German Energiewende and the Heating Market - Impact and Limits of Policy

The German Energiewende envisages achieving a climate-neutral building stock in 2050 by means of two major pillars of regulation. First, residential buildings should consume 80% less primary energy and second; the remaining energy demand should be covered primarily with renewables. This paper simulates the future German heating market under different policy scenarios in order to evaluate the impact and limits of recent and conceivable policies. The investigation is based upon a dual model approach, linking a residential heating model to a discrete choice model. The major finding is that current regulations are not suitable for the achievement of governmental targets. Scenario calculations show that additional carbon emission reductions, triggered by the current regulatory regime, are falling short of expectations. In terms of economic efficiency, all calculated policy alternatives outperform the regulation currently in place. This allows to draw the conclusion that carbon emission reductions can be achieved without a major increase in cost. The model results highlight two policy implications. First, a rising mandatory share of renewables in the heating market is needed for target achievement and can be cost effectively. Second, renewable obligations for heating systems must include the existing building stock to achieve the postulated political targets.

[1]  Karin Ericsson,et al.  Devising renewable heat policy: Overview of support options , 2013 .

[2]  C. Weber,et al.  Gesetzliche Änderungen: Wirtschaftlichkeit von Heizsystemen neu hinterfragen , 2010 .

[3]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Carrots, sticks & sermons : policy instruments & their evaluation , 1998 .

[4]  Pekka Tuominen,et al.  Energy savings potential in buildings and overcoming market barriers in member states of the European Union , 2012 .

[5]  Carolin Löffler,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curves of the Residential Heating Market: A Microeconomic Approach , 2017 .

[6]  Julika Weiss,et al.  Improving policy instruments to better tap into homeowner refurbishment potential: Lessons learned from a case study in Germany , 2012 .

[7]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Homeowners' preferences for adopting innovative residential heating systems: A discrete choice analysis for Germany , 2012 .

[8]  Alfred Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics. , 1891 .

[9]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  Policies to support renewable energies in the heat market , 2008 .

[10]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Individual decisions and system development – Integrating modelling approaches for the heating market , 2014 .

[11]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[12]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[13]  D. McFadden Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[14]  Lukas Kranzl,et al.  Renewable heating: Perspectives and the impact of policy instruments , 2013 .

[15]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Effective policy instruments for energy efficiency in residential space heating : an international empirical analysis (EPISODE) , 2000 .

[16]  C. Weber,et al.  Individual Choice in a Residential Building & Heating Model – An Application Case for Germany , 2015 .

[17]  María del P. Pablo-Romero,et al.  Promoting renewable energy sources for heating and cooling in EU-27 countries , 2011 .

[18]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  Analysis of harmonisation options for renewable heating support policies in the European Union , 2013 .

[19]  N. Strachan,et al.  Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice , 2011 .

[20]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  Policy options towards an energy efficient residential building stock in the EU-27 , 2010 .

[21]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Energy consumption for space heating of West-German households: empirical evidence, scenario projections and policy implications , 2000 .

[22]  Jürgen P. Kropp,et al.  Heating and cooling energy demand and related emissions of the German residential building stock under climate change , 2011 .

[23]  D. Braun,et al.  Politikinstrumente im Kontext von Staat, Markt und Governance , 2008 .

[24]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Germany's path towards nearly zero-energy buildings—Enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock , 2011 .

[25]  R. Madlener,et al.  Switching from fossil fuel to renewables in residential heating systems: An empirical study of homeowners' decisions in Germany , 2014 .

[26]  Brigitte Knopf,et al.  Renewable electricity generation in Germany: A meta-analysis of mitigation scenarios , 2013 .

[27]  D. Pearce,et al.  Cost?Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[28]  M. Bemelmans-videc Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. , 1998 .

[29]  Joe Garcea,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems Michael Howlett and M. Ramesh Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. viii, 239 , 1996, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique.