Pollen morphology of tribes Aptosimeae and Myoporeae supports the phylogenetic pattern in early-branching Scrophulariaceae revealed by molecular studies

Abstract Mosyakin S. L. & Tsymbalyuk Z. M.: Pollen morphology of tribes Aptosimeae and Myoporeae supports the phylogenetic pattern in early-branching Scrophulariaceae revealed by molecular studies. — Willdenowia 45: 209–222. 2015. — Version of record first published online on 15 July 2015 ahead of inclusion in August 2015 issue; ISSN 1868-6397; © 2015 BGBM Berlin. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45207 Pollen morphology of six species representing three genera of tribe Aptosimeae and six species representing two genera of tribe Myoporeae (Scrophulariaceae) is described and illustrated using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Pollen grains in Aptosimeae are 3-syncolporate, prolate, sometimes oblate-spheroidal in shape; mainly medium-sized, occasionally in some taxa small; exine sculpture striate, rarely with microperforations and small granules. Pollen grains in Myoporeae are 3-colpate-diorate, spheroidal, rarely oblate-spheroidal or prolate in shape; mainly medium-sized, occasionally in some taxa small; exine sculpture foveolate, microreticulate, rugulate-microperforate, rugulate, sometimes with small granules. Two major pollen types, 3-syncolporate (Aptosimeae) and 3-colpate-diorate (Myoporeae) are recognized by aperture types. Within these pollen types, eight subtypes are distinguished (three in Aptosimeae, five in Myoporeae) based on pollen size, exine sculpture and details of colpi and endoapertures. Our analysis of palynomorphological data (both published earlier and newly reported here) outlines the same main clades as those revealed by molecular phylogenetic studies, corresponding to Aptosimeae, Leucophylleae+Myoporeae and Androya, which differ by their pollen aperture types: 3-syncolporate, 3-colpate-diorate, and 3-colporate, respectively. There are also some differences in exine sculpture patterns. Thus, palynomorphological data are mainly consistent with recent results of molecular phylogenetic studies. Considerations on ancestral pollen character states in early-branching Scrophulariaceae are provided. It is assumed that the colporate type was probably ancestral in Scrophulariaceae; however, the ancestral status of the colpate type cannot be excluded as well.

[1]  S. Mosyakin,et al.  Pollen morphology of the southern African tribe Teedieae, an early-branching lineage of crown Scrophulariaceae , 2015 .

[2]  K. Müller,et al.  The phylogeny of Linderniaceae — The new genus Linderniella, and new combinations within Bonnaya, Craterostigma, Lindernia, Micranthemum, Torenia and Vandellia , 2013 .

[3]  V. Sosa,et al.  Testing the monophyly and position of the North American shrubby desert genus Leucophyllum (Scrophulariaceae: Leucophylleae) , 2013 .

[4]  R. Sage,et al.  Phylogeny and photosynthetic pathway distribution in Anticharis Endl. (Scrophulariaceae). , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  R. Sage,et al.  The C(4) plant lineages of planet Earth. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[6]  D. Albach,et al.  Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[7]  F. W. Gess,et al.  Pollen wasps and flowers in southern Africa. , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel E. Austin Diversity and classification of flowering plants , 1998, Economic Botany.

[9]  David C. Tank,et al.  Review of the systematics of Scrophulariaceae s.l. and their current disposition , 2006 .

[10]  Bengt Oxelman,et al.  Further disintegration of Scrophulariaceae , 2005 .

[11]  D. Bartels,et al.  The Linderniaceae and Gratiolaceae are further lineages distinct from the Scrophulariaceae (Lamiales). , 2005, Plant biology.

[12]  C. dePamphilis,et al.  Disintegration of the scrophulariaceae. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[13]  J. O'rourke,et al.  Morphology and Ultrastructure , 2001 .

[14]  Noel H. Holmgren,et al.  Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff , 1998 .

[15]  A. L. Takhtadzhi︠a︡n Diversity and classification of flowering plants , 1997 .

[16]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on Chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences , 1995 .

[17]  W. H. Eshbaugh,et al.  Pollen morphology of the Orobanchaceae and rhinanthoid Scrophulariaceae , 1987 .

[18]  J. Henrickson,et al.  SYSTEMATICS OF LEUCOPHYLLUM AND EREMOGETON (SCROPHULARIACEAE) , 1985 .

[19]  W. Punt,et al.  Pollen Morphology and Taxonomy in the Loganiaceae , 1967 .

[20]  R. Schmid,et al.  Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Angiosperms. (An Introduction to Palynology. I.) , 1987 .

[21]  P. Raven Flowering Plants , 1897, Nature.