Structure–activity relationships for reactivity of carbonyl-containing compounds with glutathione

For toxicological-based structure–activity relationships to advance, will require a better understanding of molecular reactivity. A rapid and inexpensive spectrophotometric assay for determining the reactive to glutathione (GSH) was developed and used to determine GSH reactivity (reactGSH) data for 21 aliphatic derivatives of esters, ketones and aldehydes. From these data, a series of structure–activity relationships were evaluated. The structure feature associated with reactGSH was an acetylenic or olefinic moiety conjugated to a carbonyl group (i.e. polarized α,β-unsaturation). This structure conveys the capacity to undergo a covalent interaction with the thiol group of cysteine (i.e. Michael- addition). Quantitatively reactGSH of the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds is reliant upon the specific molecular structure with several tendencies observed. Specifically, it was noted that for α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds: (1) the acetylenic-substituted derivatives were more reactive than the corresponding olefinic-substituted ones; (2) terminal vinyl-substituted derivatives was more reactive than the internal vinylene-substituted ones; (3) methyl substitution on the vinyl carbon atoms diminishes reactivity and methyl-substitution on the carbon atom farthest from the carbonyl group causes a larger reduction; (4) derivatives with carbon–carbon double bond on the end of the molecule (i.e. vinyl ketone) were more reactive than one with the carbon–oxygen bond at the end of the molecule (i.e. aldehyde) and (5) the ester with an additional unsaturated vinyl groups were more reactive than the derivative having an unsaturated ethyl group.

[1]  T W Schultz,et al.  Trends in structure–toxicity relationships for carbonyl-containing α,β-unsaturated compounds , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[2]  H. Esterbauer,et al.  Reaction of Glutathione with Conjugated Carbonyls , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[3]  David W Roberts,et al.  Structure-toxicity relationships for the effects to Tetrahymena pyriformis of aliphatic, carbonyl-containing, alpha,beta-unsaturated chemicals. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[4]  Andreas P. Freidig,et al.  Comparing the Potency of Chemicals with Multiple Modes of Action in Aquatic Toxicology: Acute Toxicity Due to Narcosis versus Reactive Toxicity of Acrylic Compounds , 1999 .

[5]  B. Papirmeister,et al.  Medical Defense Against Mustard Gas: Toxic Mechanisms and Pharmacological Implications , 1991 .

[6]  A. Roche,et al.  Organic Chemistry: , 1982, Nature.

[7]  G. Witz,et al.  The Reactivity of Selected Acrylate Esters toward Glutathione and Deoxyribonucleosides in Vitro: Structure-Activity Relationships , 1994 .

[8]  Andreas P. Freidig,et al.  Quantitative structure-property relationships for the chemical reactivity of acrylates and methacrylates , 1999 .

[9]  G D Veith On the nature, evolution and future of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[10]  E. Clarke,et al.  Metabolism‐related assays and their application to agrochemical research: reactivity of pesticides with glutathione and glutathione transferases† , 1998 .

[11]  Jerry March,et al.  Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure , 1977 .

[12]  Joop L. M. Hermens,et al.  Quantitative correlation studies between the acute lethal toxicity of 15 organic halides to the guppy (Poecillah Reticulata) and chemical reactivity towards 4‐nitrobenzylpyridine , 1985 .