Reversed effects of grazing on plant diversity: the role of below- ground competition and size symmetry

Grazing is known as one of the key factors for diversity and community composition in grassland ecosystems, but the response of plant communities towards grazing varies remarkably between sites with different environmental conditions. It is generally accepted that grazing increases plant diversity in productive environments, while it tends to reduce diversity in unproductive habitats (grazing reversal hypothesis). Despite empirical evidence for this pattern the mechanistic link between modes of plant—plant competition and grazing response at the community level still remains poorly understood. Root-competition in particular has rarely been included in theoretical studies, although it has been hypothesized that variations in productivity and grazing regime can alter the relative importance of shoot- and root-competition. We therefore developed an individual-based model based on plant functional traits to investigate the response of a grassland community towards grazing. Models of different complexity, either incorporating only shoot competition or with distinct shoot- and root-competition, were used to study the interactive effects of grazing, resource availability, and the mode of competition (size-symmetric or asymmetric). The pattern predicted by the grazing reversal hypothesis (GRH) can only be explained by our model if shoot- and root-competition are explicitly considered and if size asymmetry of above- and symmetry of below-ground competition is assumed. For this scenario, the model additionally reproduced empirically observed plant trait responses: erect and large plant functional types (PFTs) dominated without grazing, while frequent grazing favoured small PFTs with a rosette growth form. We conclude that interactions between shoot- and root-competition and size symmetry/asymmetry of plant-plant interactions are crucial in order to understand grazing response under different habitat productivities. Our results suggest that future empirical trait surveys in grassland communities should include root traits, which have been largely ignored in previous studies, in order to improve predictions of plants' responses to grazing.

[1]  I. R. Johnson A Model of the Partitioning of Growth between the Shoots and Roots of Vegetative Plants , 1985 .

[2]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The stability of grazing systems revisited: spatial models and the role of heterogeneity , 1999 .

[3]  M. Kondoh Unifying the relationships of species richness to productivity and disturbance , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[5]  R. Hunt,et al.  A self‐assembling model of resource dynamics and plant growth incorporating plant functional types , 2001 .

[6]  A. Mazumder,et al.  REVERSAL OF GRAZING IMPACT ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN NUTRIENT‐POOR VS. NUTRIENT‐RICH ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[7]  H. Muller‐Landau,et al.  The Effects of Density, Spatial Pattern, and Competitive Symmetry on Size Variation in Simulated Plant Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Uta Berger,et al.  TOWARDS A STANDARD FOR THE INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODELING OF PLANT POPULATIONS: SELF‐THINNING AND THE FIELD‐OF‐NEIGHBORHOOD APPROACH , 2002 .

[9]  J. Weiner Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants , 2004 .

[10]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Estimating the fruit dispersion of anemochorous forest trees , 2001 .

[11]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size symmetry of competition alters biomass–density relationships , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  M. Rees,et al.  Coexistence and Relative Abundance in Annual Plant Assemblages: The Roles of Competition and Colonization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[13]  O. Sala,et al.  A Generalized Model of the Effects of Grazing by Large Herbivores on Grassland Community Structure , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Tara G. Martin,et al.  The relative importance of cattle grazing in subtropical grasslands: does it reduce or enhance plant biodiversity? , 2003 .

[15]  Daniel G. Milchunas,et al.  Plant trait responses to grazing – a global synthesis , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Grasslands, grazing and biodiversity: editors’ introduction , 2001 .

[17]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[18]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  The Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off Is Dead; Long Live the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐off , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Stephen H. Roxburgh,et al.  THE INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS: PATCH DYNAMICS AND MECHANISMS OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE , 2004 .

[20]  G. Berntson,et al.  CHARACTERIZING THE SIZE DEPENDENCE OF RESOURCE ACQUISITION WITHIN CROWDED PLANT POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[21]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[22]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[23]  H. Olff,et al.  Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  J. Cahill Fertilization effects on interactions between above-and belowground competition in an old field , 1999 .

[25]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[26]  O. Eriksson,et al.  A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants , 2000 .

[27]  V. Grimm,et al.  Competition among plants: Concepts, individual-based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy , 2008 .

[28]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[29]  M. Kleyer,et al.  Turnover of plant trait hierarchies in simulated community assembly in response to fertility and disturbance , 2007 .

[30]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[31]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species , 1998 .

[32]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Modelling the effects of landscape pattern and grazing regimes on the persistence of plant species with high conservation value in grasslands in south-eastern Sweden , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  S. Díaz,et al.  GRAZING EFFECTS ON RANGELAND DIVERSITY: A SYNTHESIS OF CONTEMPORARY MODELS , 2005 .

[34]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[35]  M. Leishman Does the seed size/number trade‐off model determine plant community structure? An assessment of the model mechanisms and their generality , 2001 .

[36]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[37]  R. Hunt,et al.  Herbaceous plant strategies in disturbed habitats , 2001 .

[38]  Monika Schwager,et al.  The state of plant population modelling in light of environmental change , 2008 .

[39]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Simple traits do not predict grazing response in Australian dry shrublands and woodlands , 2004 .

[40]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Environmental variability and allocation trade-offs maintain species diversity in a process-based model of succulent plant communities , 2006 .

[41]  M. Huston A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[42]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[43]  P. Amarasekare Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis , 2003 .

[44]  M Bullock James,et al.  A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment , 2001 .

[45]  S. Díaz,et al.  Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits , 2001 .

[46]  D. Tilman,et al.  Component of Plant Competition Along an Experimental Gradient of Nitrogen Availability , 1991 .

[47]  P. Schippers,et al.  Modelling seed dispersal by wind in herbaceous species , 1999 .