Positive Surgical Margins in Early Stage Oral Cavity Cancer

Objective To report the incidence of positive surgical margins in early oral cavity cancer and identify patient, tumor, and system factors associated with their occurrence. Study Design and Setting Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database. Subjects and Methods Patients diagnosed with stage I or II oral cavity squamous cell cancer between 1998 and 2011 were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with positive margins were conducted. Results In total, 20,602 patients with early oral cancer were identified. Margin status was reported in 94.8% of cases, and positive margins occurred in 7.5% of those cases. Incidence of positive margins by institution varied from 0% to 43.8%, with median incidence of 7.1%. Positive margins were associated with clinical factors including stage II disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.98), intermediate grade (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37), high grade (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.39-2.03), and floor of mouth (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08), buccal mucosa (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.68), and retromolar locations (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.85-3.11). Positive margins were also associated with treatment at nonacademic cancer centers (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44) and institutions with a low oral cancer case volume (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.69). Conclusion Positive margins are associated with tumor factors, including stage, grade, and site, reflecting disease aggressiveness and difficulty of resection. Positive margins also are associated with factors such as treatment facility type, hospital case volume, and geographic region, suggesting potential variation in quality of care. Margin status may be a useful quality measure for early oral cavity cancer.

[1]  T. Helliwell,et al.  Do positive resection margins after ablative surgery for head and neck cancer adversely affect prognosis? A study of 352 patients with recurrent carcinoma following radiotherapy treated by salvage surgery. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  R. Bell,et al.  Survival analysis and risk factors for recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma: does surgical salvage affect outcome? , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  M. Varvares,et al.  Surgical margin determination in head and neck oncology: Current clinical practice. The results of an International American Head and Neck Society Member Survey , 2005, Head & neck.

[4]  H R Rubin,et al.  From a process of care to a measure: the development and testing of a quality indicator. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[5]  R. Bell,et al.  Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  Paola Dalmasso,et al.  Clinicopathological parameters and outcome of 245 patients operated for oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[7]  E. McGlynn,et al.  Part 2: Measuring Quality of Care , 1996 .

[8]  D. Sessions,et al.  Analysis of Treatment Results for Oral Tongue Cancer , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  P. Lou,et al.  The impact of pathologic close margin on the survival of patients with early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2011, Oral oncology.

[10]  Andrew Ma,et al.  Comparison of Cases Captured in the National Cancer Data Base with Those in Population-based Central Cancer Registries , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  R H Brook,et al.  Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Y Yamashita,et al.  The high prognostic value of the histologic grade at the deep invasive front of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. , 2005, Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology.

[13]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  I. Yoo,et al.  Standardized Uptake Value and Resection Margin Involvement Predict Outcomes in pN0 Head and Neck Cancer , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  George K B Sándor,et al.  What is the adequate margin of surgical resection in oral cancer? , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  S C Shiboski,et al.  Trends in oral cancer rates in the United States, 1973-1996. , 2000, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[17]  B. Lindgren,et al.  The Effect of Treating Institution on Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  Ryuichi Hayashi,et al.  Predictive Markers for Late Cervical Metastasis in Stage I and II Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  S. Tai,et al.  Treatment for T1-2 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma with or Without Perineural Invasion: Neck Dissection and Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  R. Weber,et al.  Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[21]  James S. Brown,et al.  Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer. , 2009, Oral oncology.

[22]  D. Wiesenfeld,et al.  Are wider surgical margins needed for early oral tongue cancer? , 2012, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.