How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams

A literature-based model defining how task and person conflict modify the relationship between positive goal interdependence and decision-making effectiveness in management teams is presented. The model assumes that positive interdependence fosters effective decision making behaviors only if person conflict interferes with task conflict, but not in cases of one-sided task conflict, one-sided person conflict, or no conflict. Survey results obtained from 102 members of management teams illustrate this complex interactive effect of positive interdependence and type of conflict. The proposed refinement of the classic interdependence paradigm may advance recent theory and research on the role of type of conflict in team decision making.

[1]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[2]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Group Decision-Making and Disagreement , 1957 .

[3]  Robert R. Blake,et al.  Managing intergroup conflict in industry , 1964 .

[4]  Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.

[5]  R. Walton.  Interpersonal peacemaking : confrontations and third-party consultation , 1969 .

[6]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Fifth Achievement , 1970 .

[7]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[8]  Stephen P. Robbins,et al.  Managing organizational conflict;: A nontraditional approach , 1974 .

[9]  A. Filley.  Interpersonal conflict resolution , 1975 .

[10]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[11]  John e. Jones.  Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , 1976 .

[12]  B. Brehmer.  Social Judgment Theory and the Analysis of Interpersonal Conflict. , 1976 .

[13]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance , 1977 .

[14]  D. Vredevoe.  Book Review: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale , 1980 .

[15]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .

[16]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[17]  I. Mitroff.  Talking past one's colleagues in matters of policy , 1982 .

[18]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Managing conflict at organizational interfaces , 1982 .

[19]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of Social Context on Consensus and Majority Vote Decision Making , 1982 .

[20]  R. Kessler,et al.  The estimation and interpretation of modifier effects. , 1982, Journal of health and social behavior.

[21]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  Measurement of Organizational Conflict , 1983 .

[22]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[23]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[24]  Victor D. Wall,et al.  Perceptions of Inequity, Satisfaction, and Conflict in Task-Oriented Groups , 1986 .

[25]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[28]  W. Wedley,et al.  Constructive Controversy, the Vroom-Yetton Model, and Managerial Decision-Making , 1986 .

[29]  R. Walton,et al.  Managing Conflict: Interpersonal Dialogue and Third-Party Roles , 1987 .

[30]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  The Manager as Negotiator , 1987 .

[31]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[32]  Jeffrey Barker,et al.  CONFLICT APPROACHES OF EFFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGERS: A FIELD STUDY IN A MATRIX ORGANIZATION[1] , 1988 .

[33]  D. Norburn,et al.  The top management team and corporate performance , 1988 .

[34]  D. Schweiger,et al.  The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision‐making , 1989 .

[35]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making , 1989 .

[36]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[37]  A. Murray.  Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance , 1989 .

[38]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[39]  Charles R. Schwenk.  Conflict in organizational decision making: an exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations , 1990 .

[40]  S. Floyd,et al.  The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance , 1990 .

[41]  E. D. Vliert,et al.  Sternberg's styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A theory-based reanalysis , 1990 .

[42]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions , 1990 .

[43]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  SELF-REGULATION FOR MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF ACTIVE FEEDBACK SEEKING , 1991 .

[44]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective , 1991 .

[45]  K Erwin,et al.  Managing conflict. , 1992, Nursing management.

[46]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[47]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. , 1993 .

[48]  Linda L. Putnam.  PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT: NEGOTIATION AS IMPLICIT COORDINATION , 1994 .

[49]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[50]  C. Dreu,et al.  OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE BY CONFLICT STIMULATION , 1994 .

[51]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY MAINTENANCE PRESCRIPTIONS FOR PREVENTING GROUPTHINK: REDUCING IDENTITY PROTECTION AND ENHANCING INTELLECTUAL CONFLICT , 1994 .

[52]  K. Jehn.  ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT , 1994 .

[53]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[54]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. , 1994 .

[55]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[56]  Martin Euwema,et al.  Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior , 1995 .

[57]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Concern for the other's goals: Key to (de-)escalation of conflict , 1996 .

[58]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[59]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The effects of conflict on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational performance. , 1997 .

[60]  K. Jehn.  Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. , 1997 .

[61]  G. Morgan.  Images of Organizations , 1997 .

[62]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Positive effects of conflict: Insights from social cognition. , 1997 .

[63]  Evert Van der Vliert,et al.  Complex Interpersonal Conflict Behaviour: Theoretical Frontiers , 1997 .

[64]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 2007 .