Knowledge production on predatory publishing: A systematic review

The systematic review of the research reported in this paper was conducted within the context of efforts to understand and combat predatory publishing, a new but fast‐growing area of research. It synthesizes the trends observed in knowledge production in predatory publishing, with a particular focus on the volume and distribution over time within different journals. It also looks at the composition of the predatory publishing literature in terms of the type of study, methods, topics, field of study, and contexts where research was conducted. Data were extracted from ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus and identified 228 articles for evaluation published in 171 journals. The results demonstrate that the literature on predatory publishing is new but fast growing, with 88.6% of studies published since 2016. Only 37.3% reported empirical research, and the majority of these were quantitative studies with weak statistical tests. Medical journals carried the most articles. We conclude that scholarship on predatory publishing is in the early stages of development, and it is thinly distributed across journals, fields, and research contexts. It was surprising to find no studies in leading higher education journals, and this study reveals a research area that is still developing.

[1]  Serhat Kurt,et al.  Why do authors publish in predatory journals? , 2018, Learn. Publ..

[2]  S. Saroja,et al.  India’s scientific publication in predatory journals: need for regulating quality of Indian science and education , 2016 .

[3]  Williams Ezinwa Nwagwu,et al.  Penetration of Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007–2012: a bibliometric study , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[4]  Ayokunle Olumuyiwa Omobowale,et al.  Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria , 2014 .

[5]  Alexei Kassian,et al.  Russian Science Citation Index on the WoS platform: a critical assessment , 2019, J. Documentation.

[6]  Timothy J. Perri,et al.  Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals , 2016, Scientometrics.

[7]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers , 2014 .

[8]  Hartmut B. Krentz,et al.  Evaluating medical conferences: the emerging need for a quality metric , 2019, Scientometrics.

[9]  Jairo Buitrago Ciro,et al.  Predatory journals: no definition, no defence , 2019, Nature.

[10]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018 , 2019, Review of Educational Research.

[11]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia , 2015 .

[12]  Fifty years of publication , 2012 .

[13]  Aamir Raoof Memon,et al.  Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? , 2017, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[14]  Edwin M. Bridges,et al.  Research on the School Administrator: The State of the Art, 1967-19801 , 1982 .

[15]  Ahmed Maher Khafaga Shehata,et al.  Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap , 2018, Learn. Publ..

[16]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017 , 2018 .

[17]  Derek Pyne.  The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School , 2017 .

[18]  M. Bellibas,et al.  A systematic review of educational leadership and management research in Turkey , 2019, Journal of Educational Administration.

[19]  A. Casadevall,et al.  Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms , 2011, Infection and Immunity.

[20]  Mary M. Christopher,et al.  Awareness of “Predatory” Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops , 2015, Front. Vet. Sci..

[21]  Shridhar R. Gadre,et al.  A Critical Analysis of the ‘UGC-Approved List of Journals’ , 2018 .

[22]  S. Goh,et al.  International students, academic publications and world university rankings: the impact of globalisation and responses of a Malaysian public university , 2014 .

[23]  Denis Borenstein,et al.  Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study , 2018, Scientometrics.

[24]  Selçuk Beşir Demir,et al.  Scholarly databases under scrutiny , 2020, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Izhar Oplatka.  Educational Administration and the Relational Approach: Can We Suffice Contextual-Based Knowledge Production? , 2018 .

[26]  Philip Hallinger,et al.  Knowledge production on educational leadership and management in Arab societies: A systematic review of research , 2019 .

[27]  Tove Faber Frandsen,et al.  Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers , 2017, Scientometrics.

[28]  Philip Hallinger.  Surfacing a hidden literature , 2018 .