The role of psychophysics laws in quality of experience assessment: a video streaming case study

The wide range of multimedia services has been attracting more users every day, while the increasing number of users plays an important role in the competitive advantage for network/service providers. Due to the fact that the users are the ones who pay for services, their satisfaction is an important goal for each provider in order to survive in the highly competitive market of multimedia services. Because of the nature of multimedia services, users can instantly detect any quality disturbances. For example, users might tolerate several interruptions during a download or upload process, but they may get irritated as soon as they experience a small amount of voice or video disturbance while they are watching their favorite movie through the internet for instance. Thus, quality of experience (QoE) should be maintained at a steady and acceptable level to satisfy users. To do so, it is necessary to identify the contributing factors in the network which affect multimedia quality. Generally speaking, delay, jitter, loss, and bandwidth have considerable impact on multimedia service quality. Because quality of service (QoS) is among the greatest impacting factors of QoE, it seems required to define a quantitative relation between QoE and QoS in order to keep the QoE at an acceptable level. This paper aims to benefit from psychophysics laws to devise quantitative relations which explain the interdependency of QoE and QoS. The proposed quantitative relations are expressed as equations which are then compared in theoretical and experimental setting to indicate which one can better reflect the relationship between QoE and QoS. A video streaming service affected by packet loss was also chosen as a candidate for our test bed. The test-bed results are then estimated by non linear regression and then validated by goodness of fit indexes. In this way, it can be examined how strongly each equation can express the dependency between QoE and QoS.

[1]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  EvalVid - A Framework for Video Transmission and Quality Evaluation , 2003, Computer Performance Evaluation / TOOLS.

[2]  Dohoon Kim.  Application of the HoQ framework to improving QoE of broadband internet services , 2010, IEEE Network.

[3]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Quality of Experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis , 2010 .

[4]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elements of psychophysics , 1966 .

[5]  Seong Gon Choi,et al.  A study on a QoS/QoE correlation model for QoE evaluation on IPTV service , 2010, 2010 The 12th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[6]  Peter Reichl,et al.  The Logarithmic Nature of QoE and the Role of the Weber-Fechner Law in QoE Assessment , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service , 2010, IEEE Network.

[8]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[9]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Testing the IQX Hypothesis for Exponential Interdependency between QoS and QoE of Voice Codecs iLBC and G.711 , 2008 .

[10]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Quantification of Quality of Experience for Edge-Based Applications , 2007, ITC.

[11]  Antonio Liotta,et al.  QoE-aware QoS management , 2008, MoMM.

[12]  J. Guilford.  A generalized psychophysical law. , 1932 .

[13]  Markus Fiedler,et al.  Quality of Experience from user and network perspectives , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[14]  D. J. Murray,et al.  A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Rafidah Md Noor,et al.  Quality of experience key metrics framework for network mobility user , 2011 .

[16]  Hyun-Jin Kim,et al.  Analysis of key features in IPTV service quality model , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.