A computationally efficient method for the attenuation of alternating current stimulation artifacts in electroencephalographic recordings

Objective. Recent studies suggest that the use of noninvasive closed-loop neuromodulation combining electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may be a promising avenue for the treatment of neurological disorders. However, the attenuation of tACS artifacts in EEG data is particularly challenging, and computationally efficient methods are needed to enable closed-loop neuromodulation experiments. Here we introduce an original method to address this methodological issue. Approach. Our alternating current regression (AC-REG) method is an adaptive (time-varying) spatial filtering method. It relies on a data buffer of preset size, on which principal component analysis (PCA) is applied. The resulting components are used to build a spatial filter capable of regressing periodic signals in phase with the stimulation. PCA is performed each time that a new sample enters the buffer, such that the spatial filter can be continuously updated and applied to the EEG data. Main results. The AC-REG accuracy in terms of tACS artifact attenuation was assessed using simulated and real EEG data. Alternative offline processing techniques, such as the superimposition of moving averages (SMA) and the Helfrich method (HeM), were used as benchmark. Using simulations, we found that AC-REG can yield a more reliable reconstruction of the stimulation signal for any frequency between 1 and 80 Hz. Analysis of real EEG data of 18 healthy volunteers showed that AC-REG was able to better recover hidden neural activity as compared to SMA and HeM. Also, significantly higher correlations between power spectrum densities in tACS on and off conditions, respectively, were obtained using AC-REG (r = 0.90) than using SMA (r = 0.80) and HeM (r = 0.86). Significance. Thanks to its low computational complexity, the AC-REG method can be employed in noninvasive closed-loop neuromodulation experiments, with potential applications both in healthy individuals and in neurological patients.

[1]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Modulation of SSVEPs using frequency matched tACS , 2019, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  Anna M. Beres,et al.  Time is of the Essence: A Review of Electroencephalography (EEG) and Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) in Language Research , 2017, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

[4]  K. Schellhorn,et al.  P 215. A method for online correction of artifacts in EEG signals during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  David J. Guggenmos,et al.  Restoration of function after brain damage using a neural prosthesis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Nick Yeung,et al.  The Effects of 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Audiovisual Task Switching , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  Patrizio Tressoldi,et al.  A new method to detect event-related potentials based on Pearson’s correlation , 2015, bioRxiv.

[8]  Siddharth Kohli,et al.  Machine learning validation of EEG+tACS artefact removal , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  S. Rossi,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Tuning of the Human Motor System Induced by Transcranial Oscillatory Potentials , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Complete artifact removal for EEG recorded during continuous fMRI using independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Removal of High-Voltage Brain Stimulation Artifacts From Simultaneous EEG Recordings , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Physiological processes non-linearly affect electrophysiological recordings during transcranial electric stimulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans , 2018, Nature Communications.

[15]  Felice T. Sun,et al.  Closed-loop Neurostimulation: The Clinical Experience , 2014, Neurotherapeutics.

[16]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Closed-loop electrical neurostimulation: Challenges and opportunities , 2018, Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Li-Huei Tsai,et al.  Gamma Entrainment: Impact on Neurocircuits, Glia, and Therapeutic Opportunities , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[19]  Alexander J. Casson,et al.  Removal of Transcranial a.c. Current Stimulation artifact from simultaneous EEG recordings by superposition of moving averages , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[20]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[21]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[22]  José Zariffa,et al.  A Fast EEG Forecasting Algorithm for Phase-Locked Transcranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  A. Pahor,et al.  The Effects of Theta and Gamma tACS on Working Memory and Electrophysiology , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Phase properties of transcranial electrical stimulation artifacts in electrophysiological recordings , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[26]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Automatic Motor Control , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[27]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[28]  Arjon Turnip,et al.  Removal artifacts from EEG signal using independent component analysis and principal component analysis , 2014, 2014 2nd International Conference on Technology, Informatics, Management, Engineering & Environment.

[29]  S. Kohli,et al.  Towards closed-loop transcranial electrical stimulation: a comparison of methods for real time tES-EEG artefact removal using a phantom head model , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix , 2007, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[31]  Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields , 2017, Cell.

[32]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Cognitive effects and autonomic responses to transcranial pulsed current stimulation , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Juliann M. Mellin,et al.  Double-blind, randomized pilot clinical trial targeting alpha oscillations with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) , 2019, Translational Psychiatry.

[34]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  Detecting large‐scale networks in the human brain using high‐density electroencephalography , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[35]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[36]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Marianna Semprini,et al.  Removal of tACS artefact: a simulation study for algorithm comparison , 2019, 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[38]  F. Wendling,et al.  From Oscillatory Transcranial Current Stimulation to Scalp EEG Changes: A Biophysical and Physiological Modeling Study , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  S. Yazawa,et al.  Modulation of Motor Learning Capacity by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2018, Neuroscience.

[40]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  Concurrent tACS-fMRI Reveals Causal Influence of Power Synchronized Neural Activity on Resting State fMRI Connectivity , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Dante Mantini,et al.  Shared and connection-specific intrinsic interactions in the default mode network , 2019, NeuroImage.

[42]  Bin He,et al.  Estimation of Number of Independent Brain Electric Sources From the Scalp EEGs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  F. Fröhlich,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Alexander J. Casson,et al.  Removal of Gross Artifacts of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Simultaneous EEG Monitoring † , 2019, Sensors.

[45]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  Marco Ganzetti,et al.  Online EEG artifact removal for BCI applications by adaptive spatial filtering , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  J. Mink,et al.  Deep brain stimulation. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  Marco Ganzetti,et al.  RT-NET: real-time reconstruction of neural activity using high-density electroencephalography , 2020, Neuroinformatics.

[49]  M. Chiappalone,et al.  Technological Approaches for Neurorehabilitation: From Robotic Devices to Brain Stimulation and Beyond , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[50]  Jan Born,et al.  Transcranial Electrical Currents to Probe EEG Brain Rhythms and Memory Consolidation during Sleep in Humans , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  BOLD signal effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the alpha range: A concurrent tACS–fMRI study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[53]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives , 2016, NeuroImage.

[54]  Lars Riecke,et al.  4-Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Phase Modulates Hearing , 2015, Brain Stimulation.