Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.

[1]  K A Eagle,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coro , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  T. Takayama,et al.  Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: Validation by direct coronary pressure measurements , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  N Doba,et al.  Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Moderate Coronary Artery Stenoses: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve , 2000, Circulation.

[5]  M. Leon,et al.  Importance of lesion length on new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations : A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery). , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  K Suzuki,et al.  Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. , 1999, Circulation.

[8]  P J Scanlon,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  J. Murray,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Kern,et al.  From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[12]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[14]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  M. Kern,et al.  Hemodynamic significance of coronary jet velocity in patients: limitations of the Bernouilli equation in small conduits. , 1995, American heart journal.

[18]  M. Kern,et al.  Comparison of quantitative angiographically derived and measured translesion pressure and flow velocity in coronary artery disease. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  A Bol,et al.  Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Circulation.

[20]  F. Klocke.  Cognition in the era of technology: "seeing the shades of gray". , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  B. Kimball,et al.  Comparative evaluation of coronary stenoses using fluid dynamic equations and standard quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  N. Mullani,et al.  Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[24]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.

[26]  K. Gould,et al.  Physiological Significance of Coronary Flow Velocity and Changing Stenosis Geometry during Coronary Vasodilation in Awake Dogs , 1982, Circulation research.

[27]  C. Zarins,et al.  Subcritical arterial stenosis enhances distal atherosclerosis , 1981 .

[28]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.