Competence, Performance, and the Locality of Quantifier Raising: Evidence from 4-Year-Old Children

We revisit the purported locality constraint on Quantifier Raising (QR) by investigating children's and adults' interpretation of antecedent-contained-deletion (ACD) sentences, where the interpretation depends on the landing site targeted by QR out of an embedded clause. When ACD is embedded in a nonfinite clause, 4-year-old children and adults access both the embedded and the matrix interpretations. When ACD is embedded in a finite clause, and the matrix interpretation is generally believed to be ungrammatical, children and even some adults access both readings. These findings allow for the possibility that the source of QR's reputed locality constraint may instead be extragrammatical, and they provide insight into the development of the human sentence parser.

[1]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: reply to Baltin , 1990 .

[2]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  QR in Child Grammar: Evidence from Antecedent-Contained Deletion , 2009 .

[3]  S. Crain.  Investigations In Universal Grammar , 1998 .

[4]  Jay F. Rosenberg,et al.  Readings in the philosophy of language , 1971 .

[5]  D. Fox.  Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[6]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Surface structure and interpretation , 1996, Linguistic inquiry.

[7]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[8]  David M. Perlmutter,et al.  Clause Reduction in Spanish , 1976 .

[9]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume III. , 1967 .

[10]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  When we do that and when we don’t: a contrastive analysis of VP ellipsis and VP anaphora , 2006 .

[11]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Stephanie W. Haas.  Construal , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[14]  Pauline Jacobson,et al.  Antecedent Contained Deletion in a Variable-Free Semantics , 1992 .

[15]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[16]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[17]  Jorge Hankamer,et al.  Deep and surface anaphora , 1993 .

[18]  T. Stowell,et al.  Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every , 1997 .

[19]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[20]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Equal Treatment for All Antecedents: How Children Succeed with Principle B , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[22]  P. Ludlow.  Readings in the philosophy of language , 1999 .

[23]  Mark Baltin,et al.  Do antecedent-contained deletions exist? , 1987 .

[24]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Learning the Structure of Causative Verbs: A Study in the Relationship of Cognitive, Semantic and Syntactic Development. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, No. 8. , 1974 .

[26]  M. R. Manzini.  Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[27]  Mara Frascarelli,et al.  PHASES OF INTERPRETATION , 2006 .

[28]  J. Merchant.  Economy, The Copy Theory, and Antecedent-Contained Deletion , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[29]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora , 1981 .

[30]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[31]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[32]  R. May.  The grammar of quantification , 1978 .

[33]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Antecedents‐contained Deletion in Negative Polarity Items , 2000 .

[35]  Anna Szabolcsi.  Ways of Scope Taking , 1997 .

[36]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[37]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  Binding Principles in the Grammars of Young Children , 1990 .

[38]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[39]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[40]  C. Clifton,et al.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[41]  Benjamin Bruening.  QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[42]  R. May.  Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation , 1985 .

[43]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide , 1996, Cognition.

[44]  Donka F. Farkas,et al.  Quantifier Scope and Syntactic Islands , 1981 .

[45]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  How Clause-bounded is the Scope of Universals? , 1996 .

[46]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  Explaining the locality conditions of QR: Consequences for the theory of phases , 2004 .

[47]  Christopher Kennedy.  Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification , 1997 .

[48]  Samuel Jay Keyser,et al.  Recent transformational studies in European languages , 1978 .

[49]  Danny Fox,et al.  Economy and Semantic Interpretation , 1999 .

[50]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  Studies in relational grammar , 1984 .

[51]  Norbert Horstein,et al.  An argument for minimalism: the case of antecedent-contained deletion , 1994 .

[52]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[53]  G. Frege.  Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[54]  M. Wagers.  The structure of memory meets memory for structure in linguistic cognition , 2008 .

[55]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[56]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research , 1993 .

[57]  Christopher Tancredi.  Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition , 1992 .

[58]  Rita M. Manzini,et al.  Parameters, binding theory and learnability , 1987 .

[59]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[60]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The Processing Cost of Reference Set Computation: Acquisition of Stress Shift and Focus , 2004 .

[61]  I. H. Fichte,et al.  Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik , 2022 .

[62]  Lawrence Michael Solan.  Anaphora in child language , 1978 .

[63]  P. Andersen,et al.  [Learning and memory]. , 1995, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[64]  Chien Yu-Chin,et al.  Children's Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics , 1990 .

[65]  Celia Jakubowicz,et al.  On Markedness and Binding Principles , 1984 .

[66]  J. Musolino,et al.  Children's command of quantification , 2002, Cognition.

[67]  Takuya Goro,et al.  Language -specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition , 2007 .

[68]  T. Reinhart,et al.  The innateness of binding and coreference , 1993 .

[69]  Tibor Kiss,et al.  Formal grammar : theory and implementation , 1994 .

[70]  Shoji Itakura,et al.  When do children exhibit a "yes" bias? , 2010, Child development.

[71]  Hirohisa Kiguchi,et al.  Binding principles and ACD constructions in child grammars , 2004 .