Dynamics Within Participation: An Experimental Investigation

Research has neglected the dynamics by which participation af fects organizational outcomes. This study argues that the effects of participation depend substantially on how employees interact as they discuss organizational problems. Results indicate that coop erative compared to competitive context facilitates expectations of assistance, exchange of information and ideas, enhanced work re lationships, and high-quality solutions. Findings suggest that re search on the dynamics within participation can help resolve conflicting findings and suggest ways to implement successful participation.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[2]  M McLaughlin,et al.  An experiment. , 1974, Nursing times.

[3]  M. Deutsch An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[4]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Controversy within a cooperative or competitive context and cognitive perspective-taking , 1978 .

[5]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Industrial Democracy And Participative Management: A Case For A Synthesis , 1979 .

[6]  M. Nicholson The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[7]  Florence Vidal Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups , 1973 .

[8]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[9]  D. Tjosvold Unequal Power Relationships Within a Cooperative or Corn petit ive Context , 1981 .

[10]  J. Bragg,et al.  Participative Decision Making: An Experimental Study in a Hospital , 1973 .

[11]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[12]  R. Woodman,et al.  The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. , 1980 .

[13]  J. French,et al.  An Experiment on Participation in a Norwegian Factory , 1960 .

[14]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Implications of Controversy Research for Management , 1985 .

[15]  Harold Sigall,et al.  The cooperative subject: Myth or reality? , 1970 .

[16]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .

[17]  E. Deines Participative management. , 1981, Nursing management.

[18]  L. Levy Awareness, learning, and the beneficent subject as expert witness. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  W. Bennis Organization Development: Its Nature, Origins, and Prospects , 1969 .

[20]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The effects of attitude similarity, expectation of goal facilitation, and actual goal facilitation on interpersonal attraction , 1972 .

[21]  B. Wilpert,et al.  Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[22]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[23]  D. Tjosvold Cooperation Theory and Organizations , 1984 .

[24]  Aaron Lowin,et al.  Participative decision making: A model, literature critique, and prescriptions for research , 1968 .

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Participation in Decision-Making: One More Look , 1979 .

[26]  N. C. Morse,et al.  The experimental change of a major organizational variable. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  Mauk Mulder,et al.  Participation and power equalization , 1970 .

[28]  W. McKeachie,et al.  Cooperative versus competitive discussion methods in teaching introductory psychology. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[29]  M. Sashkin,et al.  Participative management is an ethical imperative. , 1984, Organizational dynamics.

[30]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation, and learning. , 1980 .

[31]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-analysis of the Research , 1983 .