Distributing HRM responsibilities: a classification of organisations

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to show that HRM is not the sole responsibility of HR departments, but also of other agents inside and outside the organisation, such as top and line managers, and external HRM service providers. This paper seeks to examine how organisations distribute HRM activities and responsibilities among these agents. The study attempts to classify organisations according to agent distribution and to explore whether a number of internal and external context characteristics affect this distribution. Design/methodology/approach – The survey in the paper shows the methodology chosen in order to collect and analyse factual data about the participation of different agents in HRM activities and the characteristics of the organisations and their context. The questionnaire obtained a valid sample of 231 Spanish companies. A multiple correspondence analysis approach was taken in order to cluster the organisations. Findings – The analysis of the data in this paper clearly produced seven groups, each involving organisations that allocated responsibilities to the various agents in a similar fashion. However, no common contextual characteristics were found among the companies in each of the seven categories. Research limitations/implications – The main limitations in the paper are related to the length of the questionnaire, the adequacy of the respondents related to the unit of observation; and the relative newness of the techniques used. Originality/value – The main contribution of the paper consists of the incorporation of existing partial areas of study in the field of HRM (roles of the HR department, devolution to line management, and outsourcing of the HR function) into an integrated study.

[1]  N. Burns,et al.  Organizational Configurations: Implications for the Human Resource/ Personnel Management Debate , 1993 .

[2]  K. Sisson.  Introducing The Human Resource Management Journal , 1990 .

[3]  Michael Poole,et al.  Editorial: Human resource management in an international perspective , 1990 .

[4]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Linking individual performance to business strategy: The people process model , 1999 .

[5]  I. Kessler,et al.  New forms of employment relations in the public services: the limits of strategic choice , 2000 .

[6]  S. Jackson,et al.  Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Alan Fell,et al.  Evaluating the Personnel Function , 1986 .

[8]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[9]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Strategic Human Resource Management , 2014 .

[10]  C. Brewster,et al.  A comparative analysis of the link between flexibility and HRM strategy , 1996 .

[11]  John Storey,et al.  The Realities Of Human Resource Management: Managing The Employment Relationship , 2000 .

[12]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[13]  M. Tayeb.  Contingency Theory and Culture: A Study of Matched English and the Indian Manufacturing Firms , 1987 .

[14]  David Ulrich,et al.  Tomorrow's HR management : 48 thought leaders call for change , 1997 .

[15]  Ian Cunningham,et al.  Devolving human resource responsibilities to the line , 1999 .

[16]  T. Jackson.  Managing change in South Africa: developing people and organizations , 1999 .

[17]  P. Gunnigle,et al.  Linking Business Strategy and Human Resource Management: Issues and Implications , 1994 .

[18]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Managing Human Resources: A Partnership Perspective , 1999 .

[19]  L. Gratton,et al.  Paying the piper: choice and constraint in changing HR functional roles , 2002 .

[20]  L. Dyer,et al.  A Role-Based Taxonomy of Human Resource Organizations , 1992 .

[21]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[22]  M. Poole,et al.  Responsibilities for human resource management practices in the modern enterprise , 1997 .

[23]  P. Gunnigle.  Personnel Policy Choice: The Context for Human Resource Development , 1991 .

[24]  L. Donaldson.  The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[25]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[26]  Derek Torrington,et al.  Letting go or holding on ‐ the devolution of operational personnel activities , 1998 .

[27]  John Storey.  Developments in the Management of Human Resources , 1988 .

[28]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Comparative research in human resource management: a review and an example , 1996 .

[29]  Stefano Marzano,et al.  Vision of the future , 1988 .

[30]  Derek Torrington,et al.  The Human Resource Function: The Dynamics of Change and Development , 1998 .

[31]  Pawan S. Budhwar,et al.  Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management in the UK , 2000 .

[32]  C. Brewster,et al.  Researching Human Resource Management: Methodology of the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Project on European Trends , 1991 .

[33]  Tom Redman,et al.  The Use of HRM Consultants: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in the North‐East of England , 1993 .

[34]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[35]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[36]  Paul Sparrow,et al.  Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management in India , 1997 .

[37]  H. Trice,et al.  An occupation in conflict : a study of the personnel manager , 1970 .

[38]  K. Legge.  Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[39]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[40]  Malcolm Williams.  New strategies in social research , 2006 .