Toward a New Conceptualization of Settlements for Demography

It has long been recognized that where people live and work can be a relevant factor in helping to explain demographic behavior, yet the treatment of location in censuses and surveys remains surprisingly crude. Emphasis is still being given to the urban–rural dichotomy based on definitions that most countries around the world introduced 40 to 50 years ago and have modified little since. Given the increase in the complexity of settlement systems in recent decades in less developed as well as in more developed contexts, this simple classification is no longer adequate for examining the role of settlement in demographic processes. The time has come to rethink how settlement should be differentiated in population data collection and analysis. Contemporary technologies and methodologies make it possible to analyze spatially referenced data in ways that are more rapid and sophisticated than could have been imagined when the conventional approach was devised.

[1]  Anne E. Green,et al.  Changing Places: Britain's Demographic, Economic and Social Complexion , 1987 .

[2]  D. Sly,et al.  Basic data needed for the study of urbanization , 1975 .

[3]  Mike Coombes,et al.  Public Policy and Population Distribution: Developing Appropriate Indicators of Settlement Patterns , 2001 .

[4]  Graeme Hugo,et al.  New Forms of Urbanization , 2003 .

[5]  G. Hugo.  Circular Migration in Indonesia , 1982 .

[6]  I. Burnley,et al.  Exurban Development in Australia and the United States: Through a Glass Darkly , 1995 .

[7]  P. Cheshire.  A New Phase of Urban Development in Western Europe? The Evidence for the 1980s , 1995 .

[8]  A. Nelson,et al.  The Exurbanization of America and Its Planning Policy Implications , 1990 .

[9]  M. Lang.  REDEFINING URBAN AND RURAL FOR THE U.S. CENSUS OF POPULATION: ASSESSING THE NEED AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES , 1986 .

[10]  T. Dax.  Defining rural areas – International comparisons and the OECD indicators1 , 1996 .

[11]  Frans M. Dieleman,et al.  Polynucleated regions in Northwest Europe , 1998 .

[12]  Mike Coombes,et al.  Defining Locality Boundaries with Synthetic Data , 2000 .

[13]  East-West Environment,et al.  The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia , 1991, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[14]  A. Fielding,et al.  Counterurbanisation in Western Europe , 1982 .

[15]  L. Wirth,et al.  Urbanism as a Way of Life , 1938, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  D. Uzzell.  Conceptual Fallacies in the Rural-Urban Dichotomy. , 1979 .

[17]  R. M. Atwater.  Demographic Yearbook 1952 , 1953 .

[18]  Ray Pahl,et al.  THE RURAL‐URBAN CONTINUUM1 , 1966 .

[19]  Terry McGee,et al.  The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis , 1991 .

[20]  Robert B. Mendelson.  Geographic Structures As Census Variables: Using Geography to Analyse Social and Economic Processes , 2001 .

[21]  P. Cloke.  An index of rurality for England and Wales , 1977 .

[22]  J. Friedmann,et al.  THE URBAN FIELD , 1965 .

[23]  A. Champion.  A Changing Demographic Regime and Evolving Poly centric Urban Regions: Consequences for the Size, Composition and Distribution of City Populations , 2001 .

[24]  Dennis G. Hay,et al.  Growth centres in the European urban system , 1983 .