COMPARISON OF SAMPLING METHODS FOR INVENTORY OF BAT COMMUNITIES

Abstract From 1999 to 2005, we sampled the bat fauna of Catalonia (northeastern Spain, Mediterranean region) using 3 methods (bat detectors, mist nets, and roost surveys) and determined the total number of bat species present (S = 22). Twelve bat species and 5 acoustic groups (≥5 different species) were identified using bat detectors, 17 species were found during roost inspections, and 13 species were trapped using mist nets. However, mist nets yielded the highest species richness per number of individuals sampled, as demonstrated by rarefaction. Some species were always either over- or undersampled according to the sampling method used. We also evaluated 3 guilds of bats defined by summer roost preferences, documenting a significant correlation between guild and detection method; cavity-roosting bats were underrepresented when only bat detectors and mist-net surveys were used, whereas rock crevices or man-made structure and tree guilds were underrepresented when only roosts were surveyed. Different techniques should be used to assess the richness of bat communities and we recommend combining all the methods described above in future bat surveys.

[1]  A. Novick,et al.  The world of bats , 1969 .

[2]  Ó. D. Paz,et al.  Clave para la identificación de los murciélagos de la Península Ibérica (Mammalia, Chiroptera) , 1989 .

[3]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference , 1993 .

[5]  Wilfried Schober,et al.  Los murciélagos de España y de Europa , 1996 .

[6]  S. Harris,et al.  Factors determining the abundance of vespertilionid bats in Britain: geographical, land class and local habitat relationships , 1996 .

[7]  S. Harris,et al.  Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-band acoustic method , 1997 .

[8]  Gordon L. Kirkland,et al.  Guidelines for the Capture, Handling, and Care of Mammals as Approved by the American Society of Mammalogists , 1998 .

[9]  D. Pauza,et al.  Bats of Lithuania: distribution, status and protection , 1998 .

[10]  Ingemar Ahlén,et al.  Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from field identification, surveys, and monitoring , 1999 .

[11]  M. J. O'farrell,et al.  A Comparison of Acoustic Versus Capture Techniques for the Inventory of Bats , 1999 .

[12]  R. Barclay,et al.  Bats are not birds- a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats: a comment , 1999 .

[13]  E. Britzke,et al.  Surveying bat communities: a comparison between mist nets and the Anabat II bat detector system , 1999 .

[14]  Danilo Russo,et al.  The social calls of Kuhl's pipistrelles Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl, 1819): structure and variation (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) , 1999 .

[15]  Graeme Newell,et al.  The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south-eastern Australia , 2000 .

[16]  M. Brittingham,et al.  Bat boxes as alternative roosts for displaced bat maternity colonies. , 2000 .

[17]  J. Hayes,et al.  Assumptions and practical considerations in the design and interpretation of echolocation-monitoring studies , 2000 .

[18]  P. Racey,et al.  The UK's National Bat Monitoring Programme. Final Report , 2001 .

[19]  A. Guisan,et al.  Modelling the distribution of bats in relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain environment , 2001 .

[20]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[21]  Spain. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza,et al.  Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de Espãna , 2002 .

[22]  Anna Świątkowska,et al.  Bat fauna of the Ilawa Lakeland Landscape Park (northern Poland) , 2002 .

[23]  M. Willig,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL ECOLOGY AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL: PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIVERSITY OF NEW WORLD BATS , 2002 .

[24]  Danilo Russo,et al.  Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications , 2003 .

[25]  S. Harris,et al.  Bat activity and species richness on organic and conventional farms: impact of agricultural intensification , 2003 .

[26]  C. Flaquer,et al.  Contribución al conocimiento de la distribución de la fauna quiropterológica de Cataluña , 2004 .

[27]  Carles Flaquer,et al.  THREE METHODS FOR ASSESSING RICHNESS AND COMPOSITION OF SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITIES , 2004 .

[28]  C. López-González.  Ecological zoogeography of the bats of Paraguay , 2004 .

[29]  J. Palmeirim,et al.  Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes , 2004 .

[30]  S. Harris,et al.  Abundance and Species Richness of Nocturnal Insects on Organic and Conventional Farms: Effects of Agricultural Intensification on Bat Foraging , 2004 .

[31]  W. Bogdanowicz,et al.  ROOST CAVITY SELECTION BY NYCTALUS NOCTULA AND N. LEISLERI (VESPERTILIONIDAE, CHIROPTERA) IN BIAŁOWIEŻA PRIMEVAL FOREST, EASTERN POLAND , 2005 .

[32]  Carles Flaquer,et al.  First resident population of Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius, 1839) in the Iberian Peninsula , 2005 .

[33]  J. Malcolm,et al.  VARIATION IN SMALL MAMMAL SPECIES RICHNESS BY TRAP HEIGHT AND TRAP TYPE IN SOUTHEASTERN AMAZONIA , 2005 .

[34]  M. Fenton,et al.  USE OF SPATIAL FEATURES BY FORAGING INSECTIVOROUS BATS IN A LARGE URBAN LANDSCAPE , 2005 .

[35]  Carles Flaquer,et al.  The value of bat-boxes in the conservation of Pipistrellus pygmaeus in wetland rice paddies , 2006 .