Global-Perspective Jitter Improves Vection in Central Vision

Previous vection research has tended to minimise visual – vestibular conflict by using optic-flow patterns which simulate self-motions of constant velocity. Here, experiments are reported on the effect of adding ‘global-perspective jitter’ to these displays—simulating forward motion of the observer on a platform oscillating in horizontal and/or vertical dimensions. Unlike non-jittering displays, jittering displays produced a situation of sustained visual–vestibular conflict. Contrary to the prevailing notion that visual – vestibular conflict impairs vection, jittering optic flow was found to produce shorter vection onsets and longer vection durations than non-jittering optic flow for all of jitter magnitudes and temporal frequencies examined. On the basis of these findings, it would appear that purely radial patterns of optic flow are not the optimal inducing stimuli for vection. Rather, flow patterns which contain both regular and random-oscillating components appear to produce the most compelling subjective experiences of self-motion.

[1]  J Tiffin,et al.  Distortion of drivers' estimates of automobile speed as a function of speed adaptation. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  G G Denton The Influence of Visual Pattern on Perceived Speed , 1980, Perception.

[3]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[4]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .

[7]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  The role of vision in the control of posture during linear motion. , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[8]  B J Frost,et al.  The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  B J Frost,et al.  Factors affecting the onset and magnitude of linear vection , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J R Lackner,et al.  Optokinetic motion sickness: attenuation of visually-induced apparent self-rotation by passive head movements. , 1979, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  L. Young,et al.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  S Palmisano,et al.  Perceiving self-motion in depth: The role of stereoscopic motion and changing-size cues , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  An ecological Theory of Motion Sickness and Postural Instability , 1991 .

[14]  J. Lishman,et al.  The Autonomy of Visual Kinaesthesis , 1973, Perception.

[15]  B. Guschlbauer,et al.  The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia , 1984, Brain Research.

[16]  David N. Lee Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[17]  L R Young,et al.  Interaction of optokinetic and vestibular stimuli in motion perception. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  L R Young,et al.  Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation. , 1975, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[19]  G. Johansson Studies on Visual Perception of Locomotion , 1977, Perception.

[20]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[21]  I. Giannopulu,et al.  Linear-Vection Chronometry along Spinal and Sagittal Axes in Erect Man , 1998, Perception.

[22]  John P. Wann,et al.  The illusion of self-motion in virtual reality environments , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  B J Frost,et al.  Linear Vection in the Central Visual Field Facilitated by Kinetic Depth Cues , 1992, Perception.

[25]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[26]  V Henn,et al.  The latency of circular vection during different accelerations of the optokinetic stimulus , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  I P Howard,et al.  Effect of Stationary Objects on Illusory Forward Self-Motion Induced by a Looming Display , 1988, Perception.

[28]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Induced self-motion in central vision. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[31]  J. Gibson,et al.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .