Competition and innovation behaviour

Abstract This paper attempts to shed light on the complex relationship between innovation and competition. Traditional measures of product market competition using industry statistics are often challenged and found wanting. Using the Statistics Canada 1999 Survey of Innovation, this paper develops new measures of competition by arguing that firms’ perceptions about their competitive environment are important for innovation and are better measures of firm-specific competition. It shows that the relationship can be positive or negative, depending on specific competition perception and specific innovation activity. In addition, it shows that firms tend to bundle process innovation with product innovation, implying that the economic value of process innovation is likely embodied in product innovation.

[1]  C. Belfield,et al.  The Behaviour of Graduates in the SME Labour Market: Evidence and Perceptions , 1999 .

[2]  J. Ordover,et al.  The 1982 Department of Justice Merger Guidelines: An Economic Assessment , 1983 .

[3]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[4]  Fred Gault.  Understanding Innovation in Canadian Industry , 2004 .

[5]  Peter Swann.  New technologies and the firm : innovation and competition , 1993 .

[6]  John T. Scott.  Purposive Diversification and Economic Performance , 1993 .

[7]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship , 2005 .

[8]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Complementarities in Innovation Policy , 2001 .

[9]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[10]  John T. Scott,et al.  SCALE ECONOMIES IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: THE SCHUMPETERIAN HYPOTHESIS , 1982 .

[11]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison , 1991 .

[12]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[13]  R. Winter‐Ebmer.  Firm Size, Earnings, and Displacement Risk , 2001 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[15]  Franklin M. Fisher,et al.  Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply? , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  John T. Scott,et al.  Market Structure and Technological Change , 1987 .

[17]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[18]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  J. Weinberg.  EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITION , 1992 .

[20]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Competition and Crporate Performance , 1993 .

[21]  P. Romer.  Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding Growth? , 1990 .

[22]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity , 1980 .

[23]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[24]  Jan Boone,et al.  Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation , 2000 .

[25]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses , 1985 .

[26]  N. Traoré,et al.  Determinants of biotechnology utilization by the Canadian industry , 2003 .

[27]  G. Grossman,et al.  Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[28]  John T. Scott.  Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity , 1984 .

[29]  Stephen Martin,et al.  Advanced Industrial Economics , 1994 .

[30]  Tom Lee,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation , 1980 .

[31]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives , 1986 .

[32]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[33]  S. Nickell.  Competition and Corporate Performance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.