Title: Objective and Quantitative Assessment of Caries Lesion Activity Short Title: Objective Caries Lesion Activity Assessment

Objectives: Evaluate the ability of objectively measured specular reflection, roughness, and fluorescence change during dehydration to assess caries lesion activity. Methods: One hundred ninety-five ground/polished 3x3x2mm sound human enamel specimens were divided into three groups and demineralized using a multispecies microbial caries model for 3, 6, or 9 days; and then remineralized with 1,100 ppm-F as NaF solution for 10 days using a pH-cyclic model. Reflection (amplitude: %), roughness (Ra: μm), fluorescence change during dehydration (ΔQ: %mm), and microfocus computed tomography [μ-CT: lesion volume (μm)] were measured for sound, demineralized and remineralized enamel. The surface was hydrated and fluorescence images were acquired at 1s intervals for 10s (ΔQ10). During image acquisition, surface was dehydrated with continuous compressed air. Changes-in-ΔQ per second (ΔQD: %mm/sec) at 5 (ΔQD5) and 10s (ΔQD10) were obtained. Results: Reflection decreased from sound to AC CE PT ED M AN US CR IP T ___________________________________________________________________ This is the author's manuscript of the article published in final edited form as: Ando, M., Fontana, M., Eckert, G. J., Arthur, R. A., Zhang, H., & Zero, D. T. (2018). Objective and quantitative assessment of caries lesion activity. Journal of dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.08.009 demineralized groups (p<0.0001); remineralized groups were higher than demineralized groups (p<0.001), but not different from sound (p>0.32). Roughness increased from sound to demineralized groups (p<0.0001) and remineralized groups were also higher than sound (p<0.0001). ΔQ10, ΔQD5 and ΔQD10 increased from sound to demineralized groups (p<0.0001), and remineralized groups decreased compared to demineralized groups (p<0.05), but was higher than sound (p<0.0001). The correlations of μ-CT with reflection, roughness, and ΔQ10 were -0.63, 0.71, and 0.82, respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Reflection, roughness and ΔQ could distinguish between sound and demineralized enamel. Reflection and ΔQ were able to distinguish between demineralized and remineralized enamel. Clinical significance: Determination of caries activity, whether a lesion is active or inactive, is an essential and critical component of caries diagnosis. However, especially for enamel lesions, it is difficult to estimate without longitudinal follow-up. Reflection, roughness and fluorescence change during dehydration have the potential to measure caries lesion activity at a-single-appointment.

[1]  G. Eckert,et al.  Determination of Caries Lesion Activity: Reflection and Roughness for Characterization of Caries Progression. , 2018, Operative dentistry.

[2]  V. Baelum,et al.  Nyvad Criteria for Caries Lesion Activity and Severity Assessment: A Validated Approach for Clinical Management and Research , 2018, Caries Research.

[3]  Praveen Sharma,et al.  Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis – a comprehensive review , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  Masatoshi Ando,et al.  Pilot clinical study to assess caries lesion activity using quantitative light-induced fluorescence during dehydration , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Daniel Fried,et al.  Assessment of remineralization via measurement of dehydration rates with thermal and near-IR reflectance imaging. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  G. Eckert,et al.  Enamel Carious Lesion Development in Response to Sucrose and Fluoride Concentrations and to Time of Biofilm Formation: An Artificial-Mouth Study. , 2014, Journal of oral diseases.

[7]  T M Ardenghi,et al.  Validation of Visual Caries Activity Assessment , 2014, Journal of dental research.

[8]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Exploiting HPC resources for the 3D-time series analysis of caries lesion activity , 2012, XSEDE '12.

[9]  Douglas E. Adams,et al.  Pulse thermography for quantitative nondestructive evaluation of sound, de-mineralized and re-mineralized enamel , 2012, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  B. T. Cate The role of saliva in mineral equilibria - caries, erosion and calculus formation , 2012 .

[11]  A. Lussi,et al.  Evaluation of Perpendicular Reflection Intensity for Assessment of Caries Lesion Activity/Inactivity , 2011, Caries Research.

[12]  Masatoshi Ando,et al.  Ability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) to assess the activity of white spot lesions during dehydration. , 2006, American journal of dentistry.

[13]  N. Pitts,et al.  Visual and Tactile Assessment of Arrested Initial Enamel Carious Lesions: An in vivo Pilot Study , 2005, Caries Research.

[14]  W. Edgar,et al.  The use of in situ models and QLF for the study of coronal caries. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  J. T. ten Bosch,et al.  The Influence of Drying on Quantitative Laser Fluorescence and Optical Pathlengths in Incipient Natural Caries Lesions , 2004, Caries Research.

[16]  A. Banerjee Dental Caries. The Disease and its Clinical Management , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[17]  P. Anderson,et al.  Optical Profilometric Study of Changes in Surface Roughness of Enamel during in vitro Demineralization , 2000, Caries Research.

[18]  George K. Stookey,et al.  Caries activity detection by dehydration with quantitative light fluorescence , 2000 .

[19]  V. Baelum,et al.  Reliability of a New Caries Diagnostic System Differentiating between Active and Inactive Caries Lesions , 1999, Caries Research.

[20]  J. M. ten Cate,et al.  Quantification of Formation and Remineralization of Artificial Enamel Lesions with a New Portable Fluorescence Device , 1997, Advances in dental research.

[21]  G. Stookey,et al.  An in vitro microbial model for studying secondary caries formation. , 1996, Caries research.

[22]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  In Vivo Caries Models-Mechanisms for Caries Initiation and Arrestment , 1994, Advances in dental research.

[23]  White Dj Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. III. Quantitative aspects of acquired acid resistance (AAR): F uptake, retention, surface hardening and remineralization. , 1991 .

[24]  J Artun,et al.  Surface changes during the arrest of active enamel carious lesions in vivo. A scanning electron microscope study. , 1987, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[25]  D. J. White Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. I. Effects on early lesions: F uptake, surface hardening and remineralization. , 1987, Caries research.

[26]  J. Featherstone,et al.  Chemical and histological changes during development of artificial caries. , 1985, Caries research.

[27]  J. Featherstone,et al.  A scanning electron microscopic study of surface changes during development of artificial caries. , 1985, Caries research.

[28]  M Goldberg,et al.  Microchannels in the surface zone of artificially produced caries-like enamel lesions. , 1981, Journal de biologie buccale.

[29]  R. Groenhuis,et al.  Surface roughness of acid-etched and demineralized bovine enamel measured by a laser speckle method. , 1980, Caries research.

[30]  W H Bowen,et al.  Dental caries. , 1972, Archives of disease in childhood.

[31]  R M Frank,et al.  Ultrastructure of the approximal dental plaque and the underlying normal and carious enamel. , 1966, Archives of oral biology.