GenELM: Generative Extreme Learning Machine feature representation

Abstract Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) feature representation has been drawing increasing attention, and most of the previous works devoted to learning discriminative features. However, we argue that such kind of features suffer from “categories bias” in target detection tasks, where the scope of the negatives (i.e., backgrounds) is naturally broader than that of the positives (i.e., targets). Technically, the learning of discriminative features aims to maximize positive-negative difference. In this case, the interclass-difference criteria for feature mapping and feature matching would increase model complexity while degrading detection robustness. To address these issues, we construct a generative feature learning framework in this paper. Unlike the discriminative feature representation, generative features tend to cluster the positives from negatives, and in this way, the unique and separable attributes of the positives can be learnt to facilitate the accurate detection of positives (targets). Practically, by exploiting ELM computational advantages, positives clustering oriented feature learning is implemented with a kernel-label alignment function, which guides random features of positives into clusters, while keeping away from the negatives. On the other hand, the density of positives cluster is estimated using a probabilistic model, and thus the likelihood that test samples belonged to the positive category can be approximately inferred. We experimentally evaluate our framework for target detection on synthetic data and Hyperspectral Imagery (HSI), in which reasonable improvements are observed over conventional ELM-based discriminative methods and backpropagation-based multilayer perceptron (MLP) in terms of detection accuracy or learning efficiency.

[1]  L. C. Kasun,et al.  Representational Learning with Extreme Learning Machine for Big Data Liyanaarachchi , 2022 .

[2]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Xiaoying Jin,et al.  A comparative study of target detection algorithms for hyperspectral imagery , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[5]  John C. Duchi,et al.  Learning Kernels with Random Features , 2016, NIPS.

[6]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  N. Cristianini,et al.  On Kernel-Target Alignment , 2001, NIPS.

[8]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Rama Rao Nidamanuri,et al.  Spectral material mapping using hyperspectral imagery: a review of spectral matching and library search methods , 2013 .

[11]  Hongming Zhou,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[12]  W. B. Johnson,et al.  Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into Hilbert space , 1984 .

[13]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Multilayer Perceptron , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[14]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  An Insight into Extreme Learning Machines: Random Neurons, Random Features and Kernels , 2014, Cognitive Computation.

[16]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Ensemble of exemplar-SVMs for object detection and beyond , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Ye Yuan,et al.  An OS-ELM based distributed ensemble classification framework in P2P networks , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[20]  Guoren Wang,et al.  Distributed Learning over Massive XML Documents in ELM Feature Space , 2015 .

[21]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[22]  G. Wahba,et al.  A Correspondence Between Bayesian Estimation on Stochastic Processes and Smoothing by Splines , 1970 .

[23]  Dipankar Das,et al.  Enhanced SenticNet with Affective Labels for Concept-Based Opinion Mining , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[24]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Trends in extreme learning machines: A review , 2015, Neural Networks.

[25]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Distributed Learning over Massive XML Documents in ELM Feature Space , 2015 .

[26]  Xin Bi,et al.  XML document classification based on ELM , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[27]  Alexandros Iosifidis,et al.  Graph Embedded Extreme Learning Machine , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[28]  Qian Du,et al.  A comparative study for orthogonal subspace projection and constrained energy minimization , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  Jun Miao,et al.  Hierarchical Extreme Learning Machine for unsupervised representation learning , 2015, 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[30]  S. Shanmugam,et al.  Spectral matching approaches in hyperspectral image processing , 2014 .

[31]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Extreme learning machine and adaptive sparse representation for image classification , 2016, Neural Networks.

[32]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.