From echolocation clicks to animal density--acoustic sampling of harbor porpoises with static dataloggers.

Monitoring abundance and population trends of small odontocetes is notoriously difficult and labor intensive. There is a need to develop alternative methods to the traditional visual line transect surveys, especially for low density areas. Here, the prospect of obtaining robust density estimates for porpoises by passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is demonstrated by combining rigorous application of methods adapted from distance sampling to PAM. Acoustic dataloggers (T-PODs) were deployed in an area where harbor porpoises concurrently were tracked visually. Probability of detection was estimated in a mark-recapture approach, where a visual sighting constituted a "mark" and a simultaneous acoustic detection a "recapture." As a distance could be assigned to each visual observation, a detection function was estimated. Effective detection radius of T-PODs ranged from 22 to 104 m depending on T-POD type, T-POD sensitivity, train classification settings, and snapshot duration. The T-POD density estimates corresponded to the visual densities derived concurrently for the same period. With more dataloggers, located according to a systematic design, density estimates would be obtainable for a larger area. This provides a method suitable for monitoring in areas with densities too low for visual surveys to be practically feasible, e.g., the endangered harbor porpoise population in the Baltic.

[1]  S. Buckland Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[2]  Len Thomas,et al.  Estimating cetacean population density using fixed passive acoustic sensors: an example with Blainville's beaked whales. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  POINT-TRANSECT SURVEYS FOR SONGBIRDS: ROBUST METHODOLOGIES , 2006 .

[4]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) static acoustic monitoring: laboratory detection thresholds of T-PODs are reflected in field sensitivity , 2008, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[5]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters , 2002 .

[6]  Y. Naito,et al.  Comparison of echolocation behaviour between coastal and riverine porpoises , 2007 .

[7]  B. Møhl,et al.  Echolocation: high-frequency component in the click of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena ph. L.). , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Roger Mundry,et al.  Geographical and seasonal variation of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) presence in the German Baltic Sea revealed by passive acoustic monitoring , 2007, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[9]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena (L.)). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Impacts of offshore wind farm construction on harbour porpoises: acoustic monitoring of echolocation activity using porpoise detectors (T-PODs) , 2006 .

[11]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) and wind farms: a case study in the Dutch North Sea , 2011 .

[12]  J. Tougaard,et al.  Echolocation signals of wild harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.