Metabolite-mediated modelling of microbial community dynamics captures emergent behaviour more effectively than species–species modelling

Personalized models of the gut microbiome are valuable for disease prevention and treatment. For this, one requires a mathematical model that predicts microbial community composition and the emergent behaviour of microbial communities. We seek a modelling strategy that can capture emergent behaviour when built from sets of universal individual interactions. Our investigation reveals that species–metabolite interaction (SMI) modelling is better able to capture emergent behaviour in community composition dynamics than direct species–species modelling. Using publicly available data, we examine the ability of species–species models and species–metabolite models to predict trio growth experiments from the outcomes of pair growth experiments. We compare quadratic species–species interaction models and quadratic SMI models and conclude that only species–metabolite models have the necessary complexity to explain a wide variety of interdependent growth outcomes. We also show that general species–species interaction models cannot match the patterns observed in community growth dynamics, whereas species–metabolite models can. We conclude that species–metabolite modelling will be important in the development of accurate, clinically useful models of microbial communities.

[1]  Michael B. Mundy,et al.  Distinct microbes, metabolites, and ecologies define the microbiome in deficient and proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancers , 2018, bioRxiv.

[2]  H. Wang,et al.  Microbiome Dynamics in a Shrimp Grow-out Pond with Possible Outbreak of Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Rick L. Stevens,et al.  High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[5]  Ted J. Case,et al.  Higher Order Interactions in Ecological Communities: What Are They and How Can They be Detected? , 1994 .

[6]  Thibaud Taillefumier,et al.  Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[7]  Francesco Mancuso,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Co-Occurrence Networks with NetCutter , 2008, PloS one.

[8]  J. McCall,et al.  Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation , 2005 .

[9]  Carsten Wiuf,et al.  Lyapunov Functions, Stationary Distributions, and Non-equilibrium Potential for Reaction Networks , 2015, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[10]  A. Mougi,et al.  Diversity of Interaction Types and Ecological Community Stability , 2012, Science.

[11]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Ecological Modeling from Time-Series Inference: Insight into Dynamics and Stability of Intestinal Microbiota , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Diversity, Stability, and Reproducibility in Stochastically Assembled Microbial Ecosystems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[13]  A. Mariani,et al.  The Role of Microbiota in Human Reproductive Tract Cancers , 2019 .

[14]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Nutrient levels and trade-offs control diversity in a model seasonal ecosystem. , 2019, 1902.09039.

[15]  Anders B. Dohlman,et al.  Mapping the microbial interactome: Statistical and experimental approaches for microbiome network inference , 2019, Experimental biology and medicine.

[16]  Li Xie,et al.  Lotka-Volterra pairwise modeling fails to capture diverse pairwise microbial interactions , 2017, eLife.

[17]  M. T. Angulo,et al.  A theoretical framework for controlling complex microbial communities , 2019, Nature Communications.

[18]  N. Schork,et al.  The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? , 2011, Personalized medicine.

[19]  J. Raes,et al.  Microbial interactions: from networks to models , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[20]  David F. Anderson,et al.  Continuous Time Markov Chain Models for Chemical Reaction Networks , 2011 .

[21]  T. Kurtz The Relationship between Stochastic and Deterministic Models for Chemical Reactions , 1972 .

[22]  Krishna R. Kalari,et al.  Multiple sclerosis patients have a distinct gut microbiota compared to healthy controls , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[23]  B. Weimer,et al.  Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens , 2013, Nature.

[24]  R. Arditi,et al.  Microbial Interactions within a Cheese Microbial Community , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  Rafael Bargiela,et al.  Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach , 2012, Gut.

[26]  Si Tang,et al.  Stability criteria for complex ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[27]  A. Waite,et al.  Microscopy quantification of microbial birth and death dynamics , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  Daryi Wang,et al.  Inferring microbial interactions in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of hog waste , 2017, PloS one.

[29]  G H Guyatt,et al.  The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[30]  G. Gauze The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .

[31]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[32]  Casey M. Theriot,et al.  Metabolic Model-Based Integration of Microbiome Taxonomic and Metabolomic Profiles Elucidates Mechanistic Links between Ecological and Metabolic Variation , 2016, mSystems.

[33]  O. Reséndis-Antonio,et al.  MICOM: Metagenome-Scale Modeling To Infer Metabolic Interactions in the Gut Microbiota , 2018, mSystems.

[34]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Evidence for a multi-level trophic organization of the human gut microbiome , 2019, bioRxiv.

[35]  Jeff Gore,et al.  Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms , 2016, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[36]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[37]  Gheorghe Craciun,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Chemical Reaction Systems , 2018, 1805.10371.

[38]  Thomas G. Kurtz,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Biochemical Systems , 2015 .

[39]  Wenying Shou,et al.  High-throughput quantification of microbial birth and death dynamics using fluorescence microscopy , 2019, Quantitative Biology.

[40]  B. White,et al.  Individualized medicine and the microbiome in reproductive tract , 2015, Front. Physiol..

[41]  Ali R. Zomorrodi,et al.  d-OptCom: Dynamic multi-level and multi-objective metabolic modeling of microbial communities. , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[42]  G. Tonon,et al.  Microbiota-driven interleukin-17-producing cells and eosinophils synergize to accelerate multiple myeloma progression , 2018, Nature Communications.

[43]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Multiple stable states in microbial communities explained by the stable marriage problem , 2017, The ISME Journal.

[44]  Daryi Wang,et al.  MetaMIS: a metagenomic microbial interaction simulator based on microbial community profiles , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.

[45]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  SteadyCom: Predicting microbial abundances while ensuring community stability , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Pan-Jun Kim,et al.  Global metabolic interaction network of the human gut microbiota for context-specific community-scale analysis , 2017, Nature Communications.

[47]  Charles K. Fisher,et al.  Identifying Keystone Species in the Human Gut Microbiome from Metagenomic Timeseries Using Sparse Linear Regression , 2014, PloS one.

[48]  Nuno Bandeira,et al.  Mass spectral molecular networking of living microbial colonies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  S. Mazmanian,et al.  The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[50]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Mathematical models in biology , 2005, Classics in applied mathematics.

[51]  Nicholas Chia,et al.  MMinte: an application for predicting metabolic interactions among the microbial species in a community , 2016, BMC Bioinformatics.

[52]  A. Latorre,et al.  Oxidative stress in the oral cavity is driven by individual-specific bacterial communities , 2018, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes.

[53]  O. Reséndis-Antonio,et al.  MICOM: metagenome-scale modeling to infer metabolic interactions in the gut microbiota , 2018, bioRxiv.

[54]  Karoline Faust,et al.  From hairballs to hypotheses–biological insights from microbial networks , 2018, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[55]  Kevin Y. Chen,et al.  Microbial coexistence through chemical-mediated interactions , 2018, bioRxiv.

[56]  Joshua A. Lerman,et al.  COBRApy: COnstraints-Based Reconstruction and Analysis for Python , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[57]  Gianluca Setti,et al.  Design and Analysis of Biomolecular Circuits , 2011 .

[58]  F. Ryan,et al.  Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer , 2016, Gut.

[59]  G. F. Gause,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF VITO VOLTERRA'S MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE. , 1934, Science.

[60]  Sharmila S. Mande,et al.  Web-gLV: A Web Based Platform for Lotka-Volterra Based Modeling and Simulation of Microbial Populations , 2019, Front. Microbiol..