Continuous intensity map optimization (CIMO): a novel approach to leaf sequencing in step and shoot IMRT.

A new leaf-sequencing approach has been developed that is designed to reduce the number of required beam segments for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This approach to leaf sequencing is called continuous-intensity-map-optimization (CIMO). Using a simulated annealing algorithm, CIMO seeks to minimize differences between the optimized and sequenced intensity maps. Two distinguishing features of the CIMO algorithm are (1) CIMO does not require that each optimized intensity map be clustered into discrete levels and (2) CIMO is not rule-based but rather simultaneously optimizes both the aperture shapes and weights. To test the CIMO algorithm, ten IMRT patient cases were selected (four head-and-neck, two pancreas, two prostate, one brain, and one pelvis). For each case, the optimized intensity maps were extracted from the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system. The CIMO algorithm was applied, and the optimized aperture shapes and weights were loaded back into Pinnacle. A final dose calculation was performed using Pinnacle's convolution/superposition based dose calculation. On average, the CIMO algorithm provided a 54% reduction in the number of beam segments as compared with Pinnacle's leaf sequencer. The plans sequenced using the CIMO algorithm also provided improved target dose uniformity and a reduced discrepancy between the optimized and sequenced intensity maps. For ten clinical intensity maps, comparisons were performed between the CIMO algorithm and the power-of-two reduction algorithm of Xia and Verhey [Med. Phys. 25(8), 1424-1434 (1998)]. When the constraints of a Varian Millennium multileaf collimator were applied, the CIMO algorithm resulted in a 26% reduction in the number of segments. For an Elekta multileaf collimator, the CIMO algorithm resulted in a 67% reduction in the number of segments. An average leaf sequencing time of less than one minute per beam was observed.

[1]  F Nüsslin,et al.  A variable fluence step clustering and segmentation algorithm for step and shoot IMRT. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  L Xing,et al.  Minimizing delivery time and monitor units in static IMRT by leaf-sequencing. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Horst W. Hamacher,et al.  Minimizing beam‐on time in cancer radiation treatment using multileaf collimators , 2004, Networks.

[5]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Algorithms for optimal sequencing of dynamic multileaf collimators. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Shuang Luan,et al.  A new MLC segmentation algorithm/software for step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  D M Shepard,et al.  Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[9]  Yan Chen,et al.  A graph-searching method for MLC leaf sequencing under constraints. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  A L Boyer,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[12]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Incorporating multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing into iterative IMRT optimization. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  D Yan,et al.  Implementing multiple static field delivery for intensity modulated beams. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  R. Siochi,et al.  Modifications to the IMFAST leaf sequencing optimization algorithm. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  K M Ayyangar,et al.  Leaf sequencing techniques for MLC-based IMRT. , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  Timothy J Cullip,et al.  A quality and efficiency analysis of the IMFAST segmentation algorithm in head and neck "step & shoot" IMRT treatments. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  C. Ma,et al.  The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  W Schlegel,et al.  Intensity modulation with the "step and shoot" technique using a commercial MLC: a planning study. Multileaf collimator. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M. Langer,et al.  Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators. , 2001, Medical physics.

[20]  P. C. Williams,et al.  The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  C. Cotrutz,et al.  Segment-based dose optimization using a genetic algorithm. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.