Assessment of MR compatibility and machinability using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for material selection of MR device

Objective To develop magnetic resonance (MR) robot used in the magnetic field environment, materials selected for manufacturing robot should have good MR compatibility and machinability. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly urgent to develop an evaluation method considering the above two factors at the same time. Methods A series of experiments were done to study the interaction between the magnetic field of MR scanner and the material samples, and to determine the samples’ machinability. Four kinds of materials including metal and plastics with different geometric shape were used to test the artifacts, force and torque in magnetic resonance image (MRI) tube according to standard method. Three items including surface roughness, cutting force and chip shape were analyzed to evaluate the machinability of four samples. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was adopted to process these experimental data for choosing the most suitable robot material in MR environment. Results The quantized values of MR compatibility and machinability are achieved, and a new methodology for material selection are developed, which provides systematic guideline for engineer and researcher to choose suitable robot materials used in an MRI tube. Polyformaldehyde of four kinds of material is determined to be the most suitable one for MR robots or devices. Conclusion A thorough examination of four commonly used engineering materials has been discussed and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is suitable for choosing MR compatible robot materials. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 45B: 1–12, 2015

[1]  Freddy Odille,et al.  An RF-induced voltage sensor for investigating pacemaker safety in MRI , 2014, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[2]  E. Burdet,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in MR-Compatible Robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  Zion Tsz Ho Tse,et al.  The case for MR‐compatible robotics: a review of the state of the art , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[4]  Jian S. Dai Surgical robotics and its development and progress , 2010, Robotica.

[5]  B. Schueler,et al.  MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Nikolaos V. Tsekos,et al.  Design and Testing of a Robotic System for mr Image-guided Interventions , 2006, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[7]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[8]  Bert Jan Kooij,et al.  Assessing the MR compatibility of dental retainer wires at 7 Tesla , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Zion Tsz Ho Tse,et al.  Testing MR image artifacts generated by engineering materials , 2011 .

[10]  J. Schenck Safety of Strong, Static Magnetic Fields , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  M Lampérth,et al.  A Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compatible Manipulators in Surgery , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  R. Adapa,et al.  Safety and performance of TCI pumps in a magnetic resonance imaging environment * , 2012, Anaesthesia.

[13]  D Stoianovici,et al.  Multi‐imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[14]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  The evaluation of steerable ultrasonic catheters for minimally invasive MRI‐guided cardiac ablation , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Gregor Schaefers Magnetic Resonance (MR) Safety and Compatibility - Survey of Methods and Standards for Testing and Marking Medical Devices , 2009 .

[16]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  In vitro assessment of 3-T MRI issues for a bioabsorbable, coronary artery scaffold with metallic markers. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  MR Compatibility of Mechatronic Devices: Design Criteria , 1999, MICCAI.

[18]  Steffen Sammet,et al.  Assessing the safety and compatibility of silver based wound dressings in a magnetic resonance environment. , 2009, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[19]  Chembian Parthiban,et al.  Development of a Parallel Actuation Approach for MR-Compatible Robotics , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[20]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Control of an Magnetic Resonance Compatible Precision Pneumatic Active Cannula Robot , 2014 .

[21]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  MRI Induced Torque and Demagnetization in Retention Magnets for a Bone Conduction Implant , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.