Wall irregularity rather than intima-media thickness is associated with nearby atherosclerosis.

In addition to intima-media thickness (IMT), IMT inhomogeneity may carry information about atherosclerosis progression. In 147 vascular diseased patients (mean 66 y, 48% male), we determined the carotid bulb stenosis degree based on local Doppler blood flow velocities. Common carotid artery (CCA) morphologic characteristics, i.e. IMT, IMT-inhomogeneity (intraregistration variation) and IMT uni- and bilateral intrasubject variation (DeltaIMT), were measured using multiple M-mode. Associations of morphologic characteristics, stenosis degree and Framingham score were evaluated with Pearson correlation (r) and multiple regression analysis. The IMT distributions for subjects without and with stenosis were not similar. The stenosis degree score correlated significantly to unilateral (r=0.68) and bilateral DeltaIMT (r=0.62), IMT (r=0.41) and IMT-inhomogeneity (r=0.45). The averaged IMT and IMT-inhomogeneity increased slightly for singular stenosis and abruptly for multiple stenoses. Mean uni- and bilateral DeltaIMT per stenosis degree increased linearly with this degree, reaching a correlation close to 1 (r=0.98 and r=0.97). Interestingly, the majority of the subjects with a moderate to severe bulb stenosis exhibited a carotid IMT lower than the considered critical threshold of 0.9 mm. In conclusion, although CCA is not prone to plaques, its morphologic characteristics are positively correlated with stenosis degree score and other risk scores. DeltaIMT can be more reliable derived from inter-registration rather than from intra-registration variation. In the CCA, DeltaIMT substantiates vascular alteration better than IMT.

[1]  AlexisElbaz,et al.  Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Brain Infarction , 2000 .

[2]  P Ducimetière,et al.  Cross-sectional and 4-year longitudinal associations between brachial pulse pressure and common carotid intima-media thickness in a general population. The EVA study. , 1999, Stroke.

[3]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Stroke risk profile: adjustment for antihypertensive medication. The Framingham Study. , 1994, Stroke.

[4]  P J Brands,et al.  Assessment of the spatial homogeneity of artery dimension parameters with high frame rate 2-D B-mode. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  L. Saba,et al.  CT and Ultrasound in the Study of Ulcerated Carotid Plaque Compared with Surgical Results: Potentialities and Advantages of Multidetector Row CT Angiography , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  G. Boers,et al.  Carotid and femoral artery wall thickness and stiffness in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease, with special emphasis on hyperhomocysteinemia. , 1998, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[7]  P. Moulin,et al.  Incremental predictive value of carotid ultrasonography in the assessment of coronary risk in a cohort of asymptomatic type 2 diabetic subjects. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[8]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[9]  R. Reneman,et al.  Noninvasive vascular ultrasound: an asset in vascular medicine. , 2000, Cardiovascular research.

[10]  R. Reneman,et al.  Assessment of Local Differences in Intima-Media Thickness in the Human Common Carotid Artery , 1999, Journal of Vascular Research.

[11]  Spatial inhomogeneity of common carotid artery intima-media is increased in dialysis patients. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[12]  Albert Hofman,et al.  Increased common carotid intima-media thickness. Adaptive response or a reflection of atherosclerosis? Findings from the Rotterdam Study. , 1997, Stroke.

[13]  Eric Vicaut,et al.  Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Plaques, and Framingham Risk Score as Independent Determinants of Stroke Risk , 2005, Stroke.

[14]  Eary,et al.  CAROTID-ARTERY INTIMA AND MEDIA THICKNESS AS A RISK FACTOR FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND STROKE IN OLDER ADULTS , 2000 .

[15]  J. Milbrandt,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria to a Single Institution Clinical Practice , 2008, Ultrasound quarterly.

[16]  M. Hori,et al.  Equivalence of plaque score and intima-media thickness of carotid ultrasonography for predicting severe coronary artery lesion. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Carotid Artery Stenosis: Grayscale and Doppler Ultrasound Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference , 2003, Ultrasound quarterly.

[18]  Pierre Amarenco,et al.  Common Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Brain Infarction The Étude du Profil Génétique de l’Infarctus Cérébral (GÉNIC) Case-Control Study , 2000 .

[19]  J. Staessen,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  R W Barnes,et al.  Reproducibility of Noninvasive Ultrasonic Measurement of Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Plaque Study , 1992, Stroke.

[21]  Alessandro C. Rossi,et al.  Automatic recognition of the common carotid artery in longitudinal ultrasound B-mode scans , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  R. Armentano,et al.  Carotid wall viscosity increase is related to intima-media thickening in hypertensive patients. , 1998, Hypertension.

[23]  Gerardo Heiss,et al.  Carotid Artery Intimal‐Medial Thickness Distribution in General Populations As Evaluated by B‐Mode Ultrasound , 1993, Stroke.