Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Robust Bridge Damage Identification against Sensor Noise

One of the important goals of structural health monitoring is to identify structural damage using measured responses. However, such damage identification is sensitive to noises in the response measurements. Even a small change in the measurement may result in a significantly biased damage assessment. The goal of this paper is to expand the multiobjective optimization approach developed for robust damage identification in order to facilitate its applications to more realistic bridge damage identification problems. Specifically, a benchmark problem on highway bridges, developed under the auspices of International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS), is investigated. Various issues regarding sensor noises, multiple measurements, and loading scenarios are addressed to improve the robustness of bridge damage identification. A major finding from this study is that the stochastic process of Pareto optimal solutions obtained in a single run not only captures the actual damage locations successfully but also provides useful information such as damage-detected ratio on the potential candidates for damage to be inspected on site. Moreover, it is shown through the success, failure, and partial detection rates that the robustness of the proposed approach can be improved by using appropriate excitation scenarios and multiple sets of measurement data.

[1]  M. M. Reda Taha,et al.  Damage identification for structural health monitoring using fuzzy pattern recognition , 2005 .

[2]  Jie Wu,et al.  Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks with Fault-Tolerance for Structural Health Monitoring , 2015, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[3]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Substructure Identification and Health Monitoring Using Noisy Response Measurements Only , 2006, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[4]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Strain Energy and Hybrid Multiobjective Optimization , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[6]  M. Kozek,et al.  Multi-objective parameter identification of Euler–Bernoulli beams under axial load , 2015 .

[7]  Quanquan Qi,et al.  Study of Structural Damage Detection with Multi-objective Function Genetic Algorithms , 2011 .

[8]  Antonio Ruiz,et al.  Static–dynamic multi-scale structural damage identification in a multi-objective framework , 2013 .

[9]  Anne Raich,et al.  Multi‐objective Optimization of Sensor and Excitation Layouts for Frequency Response Function‐Based Structural Damage Identification , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Seung-Yong Ok,et al.  Robust structural damage identification based on multi‐objective optimization , 2009 .

[11]  John C. Brigham,et al.  Assessment of multi-objective optimization for nondestructive evaluation of damage in structural components , 2014 .

[12]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Estimation: Long Span Truss Bridge Application With Environmental Monitoring Data , 2008 .

[13]  Man-Woo Park,et al.  1‐Norm‐based regularization scheme for system identification of structures with discontinuous system parameters , 2007 .

[14]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[15]  James L. Beck,et al.  A Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[16]  Young-Jin Cha,et al.  Optimal placement of active control devices and sensors in frame structures using multi‐objective genetic algorithms , 2013 .