The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients.

BACKGROUND The first generation of pericardial valves has been withdrawn from the market because of excessively high rates of premature failure. With its original design, the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve has promised improved results. METHODS In our institution, 589 patients underwent an isolated aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis between July 1984 and December 1993. The patients' mean age was 67.5 +/- 11.2 years, and 49% of the patients were in New York Heart Association clinical class III or IV. The operative mortality rate was 2.3% (14 of 595). All patients but 4 were followed up for an average of 4.1 years after their operation, and total follow-up was 2,408 patient-years. RESULTS At the time of the study, more than 85% of the patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. There were 79 late deaths. After 10 years, the actuarial survival rate was 71% +/- 7%. Nineteen patients died of valve-related causes (3 endocarditis, 7 thromboembolic complications, 1 structural failure, and 8 sudden deaths). The actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related death was 94% +/- 3% at 10 years. Valve-related complications included 23 thromboembolic episodes (0.9% per patient-year), 14 endocarditis (0.5% per patient-year), 9 reoperations (0.4% per patient-year), and 4 structural valve failures with calcification and stenosis (0.2% per patient-year). After 10 years, freedom from valve-related complications was 84% +/- 6%, from reoperation 97% +/- 2%, and from valve failure 96% +/- 4%. CONCLUSIONS Because of its low rate of valve-related events at 10 years and low rate of structural deterioration with no leaflet tears, this prosthesis is an outstanding choice for patients who need tissue valves and for patients aged 60 years or older.

[1]  E. Butchart,et al.  Arterial risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular events after aortic valve replacement. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[2]  F. Nistal,et al.  Incidence of primary tissue valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. Preliminary results. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  S. Nitter‐Hauge,et al.  Ten-year experience with the Medtronic Hall valvular prosthesis. A study of 1,104 patients. , 1989, Circulation.

[4]  P. Tchou,et al.  Electrophysiologic spectrum of concealed intranodal conduction during atrial rate acceleration in a model of 2:1 atrioventricular block. , 1989, Circulation.

[5]  D. Roberts,et al.  The influence of age on the durability of Carpentier-Edwards biological valves. Thirteen years follow-up. , 1991, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  J. Matloff,et al.  Ten-year experience with the St. Jude Medical valve for primary valve replacement. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  H. Scully,et al.  Five‐Year Follow‐up of Hancock Pericardial Valves: Management of Premature Failure , 1988, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  Anderson Rh,et al.  Obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract: anatomical observations and surgical implications. , 1993 .

[9]  F. Crawford,et al.  The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  L. Cohn,et al.  Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  R. Subramanyan,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with the antibiotic-sterilized aortic homograft valve inserted freehand in the aortic position. , 1987, Circulation.

[12]  G. Gerosa,et al.  Replacement of the aortic valve or root with a pulmonary autograft in children. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  D J Wheatley,et al.  Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Loisance,et al.  Mode of failure of the Mitroflow pericardial valve. , 1992, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[15]  R A Christopher,et al.  Dynamic behavior of prosthetic aortic tissue valves as viewed by high-speed cinematography. , 1979, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Long‐Term Evaluation of the Carpentier‐Edwards Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position , 1991, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[18]  P E Oyer,et al.  Durability of porcine valves at fifteen years in a representative North American patient population. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  V. Walley,et al.  Patterns of failure in Hancock pericardial bioprostheses. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  W G Henderson,et al.  A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  The Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve: results in 473 patients. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  B. Meyns,et al.  Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. , 1994, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[23]  T. David,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with a stentless porcine aortic valve. A six-year experience. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  D C Naftel,et al.  Long-term function of cryopreserved aortic homografts. A ten-year study. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  A. Mazzucco,et al.  Failure of Hancock pericardial xenografts: is prophylactic bioprosthetic replacement justified? , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  B. Lytle,et al.  Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo. , 1985, Circulation.

[27]  M. Carrier,et al.  Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients. , 1989, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  F. Loop,et al.  In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[29]  B. Barratt-Boyes,et al.  The zero pressure fixed medtronic intact porcine valve: an 8.5 year review. , 1993, The Journal of heart valve disease.