Chemistry as a function of the fine-structure constant and the electron-proton mass ratio

In standard computations in theoretical quantum chemistry the accepted values of the fundamental physical constants are assumed. Alternatively, the tools of computational quantum chemistry can be used to investigate hypothetical chemistry that would result from different values of these constants, given the same physical laws. In this work, the dependence of a variety of basic chemical quantities on the values of the fine-structure constant and the electron-proton mass ratio is explored. In chemistry, the accepted values of both constants may be considered small, in the sense that their increase must be substantial to seriously impact bond energies. It is found that if the fine-structure constant were larger, covalent bonds between light atoms would be weaker, and the dipole moment and hydrogen-bonding ability of water would be reduced. Conversely, an increase in the value of the electron-proton mass ratio increases dissociation energies in molecules such as H{sub 2}, O{sub 2}, and CO{sub 2}. Specifically, a sevenfold increase in the fine-structure constant decreases the strength of the O-H bond in the water molecule by 7 kcal mol{sup -1} while reducing its dipole moment by at least 10%, whereas a 100-fold increase in the electron-proton mass ratio increases the same bond energy bymore » 11 kcal mol{sup -1}.« less

[1]  Matthew L. Leininger,et al.  PSI3: An open‐source Ab Initio electronic structure package , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Trond Saue,et al.  An infinite-order two-component relativistic Hamiltonian by a simple one-step transformation. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  T. Crawford,et al.  An Introduction to Coupled Cluster Theory for Computational Chemists , 2007 .

[4]  John F. Stanton,et al.  Applications of Post‐Hartree—Fock Methods: A Tutorial , 2007 .

[5]  B. Roos,et al.  Theoretical study of PbO and the PbO anion , 2005 .

[6]  Juana Vázquez,et al.  HEAT: High accuracy extrapolated ab initio thermochemistry. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Markus Reiher,et al.  Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. II. The generalized Douglas-Kroll-Hess transformation up to arbitrary order. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  Markus Reiher,et al.  Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. I. General theory. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  Lucas Visscher,et al.  Parallelization of four‐component calculations. II. Symmetry‐driven parallelization of the 4‐Spinor CCSD algorithm , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  Edward F. Valeev,et al.  The diagonal Born–Oppenheimer correction beyond the Hartree–Fock approximation , 2003 .

[11]  J. Tennyson,et al.  Estimation of Lamb-shift effects for molecules: Application to the rotation-vibration spectra of water , 2001 .

[12]  H. Schlattl,et al.  Stellar production rates of carbon and its abundance in the universe. , 2000, Science.

[13]  P. Mohr,et al.  Calculation of the Electron Self-Energy for Low Nuclear Charge , 2000, physics/0001068.

[14]  P. Mohr,et al.  Influence of nuclear size on QED corrections in hydrogenlike heavy ions , 1998 .

[15]  K. Dyall,et al.  Formulation and implementation of a relativistic unrestricted coupled-cluster method including noniterative connected triples , 1996 .

[16]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Relativistic effects at the correlated level. An application to interhalogens , 1993 .

[17]  Mohr,et al.  Self-energy correction to one-electron energy levels in a strong Coulomb field. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[18]  Indelicato,et al.  Coordinate-space approach to the bound-electron self-energy. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[19]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[20]  Kim,et al.  Self-energy of excited states in a strong Coulomb field. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[21]  B. A. Hess,et al.  The two-electron terms of the no-pair Hamiltonian , 1992 .

[22]  J. Truran,et al.  The anthropic significance of the existence of an excited state of 12C , 1989, Nature.

[23]  Bernd A. Hess,et al.  Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[24]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[25]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[26]  H. Schaefer,et al.  The diagonal correction to the Born–Oppenheimer approximation: Its effect on the singlet–triplet splitting of CH2 and other molecular effects , 1986 .

[27]  Hess,et al.  Applicability of the no-pair equation with free-particle projection operators to atomic and molecular structure calculations. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[28]  M. Rees,et al.  The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world , 1979, Nature.

[29]  R. Dicke Dirac's Cosmology and Mach's Principle , 1961, Nature.

[30]  F. Hoyle,et al.  On Nuclear Reactions Occuring in Very Hot STARS.I. the Synthesis of Elements from Carbon to Nickel. , 1954 .

[31]  W. D. Allen,et al.  Fragmentation surface of triplet ketene , 1998 .