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[55]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Monte Carlo Data Envelopment Analysis with Genetic Algorithm for Knowledge Management performance measurement , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Giovanni Schiuma,et al.  Knowledge assets assessment strategies: organizational value, processes, approaches and evaluation architectures , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[57]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[59]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[60]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  When to Use Focus Groups and Why , 1993 .

[61]  Zhang Ruihong,et al.  The application of the balanced scorecard in performance assessment of knowledge management , 2010, 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering.

[62]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[63]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  H. Saint‐Onge Tacit Knowledge: The Key to the Strategic Alignment of Intellectual Capital , 1996 .

[65]  Thomas L. Albright,et al.  An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance , 2004 .

[66]  Andy Neely,et al.  Intellectual capital - defining key performance indicators for organizational knowledge assets , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[67]  Mu-Yen Chen,et al.  Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: An empirical study , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[68]  Alexandre Veronese Bentes,et al.  Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP☆ , 2010 .

[69]  Arash Shahin,et al.  Prioritization of key performance indicators: An integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting , 2007 .

[70]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[71]  Alain Abran,et al.  A multidimensional performance model for consolidating balanced scorecards , 2003 .

[72]  Robert de Hoog,et al.  Supporting knowledge management: A selection of methods and techniques , 1997 .

[73]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of different project sucess , 2010 .

[74]  Xun Xu,et al.  Recent development of knowledge-based systems, methods and tools for One-of-a-Kind Production , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[75]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement systems—alternate considerations , 2003 .

[76]  Liliane Pintelon,et al.  Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection , 2014 .

[77]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  The knowledge value chain: how intellectual capital impacts on business performance , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[78]  D. J. Murphy Are intellectual property rights compatible with Rawlsian principles of justice? , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.