Optimization of PSA process for producing enriched hydrogen from plasma reactor gas

Abstract Hydrogen purification with optimum recovery and energy consumption from various process streams represents one of the major commercial uses of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) technology. In the plasma process for hydrogen production, the effluent stream from a reactor has to be processed to obtain the high purity hydrogen before being fed to fuel cells for power generation or stored in tanks. The major impurity in the effluent stream is unreacted methane. A rigorous PSA model for simulation and optimization purposes has been developed. The non-isothermal, bulk separation with variable superficial velocity and dispersion coefficient, linear driving force approximation for particle uptake, and Langmuir isotherm to represent adsorption equilibrium were applied in the PSA modeling. The model was solved using gPROMS software. The extensive simulation results involving parametric studies of PSA separation performance were well matched with the experimental results using an activated carbon made from coconut shell as an adsorbent. The optimal conditions for separation of 50%H2/50%CH4 mixture in a laboratory-scale PSA unit, and separation of 25%H2/75%CH4 mixture, representing exit gas from plasma reactor, in a pilot-scale PSA unit were obtained by carrying out optimization routines in gPROMS.

[1]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorption and Fractionated Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes for CO2 Capture , 2005 .

[2]  S. Farooq,et al.  Revisiting Transport of Gases in the Micropores of Carbon Molecular Sieves , 2003 .

[3]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization of a Pressure-Swing Adsorption Process Using Zeolite 13X for CO2 Sequestration , 2003 .

[4]  D. Do,et al.  Multicomponent adsorption kinetics of hydrocarbons onto activated carbon: effect of adsorption equilibrium equations , 1992 .

[5]  L. Biegler,et al.  Simulation and Optimization of a Pressure Swing Adsorption System: Recovering Hydrogen from Methane , 2005 .

[6]  G. Calleja,et al.  Adsorption of gaseous hydrocarbons on activated carbon: Characteristic kinetic curve , 1985 .

[7]  Terje Hertzberg,et al.  Optimization of PSA systems—studies on cyclic steady state convergence , 1997 .

[8]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Gas separation by pressure swing adsorption: A pore‐diffusion model for bulk separation , 1985 .

[9]  Shamsuzzaman Farooq,et al.  Hydrogen purification from refinery fuel gas by pressure swing adsorption , 1998 .

[10]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes , 1984 .

[11]  Daniel Tondeur,et al.  A method to obtain a compact representation of process performances from a numerical simulator: example of pressure swing adsorption for pure hydrogen production , 1995 .

[12]  S. Nilchan,et al.  On the Optimisation of Periodic Adsorption Processes , 1998 .

[13]  Arthur W. Westerberg,et al.  A short note : the optimal design of pressure swing adsorption systems. , 1991 .

[14]  Shamsuzzaman Farooq,et al.  Study of a six-bed pressure swing adsorption process , 1997 .

[15]  K. S. Knaebel,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption , 1993 .

[16]  E. Glueckauf,et al.  241. Theory of chromatography. Part IV. The influence of incomplete equilibrium on the front boundary of chromatograms and on the effectiveness of separation , 1947 .

[17]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Simulation and optimal design of multiple‐bed pressure swing adsorption systems , 2004 .

[18]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Bulk Gas Separation by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 1986 .

[19]  J. Fair,et al.  Study of the adsorption and desorption of multiple adsorbates in a fixed bed , 1988 .