The Development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Item Selection, Factor Structure, Reliability and Concurrent Validity

Background: Assessments of personality constructs increasingly use self-report and structured interview instruments, which allow for a multimethod measurement approach and decrease specific measurement method bias. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable structured interview for assessing the alexithymia construct. Methods: Sixty interview questions were written initially, each with a set of scoring criteria and prompts and probes to elicit information assisting in the scoring of the respondents’ answers. Results: After pilot testing, the number of questions was reduced to 43, which were administered to 136 community participants and 97 psychiatric outpatients. A series of item and scale analyses further reduced the item pool to 24 items. Principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of these 24 items revealed preliminary evidence of a hierarchical, four-factor structure, with four lower factors nested within two higher-order latent factors. This structural configuration resulted in the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia (TSIA) with two domain scales and four facet scales. The TSIA and its six scales demonstrated acceptable levels of interrater, internal, and retest reliability. The TSIA and its scales correlated modestly but significantly with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and its three factor scales, providing some support for the concurrent validity of this interview. Conclusion: The TSIA appears to be a promising structured interview for assessing alexithymia.

[1]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Convergent and discriminative validity of interview and questionnaire measures of personality disorder in mentally disordered offenders: a multitrait-multimethod analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. , 2004, Journal of personality disorders.

[2]  R. Bagby,et al.  New Trends in Alexithymia Research , 2004, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[3]  Markus Bühner,et al.  Is there a reliable factorial structure in the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale? A comparison of factor models in clinical and normal adult samples. , 2003, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[4]  L. Finos,et al.  Psychological Assessment in Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2003, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[5]  R. Bagby,et al.  The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures , 2003 .

[6]  R. Bagby,et al.  The 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. , 2003, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[7]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[8]  P. Spinhoven,et al.  The assessment of alexithymia: a critical review of the literature and a psychometric study of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20. , 2002, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[9]  L. Lundh,et al.  Alexithymia, memory of emotion, emotional awareness, and perfectionism. , 2002, Emotion.

[10]  G. Meyer,et al.  Construct validity of rorschach variables for alexithymia. , 2002, Psychosomatics.

[11]  Murakami Shuji,et al.  Development of the Structured Interview by the Modified Edition of Beth Israel Hospital Psychosomatic Questionnaire (SIBIQ) in Japanese Edition to Evaluate Alexithymia , 2002 .

[12]  M. G. Haviland,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale in a Clinical Sample , 2001, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  P. Porcelli,et al.  Criterion-Related Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research for Alexithymia in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders , 2001, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[14]  B. Bermond,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Bermond–Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire , 2001 .

[15]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[16]  G. Taylor.  Recent Developments in Alexithymia Theory and Research , 2000, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[17]  T. Trull,et al.  A structured interview for the assessment of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. , 1998 .

[18]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[19]  Richard D Lane,et al.  Is Alexithymia the Emotional Equivalent of Blindsight? , 1997, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  T. Erni,et al.  Two-factor solution of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale confirmed. , 1997, Psychopathology.

[21]  I. Deary,et al.  Neuroticism, alexithymia and medically unexplained symptoms , 1997 .

[22]  P. Sifneos.  Alexithymia: past and present. , 1996, The American journal of psychiatry.

[23]  George R. Franke,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows , 1995 .

[24]  J. Francis.  Statistica for Windows , 1995 .

[25]  M. Zimmerman.  Diagnosing personality disorders. A review of issues and research methods. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[27]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Factorial validity of the 20‐item Toronto Alexithymia Scale , 1993 .

[28]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[29]  J C Perry,et al.  Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. , 1992, The American journal of psychiatry.

[30]  R. Bagby,et al.  Measurement of alexithymia. Recommendations for clinical practice and future research. , 1988, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[31]  S. Briggs,et al.  The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales , 1986 .

[32]  P E Shrout,et al.  The effects of measurement errors on some multivariate procedures. , 1977, American journal of public health.

[33]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[34]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[35]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[36]  R. Bagby,et al.  Assessment of alexithymia : self-report and observer-rated measures , 2000 .

[37]  R. Bagby,et al.  An overview of the alexithymia construct. , 2000 .

[38]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[39]  B. Einspruch.  Disorders of Affect Regulation: Alexithymia in Medical and Psychiatric Illness , 1998 .

[40]  P. Bech,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research. , 1995, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[41]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[42]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[43]  R. Bagby,et al.  The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[44]  G J Taylor,et al.  The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[45]  D. Donabédian.  La pensée opératoire , 1993 .

[46]  G J Taylor,et al.  Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. , 1985, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.